Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Автоканал Калининград

Channel

Автоканал Калининград

@autoclub_kld

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,092subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001160722702
TypeChannel
Username@autoclub_kld
DescriptionНовости с дорог 39го региона🛣 Мы в ВК: vk.com/autoclub_kld Мы в МАХ: max.ru/autoclub_kld Реклама, сотрудничество 📩 @artem_maslov39 ПРАЙС - media-balt.ru/price ☑️РКН: vk.cc/cGd5dc
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/autoclub_kld

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@blacklistkld/242205 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC@autoclub_kld/23686 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC1.0047 minutes
@blacklistkld/242226 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC@autoclub_kld/23706 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC1.0024 hours
@blacklistkld/242246 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC@autoclub_kld/23700 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC1.005.7 hours
@blacklistkld/242286 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC@autoclub_kld/23699 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC1.003 minutes
@blacklistkld/242377 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC@autoclub_kld/23710 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC1.005.0 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@blacklistkld5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.9 hours@blacklistkld (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @blacklistkld. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

27,08427,12427,1046 August 2026 — 27,089 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,090 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,094 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,085 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,084 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,101 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,097 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,101 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,094 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,099 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,089 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,093 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,097 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,100 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,098 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,095 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,099 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,102 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,112 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,124 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,123 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,116 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,117 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,106 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,117 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,113 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,114 subscribers7 September 2026 — 27,111 subscribers10 September 2026 — 27,102 subscribers12 September 2026 — 27,093 subscribers13 September 2026 — 27,098 subscribers15 September 2026 — 27,095 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27,092 subscribers27,0926 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,078–27,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:5827,092-3
15 Sept 2026, 19:2027,095-3
13 Sept 2026, 23:5927,098+5
12 Sept 2026, 06:5527,093-9
10 Sept 2026, 04:3927,102-9
7 Sept 2026, 00:5527,111-3
4 Sept 2026, 11:5527,114+1
2 Sept 2026, 23:3627,113-4
1 Sept 2026, 19:2327,117+11
31 Aug 2026, 21:5727,106-11
30 Aug 2026, 20:5527,117+1
30 Aug 2026, 00:0527,116-7
29 Aug 2026, 03:3427,123-1
28 Aug 2026, 07:0327,124+12
27 Aug 2026, 08:1227,112+10
26 Aug 2026, 05:1327,102+3
25 Aug 2026, 05:5427,099+4
24 Aug 2026, 06:1727,095-3
22 Aug 2026, 16:1827,098-2
21 Aug 2026, 08:0427,100first reading

Engagement

352 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.11%
avg views ÷ 27,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.816%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
142
of 352 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 141 of 142 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held352 (5 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total273,671
Reactions total2,232
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 05:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12,100
Videos
4,650
Links
5,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
34m 28s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 95 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,976 reactions across 349 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1,19820.0%
😱1,16919.6%
👍1,03617.3%
🤣62110.4%
🤡5128.57%
3085.15%
👎3005.02%
💩1712.86%
🤔1302.18%
🔥1292.16%
🙈1151.92%
🙏931.56%
🕊861.44%
custom 5409008750893734809851.42%
custom 521081851151701066290.151%
🤓90.151%
🤩50.084%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 349 of the 352 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,976 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 352 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
11.1%
39 of 352 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
39
posts carrying an erid · 29 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,970
over 39 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,090
over 312 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvvGk5g69 August 202630 August 2026
2VtzqxNwmxW67 August 202628 August 2026
2VtzqupfsoH117 August 202617 August 2026
2VtzqutjnZG17 August 20267 August 2026
2Vtzquzi64A110 August 202610 August 2026
2VtzquzskJX117 August 202617 August 2026
2VtzqvCmj6j129 August 202629 August 2026
2VtzqvFTCQL119 September 202619 September 2026
2VtzqvR4VJ2119 August 202619 August 2026
2VtzqvTJqjw124 August 202624 August 2026
2VtzqvfirPV115 August 202615 August 2026
2VtzqvjtSao13 September 20263 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 17 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 352 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 20:09 UTC765 views12 reactionsread 24 September 2026

У кого-нибудь есть премиум? 📱

💩4🤡4👍1👎1🔥1🙏1

23 Sept 2026, 18:28 UTC≈1,160 views23 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Утильсбор снова идёт в рост — с 1 января 2027 года в России ставки подскочат ещё на 20%‼️ Минпромторг уже официально подтвердил: плановая индексация не остановится, а продолжит набирать обороты. Так что держитесь крепче — цены на автомобили снова готовятся к прыжку, а кошельки — к лёгкой встряске. Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

🤬172🤣2🤡1😱1

23 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,400 views20 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

В Калининграде 51‑летнюю женщину заключили под стражу из‑за смертельного ДТП‼️ Напомним, что 20 сентября она в пьяном виде сбила на Советском проспекте мужчину на электровелосипеде и уехала с места аварии. на контроле у надзорного ведомства. Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

👍19👎1

23 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,580 views13 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

ГАИ просит очевидцев откликнуться по факту ДТП, после которого велосипедист скрылся с места происшествия‼️ 22 сентября на Ленинском проспекте «маршрутный автобус марки «МАЗ» под управлением 52-летнего водителя, которому не уступил дорогу неустановленный велосипедист, движущийся впереди в попутном направлении менявший траекторию движения, допустив столкновение с автобусом, в результате экстренного торможения произошл

😱7🤬51

23 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,410 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Forwarded from @incidentkldPhoto

В Калининграде пропал 11‑летний мальчик из Чкаловска — его не могут найти с 22 сентября. Приметы: рост 146 см, худощавый, светло‑русые короткие волосы. Был одет в чёрную кофту, белое поло, чёрные джинсы и синие кроссовки с белой подошвой. Если вы что‑то знаете о нём, позвоните по телефонам: • 8 (4012) 50‑80‑38 • 8 (4012) 52‑04‑44 Читайте НАС: 📲MAX 📱ВКонтакте

🙏8😱5🔥1custom 52108185115170106621

23 Sept 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,680 views9 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Утром на Каштановой Аллее водитель СИМа, двигаясь по проезжей части допустил наезд на припарированный а/м «Мазда», после чего допустил падение на а/м «Форд». ❗️В результате ДТП водитель электросамоката получил телесные повреждения. Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

🤬7👍2

23 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,680 views23 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Вот как таких называть?! Омская улица - односторонняя от Багратиона до б. Хмельницкого📍 Еще и возмущаются, почему их не пропускают. Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

🤬20🙈21

23 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,760 views6 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🤡21👍1🔥1🤔1

23 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,830 views29 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

На днях на заправке наблюдали вот такую картину - подъезжает на заправку авто, на переднем пассажирском двое детей, непристегнутых… Вопросы к водителю имеются😡 Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

🤡17🤬8😱31

22 Sept 2026, 16:56 UTC≈2,150 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Сегодня в Полесском районе водитель а/м «Ауди» допустил наезд на дорожное ограждение и съехал в кювет‼️ ❗️В результате ДТП водитель автомобиля погиб на месте происшествия. Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

😱14🤬1

22 Sept 2026, 15:48 UTC≈2,160 views22 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Forwarded from @guryevskPhoto

С уважением отношусь к пожилым…НО!! Почему ж вы не думаете головой, переходя дорогу на «красный»?! Жить надоело?! Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

👍16🤡31👎1🤔1

22 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,370 views22 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Кадры смертельного ДТП попади в объектив видео регистратора📸 Водитель а/м «Хендай», выехавший на встречку, скончался на месте ДТП Читайте нас: 📲MAX | 📱Вконтакте

😱18🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 352 posts we hold for @autoclub_kld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ЯНТАРНЫЙ ДЛБ (Новости Калининграда)
@amberdlb · 112,506
#1
Сердце Балтики Калининград
@baltic_kld · 7,415
#2
Калининград №1
@kenig01 · 25,268
#3
Калининград с огоньком
@kaliningradtop · 39,304
#4
Новости Калининграда
@kaliningrad_tut · 52,808
#5
Сообщество автомобилистов Калининградской области
@avt39 · 20,658
#6
Госавтоинспекция 39
@gibdd39 · 5,906
#7
КЕСКА
@keskainfo · 3,971
#8
МВД 39
@mvd39 · 4,778
#9
Калининград ЧП
@kaliningrad_chp · 10,428
#10
Каскад.тв
@kaskad_tv · 8,544
#11
КП Калининград | Новости региона
@kpkld · 6,027
#12
Подслушано Гурьевск
@guryevsk · 7,005
#13
МЧС Калининградской области
@mchs39 · 3,934
#14
❗️ Русский Запад - Ruwest.ru
@ruwestru · 7,968
#15
Нетипичный Калининград 🔞
@kaliningrad_online · 6,957
#16
Балтийский рубеж
@baltiknews · 2,328
#17
Вести. Калининград
@gtrk_kaliningrad · 7,659
#18
Мой Гурьевск
@mygurievsk · 2,855
#19
Инцидент Советск
@incidentsovetsk · 5,850
#20
Калининград.Ru
@kaliningradru · 26,693
#21
Extreme39
@extreme39 · 4,206
#22
Калининград и Ко
@klgdiko · 3,745
#23
RUGRAD - Новости Калининграда, аналитика, видео
@rugrad · 5,003
#24
ЧП БАЛТИЙСК
@cpbaltiysk · 8,620
#25
Кстати, Калининград
@kaliningradkstati · 2,249
#26
Вкратце l Калининград!
@vkratce_kaliningrad · 14,544
#27
Инцидент | Калининград
@incident_kld · 2,653
#28
Клопс
@klops_news · 122,639
#29
Amber Mash
@amber_mash · 40,757
#30
Nelegaly_39
@nelegaly_3939 · 9,123
#31
Алексей Беспрозванных. Калининград
@besprozvannih · 56,477
#32
Новости Калининграда и Области
@kaliningrad_smi · 42,917
#33
Администрация Калининграда
@klgdcity · 6,573
#34
Подслушано Балтийск
@baltiysk_over · 7,003
#35
Работа в Калининграде
@vakansiiKaliningrad · 4,856
#36
Пионерский городской округ
@pionerskijgo · 2,124
#37
Афиша Калининграда
@afisha_kaliningrad · 15,289
#38
Гурьевский округ
@gurievskonline · 1,613
#39
АНОНС 39 • Афиша Калининград
@anons39 · 28,083
#40
Механыч.рф Канал
@mehanych · 1,001
#41
СОВЕТ
@home_creative_studio · 3,746
#42
Калининградский зоопарк
@kldzoo · 10,142
#43
Фонд капремонта КО
@fkr_39 · 4,019
#44
Подслушано Б. Исаково
@bolshoe_isakovo_39 · 5,077
#45
Прокуратура Калининградской области
@prokuratura39 · 2,442
#46
БАЛТРАЙОН | КАЛИНИНГРАД
@balt_kld · 2,845
#47
Черняховск Главный
@glavche · 7,151
#48
Западный филиал РАНХиГС
@zfranhigs · 2,553
#49
Светлогорск и Пионерский подслушано
@svetlogorsk_pio · 10,491
#50
Зеленоградск подслушано
@zlk_overhear · 17,593
#51
ФК «Балтика»
@fc_baltika · 45,268
#52
ВК «Локомотив» (Калининградская область)
@vc_loko · 12,082
#53
Елена Дятлова
@diatlova39 · 1,879
#54
IO
@iOnightclub · 5,032
#55
Куршская коса🫎
@kursh_kosa · 4,850
#56
Buroshka
@buroshka39 · 37,109
#57

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЯНТАРНЫЙ ДЛБ (Новости Калининграда)
@amberdlb · 112,506
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
Новости Калининграда
@kaliningrad_tut · 52,808
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
Калининград с огоньком
@kaliningradtop · 39,304
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
Калининград №1
@kenig01 · 25,268
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
Buroshka
@buroshka39 · 37,109
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 1 September 2026
Клопс
@klops_news · 122,639
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
Новости Калининграда и Области
@kaliningrad_smi · 42,917
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 28 August 2026
Калининград.Ru
@kaliningradru · 26,693
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
pro калининград
@lookkenig · 31,233
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Amber Mash
@amber_mash · 40,757
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Алексей Беспрозванных. Калининград
@besprozvannih · 56,477
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Балтийский форпост
@balt4post · 47,133
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Автоканал Калининград” (@autoclub_kld), 27,092 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/autoclub_kld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.