Channel
@automationop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
67subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001249396997 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @automationop |
| Created | 12 February 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/automationop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 67 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 68 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 68 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
19 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 73.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 26.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2021 to 19 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я рад, что есть примерно десять человек... (уверен, около половины, выбравший второй вариант просто решили ответить "правильно", а не так как считают на самом деле, но ничего, я вас наверное перевоспитаю) ... считают, что будущее, все-таки, за грамотными программистами, а не за кодерами 😎 И у меня есть много интересных примеров, демонстрирующих как понимание того, что внутри, может ускорить работу программы. Один…
👍5
Голосуем (как обычно... ...честно и анонимно)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ну что же... Кому интересно ролик посмотрели... хотелось бы обсудить один аспект... (НЕ посмотревшие, но желающие обсудить - тоже можно, контекст от ролика не зависит 😎) Мы берём систему на базе "Эльбрус", подбираем примерно сопоставимую по частоте систему... 🤔... да тот же Intel... Берём стандартный софт, собираем и получаем провал с точки зрения производительности (ну, не совсем провал, но по соотношению цена-ка…
👍3
А что вы знаете про Эльбрус? 🏔🤔 Нет, не про этот. ... про тот, который 🖥... Уверен, что мало чего хорошего кроме того, что это... унылое 💩, позор нашей микроэлектроники, который уступает интелам даже десятилетней давности, а стоит как крыло от самолёта и т.д. ...нечто устаревшее уже при рождении, чем сильно сложно гордиться. Это проект с нелёгкой судьбой, имеющий свои недостатки, но, тем не менее, обладающий несом…
👍6🔥5
Всем Hi! А вот, интересно, имеет смысл отрефакторить этот канал и продолжить сюда что-то писать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥Аирдроп IBT стартовал! 💥 3…2…1… Поехали! Сегодня мы начинаем аирдроп и запускаем чат-бот, в котором будет происходить весь процесс. Все желающие смогут сделать первые шаги к получению 4 IBT (эквивалент $20,1500 руб, 500 грн), а после запуска платформы — получить эти токены на свои стейкинговые адреса. 💸 Это ваш шанс бесплатно получить токены перспективной GameFi-вселенной, лично попробовать стейкинг до 25% в меся…
Добрый день всем! Прошло последнее заседание первого тура студенческой конференции АИТ-2021. Желающим можно ознакомиться с докладами здесь: https://youtu.be/Xlk-kb79iYs
Добрый день всем! Прошло третье заседание студенческой конференции АИТ-2021. При желании можно ознакомиться с докладами здесь: Добрый день, уважаемые коллеги! Если есть желание ознакомиться с докладами вчерашнего заседания АИТ-2021, это можно сделать здесь: Добрый день! Для желающих выложил запись вчерашнего заседания: https://youtu.be/unuvx9uozoc
Добрый день всем! Прошло второе заседание студенческой конференции АИТ-2021. При желании ознакомиться с докладами можно здесь: https://youtu.be/FlyVXdmsF74
Добрый день всем! Вчера прошел первый день заседания студенческой конференции АИТ-2021. Если у кого есть желание ознакомиться с докладами, это можно сделать здесь: https://youtu.be/1d_yDaI7HOM . Впереди еще три дня заседаний и около пятидесяти докладов 😎
Для нынешнего второго курса записал видеоурок по статическому и динамическому подключению DLL-библиотек в Windows с примером поддержки плагинов, когда основное приложение не знает конкретного типа и реализации функций в классах, описанных в плагинах. Получилось на 2,5 часа, но тем, кому в прошлом году такого не давал, может быть интересно... https://youtu.be/-92-INUnKV8
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @automationop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Голосуем (как обычно... ...честно и анонимно)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Всем Hi! А вот, интересно, имеет смысл отрефакторить этот канал и продолжить сюда что-то писать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2021 to 19 May 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Operation "Automation" 🇷🇺” (@automationop), 67 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/automationop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.