Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aveo

Channel

Aveo

@aveocs

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

56,897subscribers

+1,028 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001617028193
TypeChannel
Username@aveocs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aveocs

Growth

55,66756,89756,2827 August 2026 — 55,869 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,869 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,856 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,791 subscribers11 August 2026 — 55,762 subscribers12 August 2026 — 55,742 subscribers13 August 2026 — 55,693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55,667 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55,689 subscribers17 August 2026 — 56,299 subscribers18 August 2026 — 56,300 subscribers19 August 2026 — 56,522 subscribers20 August 2026 — 56,654 subscribers21 August 2026 — 56,694 subscribers22 August 2026 — 56,674 subscribers24 August 2026 — 56,610 subscribers25 August 2026 — 56,606 subscribers26 August 2026 — 56,674 subscribers27 August 2026 — 56,849 subscribers28 August 2026 — 56,868 subscribers29 August 2026 — 56,897 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net +1,028. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,483–57,082 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 18:2556,897+29
28 Aug 2026, 15:5856,868+19
27 Aug 2026, 18:1456,849+175
26 Aug 2026, 16:3456,674+68
25 Aug 2026, 14:0756,606-4
24 Aug 2026, 12:4556,610-64
22 Aug 2026, 21:5856,674-20
21 Aug 2026, 11:3256,694+40
20 Aug 2026, 07:5456,654+132
19 Aug 2026, 11:0656,522+222
18 Aug 2026, 13:5356,300+1
17 Aug 2026, 13:4756,299+610
16 Aug 2026, 08:4455,689+22
14 Aug 2026, 22:1655,667-26
13 Aug 2026, 11:1455,693-49
12 Aug 2026, 08:1255,742-20
11 Aug 2026, 06:5855,762-29
10 Aug 2026, 05:4155,791-36
9 Aug 2026, 06:4255,827-29
8 Aug 2026, 04:5455,856first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 56,897 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,090
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held44 (22 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total327,380
Reactions total4,965
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7,008 reactions across 44 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,19459.8%
🔥1,16116.6%
❤‍🔥78211.2%
👍2092.98%
😭1071.53%
🍾961.37%
😢821.17%
😱640.913%
💔630.899%
😁500.713%
🏆470.671%
440.628%
🎉340.485%
🤯230.328%
🥰180.257%
130.186%
😍100.143%
🎅90.128%
🎄20.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,008reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
124
across the posts below
Posts paid on
43
of 44 we hold a reading for · 98%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aveocs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈3,800 views180 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Розыгрыш бабочки за 40 000 с GGDROP 🔪 Разыгрываем эту сучку: ★ Butterfly Knife | Urban Masked 🩸 Для участия: ➖ Подпишись на GGDROP; ➖ Прожми кнопку "Участвовать". ❗️ Итоги через 7 дней. Всем удачи !

130❤‍🔥27🍾18🎉5

28 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈4,600 views107 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Матч появился в открытом доступе для всех, видимо считали стату в ручную я хз, но главное что он появился 😌 Все кто не верил ебало А улучшить свои скины, ты можешь на ❤ UPGRADER

103❤‍🔥2🏆2

27 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC≈5,510 views98 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Напишите в комменты свои предложения: "Какие рекорды можно поставить на фейсите" (Естественно постановочные) И какими способами можно забанить фейсит аккаунт 🥇 А улучшить свои скины, ты можешь на ❤ UPGRADER

91👍5❤‍🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈5,600 views92 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Запотели с пацанам ради победы 😂😂😂😂🔝🔝🔝🔝 А улучшить свои скины, ты можешь на ❤ UPGRADER

84🤯5🏆3

27 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈6,100 views320 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

🥇🥇🥇 На данный момент это рекордсмен по просмотрам за сутки (вроде), так что с вас пятсос тыщ лайков сюда под пост 😊🔝 А улучшить свои скины, ты можешь на ❤ UPGRADER

271👍34💔73🍾3🎄1😢1

27 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈6,110 views120 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Шёл уже 4й день после "рекорда". Тикет в дискорде с админами до сих пор открытый, никакой реакции и ответа нет. Мало того, что я банально не понимаю, почему матч не засчитывается в открытую статистику, так нас ещё за этот прикол не могут забанить хотябы на недельку 😮 Но в любом случае рано или поздно они скажут в чем причина и я естественно дам вам знать 🚬 если ничего по итогу не будет я из принципов буду творить

113😁5🤯2

26 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈6,580 views88 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @acenewscsPhoto

🌽🍋🍋‍🟩🍌🍉🥕 В этом розыгрыше тебя ждёт четыре брутальных ножа из дамасской стали. Все ножи разные и какой-то один из них может стать твоим! Какой тебе нравится больше? А какой больше нравится богу рандома? Узнаешь только после того, как нажмешь кнопку для участия. 1. ★ Huntsman Knife | Damascus Steel 2. ★ Paracord Knife | Damascus Steel 3. ★ Falchion Knife | Damascus Steel 4. ★ Bowie Knife | Damascus Steel Условия мак

👍6312🍾3🔥3😱3🏆2💔2

26 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈6,990 views45 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Новый видос, как все это происходило на самом деле, с вас лайк и коммент кто с тг ❤️ https://youtu.be/BSh34oxkeVE ССЫЛКА НА ИГРУ А улучшить свои скины, ты можешь на ❤ UPGRADER

43🍾2

25 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈7,620 views110 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Завтра делаем "прокачки" на стриме, посмотрим на вашу активность Если даст плоды - перейдём на постоянную основу с ними, а для игровых стримов на 2м канале буду скоро транслировать, обнял всех ❤️ А улучшить свои скины, ты можешь на ❤ UPGRADER

99👍7🔥2💔1😭1

25 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈3,510 views72 reactions6 Starsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @swooshbossPhoto

💎БОЛЬШОЙ РОЗЫГРЫШ НА 4000$ Условия: 🔵Быть подписанным на тг SWOOSH 🔵Использовать промокод SWOOSH при пополнении любой суммы на MYCSGO от 18.08.2026 по 18.09.2026 🔵Поставить реакцию на пост 🔵Нажать кнопку "Участвовать" 1-10 место за пополнение по промокоду 11-20 места за участие в розыгрыше без пополнения 1-3 места будут распределены по сумме депа (подробнее) 1 место - M4A1-S | Добро пожаловать в джунгли 800$ 2 ме

❤‍🔥5211🔥6💔2🍾1

24 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈8,860 views157 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

😮😮😮 Катка правда не показывается в стате, пока ждём ответа админов.. А улучшить свои скины, ты можешь на ❤ UPGRADER

122😱25🎉7🤯2🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈10,400 views94 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. LaIRoN (@laironTR) 2. d (@daqw1z) 3. Hod (@karantinka) ✔️Проверить результаты

😢7012😭11💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @aveocs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 714,499 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tweek
@tweekgg · 126,053
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Делайтик 💬
@delighttg · 116,989
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
ONLY CS2 · Counter-Strike 2
@csgo4love · 132,674
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aveo” (@aveocs), 56,897 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aveocs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.