Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Всратые Авиаконструкторы

Channel

Всратые Авиаконструкторы

@aviamemes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,710subscribers

+163 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001659192801
TypeChannel
Username@aviamemes
Created23 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aviamemes

Growth

9,5479,7109,628.56 August 2026 — 9,547 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,547 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,551 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,552 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,609 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,646 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,683 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,697 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,704 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,710 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net +163. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,523–9,734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 12:589,710+6
1 Sept 2026, 07:059,704+7
29 Aug 2026, 09:279,697+14
26 Aug 2026, 11:189,683+37
23 Aug 2026, 13:049,646+37
20 Aug 2026, 07:359,609+57
10 Aug 2026, 03:419,552+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:149,551+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:509,547no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:359,547first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.5%
avg views ÷ 9,710 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,040
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held37 (14 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total105,580
Reactions total2,814
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,820 reactions across 35 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,06444.9%
1,30119.1%
🔥4496.58%
🤣3575.23%
👍2934.30%
🍌2393.50%
😱2053.01%
🤔1792.62%
💯1742.55%
😭1041.52%
981.44%
❤‍🔥831.22%
🤯670.982%
🥰560.821%
👏130.191%
👀120.176%
👎100.147%
🤩100.147%
🦄90.132%
💅80.117%
21 further kinds891.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈4,420 views113 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№270826-1. Boeing.

😁91🔥14💯41🍌1👍1👾1

Signed vsratbot

26 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈2,930 views143 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№260826-2. Никакой тряски

🔥87😁31🤣14🤔42🍌2🤨2👍1

Signed vsratbot

26 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,070 views173 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№ 260826-1. Часики где

😁15112🍌6🍓2👍1🤔1

Signed vsratbot

23 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈7,760 views383 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#КлассическиеМемы

247👍98😁26🔥9🍌2🤔1

Signed vsratbot

22 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈4,950 views82 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @MAIuniversity

Более 10000 машин вышли с конвейера Улан-Удэнского авиационного завода за всю историю его существования. Когда-то в этих цехах изготавливали и самолёты, но основная специализация сегодня — производство вертолётов серии Ми-8. Увидеть волшебство превращения отдельных деталей в многотонный летающий транспорт, нам удалось в рамках проекта «Один день в...» 🤓 Созданный в 1939 году У-УАЗ до сих пор остаётся одним из ведущи

54👍17🤡5❤‍🔥2🤔2🍌1🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈6,830 views207 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№210826-1. Кастую помпаж

😁151😱39🍌6👀63👍1🤔1

Signed vsratbot

19 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈6,640 views238 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№ 190826-1. Альтушки — фанатки Wellington

🔥122😁948👍7💯3👏2🍌1👾1

Signed vsratbot

18 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC≈5,870 views85 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В любом самолёте летят четыре разных человека. И один из них сейчас читает этот пост. Первый прилипает к иллюминатору на взлёте и в свои тридцать пять всё ещё немного пацан. Второй сжимает подлокотник и делает вид, что читает. Третий на глаз отличает A320 от 737 и слегка этим гордится. Четвёртому просто интересно, почему билет туда стоил пять тысяч, а обратно пятнадцать. Я пилот, и мой канал — для всех четверых. П

53🍌13👍9💩7🍓1👏1🤔1

18 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈5,440 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Классический экспириенс Всратых Авиаконструкторов Наш паблик ВК: https://vk.ru/aviamemes Для адептов ВК Мессенджера Наш канал ВК: https://vk.ru/im/channels/-233069602 Для самых модных и современных Наш канал ТГ: https://t.me/aviamemes Для элитариев с возможностью получать мемы на почту и донат в обход ВК Наш Sponsr: https://sponsr.ru/aviamemes Для любителей поиграть Наш Дискорд: https://discord.gg/jweHBS2ce Задо

🥰26🍌3🤔1

Signed vsratbot

18 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈21,300 views318 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№180826-1. Исторически достоверные аниме декали

😁236🔥51🍌139🤩4💊3🤔1🤣1

Signed vsratbot

17 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈5,600 views247 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№ 170826-1. Ты больше не нишевый.

😁20919😭14💔3🍌2

Signed vsratbot

13 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈7,090 views114 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

№ 130826-1. Время видел? Аварийное покидание.

❤‍🔥81🥰18😁11🍌3👍1

Signed vsratbot

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @aviamemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Расследования авиакатастроф
@rumayday · 29,845
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
Авиадиспетчер
@aviadispet4er · 34,415
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
Москвич на Москвичах
@moskvichonmoskvich · 37,860
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Игорь Негода
@igornegodastartuem · 38,978
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Коты и кошка Крамника
@kramnikcat · 39,262
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Всратые Авиаконструкторы” (@aviamemes), 9,710 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aviamemes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.