Channel
@avv_giulia_monte
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,203subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001694930461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @avv_giulia_monte |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/avv_giulia_monte |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 1,203 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 1,205 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 1,206 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 1,207 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 1,208 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 1,209 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 1,209 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
297 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 133 | 44.8% | |
| 👏 | 82 | 27.6% | |
| ❤ | 60 | 20.2% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 4.04% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 2.36% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.673% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.337% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Assolutamente da condividere anche con non iscritti 👇 Tik Tok https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8JUEoo1/ YouTube https://youtube.com/shorts/lXA5xX85MVc?is=5wddRO7oORih_7ZV! 👇 Sotto trovi articolo e moduli https://www.siulm.it/blog/articles/siulm-e-avv-giulia-monte-ricorso-previdenza-dedicata-e-complementare
❤2🤔1
Foto da Giulia
👏6
AGGIORNAMENTO: La Corte di Giustizia UE (C-522/24) sul caso del militare italiano sospeso per essersi rifiutato di vaccinarsi contro il SARS-CoV-2 dà purtroppo torto al ricorrente su tutti e tre i fronti. La differenza di trattamento tra personale militare (soggetto a obbligo) e civile (esentato) non è discriminazione ai sensi della direttiva 2000/78: si basa sulla categoria professionale, motivo non coperto dalla no…
😢10❤2
Da decenni l’Italia, come gran parte dell’Occidente, vive un declino economico, sociale, politico e culturale. Questo volume prova a interrogarsi su come invertire la rotta, attraverso politiche radicalmente diverse da quelle degli ultimi quarant’anni. Non offre verità assolute, ma spunti per il dialogo, il confronto e la costruzione di nuove idee e collaborazioni. L’invito è rivolto a tutti coloro che hanno a cuo…
🤔1
https://nonsolomarescialli.it/vittoria-del-siulm-aeronautica-annullate-le-decurtazioni-di-anzianita-il-siulm-aeronautica-ottiene-lannullamento-delle-decurtazioni-di-anzianita-per-i-militari-sospesi-per-obbligo-vaccinale-decisi
👏13👍5❤3
Foto da Silvia
Segnalo interessante evento
👍1
*Lunedì 18 maggio ore 19:00* Hotel Bologna - Mestre si terrà un importante _incontro pubblico_ promosso da *Resistere Veneto.* Interverranno: Riccardo Szumski e Davide Lovat consiglieri regionali, Stefano Puzzer con Ass.ne La Gente Come Noi, Dario Giacomini con Associazione Contiamoc, Danilo Leo Lazzarini storico veneziano, Roberto Cherubino con Sindacato FISI, Stefano Paesante con Patto Autonomia Veneto. Modera V…
👍4👏4
Ricorso gerarchico accolto per un militare da me assistito Il Direttore Generale per il Personale Militare, con decreto del 7 maggio 2026, ha accolto il ricorso gerarchico avverso un rapporto informativo, annullando il documento caratteristico e disponendo la redazione di una nuova scheda valutativa. Nel provvedimento di accoglimento, la Direzione Generale ha ritenuto fondata la censura di contraddittorietà manifesta…
👍13👏9❤2
TAR VENETO NUOVA SENTENZA Del 5 gennaio 2026 Cancellata detrazione anzianità per i militari SIULM sospesi https://www.siulm.it/blog/articles/tar-veneto-cancella-la-detrazione-di-anzianita Iscriviti al nostro canale Telegram 👇 https://t.me/SiNDACATOSIULM Iscriviti al Sindacato Siulm www.siulm.it
👏15👍3❤2
https://www.siulm.it/blog/articles/detrazioni-anzianita-un-risultato-concreto-per-i-militari Iscriviti al nostro canale Siulm👇 https://t.me/SiNDACATOSIULM
👏7
Se dovesse comparire ancora questo messaggio o similari, non sono io ovviamente. Ho già provveduto a segnalare l'accaduto alle autorità competenti.
👍17❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @avv_giulia_monte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Avv. Giulia Monte” (@avv_giulia_monte), 1,203 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avv_giulia_monte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.