Channel
@awagar2025
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
118subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002380930536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @awagar2025 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/awagar2025 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 118 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 120 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 120 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😍 | 9 | 30.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 26.7% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вечер субботы удался 😍 🦋 Встретились с любимыми девочками – одноклассницам. Уже много лет у нас традиция – раз в год, летом обязательно собраться вместе. В кафешке, на даче... Неважно. Главное наобщаться, посплетничать (обсудить мужей, детей, болячки 🤪, внуками и пушистиками похвастаться), может поплясать. Короче набраться приятных эмоций и на год зарядиться энергией ❤ 🦋 Стали свидетелями таджикской свадьбы 💞 Потом…
🤩2👍1
Хотя, не всё так однозначно. Иногда вот сядешь. Посмотришь на эту жизнь... И невольно о смысле задумаешься ❓ #СемёнСемёныч
🤣2😁2
У этого товарища на днях день рождения! Жирненькое пузико ☕️ – девятилетний пенсионер на заслуженном отдыхе ❤️. Даже немножко завидно. Мне бы ни о чём не думать 🦋, а не вот это вот всё #СемёнСемёныч
👍2🎉1😁1
Да, нынче не промышленные масштабы 🤷♀️ В прошлом году перцев как сливы было – немерено! Лечо, маринованые, замороженые кружочками, дольками и перемолотые. Тока фаршированых было 4 ящика в морозильнике! В этом всего по чуть-чуть посажено. Лечо делать не из чего. Но ручки чешутся – хоть малость чего-нибудь заготовить хочется. Даньку спать уложила и чуток похозяйничала. Пару порций нафаршировала на зиму. Жопки перем…
👍5
Какие у нас во дворе тётеньки и бабушки замечательные! Смотрите какую красоту сделали 🌸🌸🌸 И каждый день ходят, полют, поливают. Машины и пешеходов разгоняют – бдят 🧐, чтоб, не дай бог, их труды не вытоптали. ⁉️ А у вас дворы красивые? С клумбами? Кто за ними ухаживает?
❤4😍4
А ещё у нас сегодня была радуга. Огромная! На полнебушка. В это время свет и небо желтели. На фотке дом в нашем дворе, он ващета розовый 👌. Видео не моё (Центр города из новостного канала). Но посмотрите, там тоже воздух желтоватый. И даже трава и асфальт жёлтые. Причём, буквально через 5 минут прогулки, радуга изчезла. Небо поголубело. Воздух стал прозрачным. А солнышко стремительно спать отправилось...
😍5❤1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @awagar2025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настя & Ко: Хроники бывшего директора” (@awagar2025), 118 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awagar2025.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.