Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ♥️.

Channel

♥️.

@awene_t0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,251subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001199811218
TypeChannel
Username@awene_t0
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/awene_t0

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2511,2741,262.57 August 2026 — 1,274 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,274 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,270 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,269 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,263 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,262 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,260 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,258 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,257 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,252 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,251 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,248–1,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:001,251-1
11 Sept 2026, 08:371,252-5
6 Sept 2026, 11:351,257-1
2 Sept 2026, 06:521,258-2
27 Aug 2026, 12:051,260-2
24 Aug 2026, 08:421,262-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:251,263-6
17 Aug 2026, 10:441,269-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:181,270-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:001,274no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:591,274first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4050.6%
👍3240.5%
👎45.06%
😢22.53%
🔥11.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2022 to 28 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2023, 11:09 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.

21 Apr 2023, 11:27 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.

15 Jan 2023, 23:22 UTC≈3,560 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

لە سەر ئێشە و ئازاز و خەم زیاتر هیچت پێ نەبەخشیم💔«

6

15 Jan 2023, 23:19 UTC≈3,420 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ئێستا کە لێرە نیت هیچ شتێک لە شوێنی خۆی نییە✨:

2

15 Jan 2023, 23:04 UTC≈2,290 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هاوشێوەی تۆ بۆ من نەبوو هاوشێوەی من بۆ تۆ زۆر هەبوو🖤.

1

15 Jan 2023, 23:00 UTC≈2,340 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تەواوی ژیانم ڕەشە ، ڕەشی دونیا بە من چی🖤.

2🔥1

13 Jan 2023, 20:00 UTC≈2,390 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بە ئاهێکی ساردەوە هەموو شتێکم داوەتە دەست خوا🖤`

👍7

13 Jan 2023, 19:55 UTC≈2,250 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هەر خۆی من شەنسم هەبوایە توشی تۆ نەئەبووم🖤:

😢1

13 Jan 2023, 19:53 UTC≈2,170 viewsread 7 August 2026

سەخت تێپەڕی تا تێگەیشتم خۆشت نەویستووم🖤:)

13 Jan 2023, 00:02 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 7 August 2026

نزای ڕوحمت لەگەڵ بێت تا شەوان تێر نەخەویت🖤!

30 Oct 2022, 05:56 UTC≈2,850 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @qafaze_kchikPhoto

نە هەواڵی كەس ئەپرسم ؛ نە خەمی دوونیامە ، هەتا پێم بكرێت بۆ دوور ئەڕوانم هەتا پێم بكرێت دەست لە شتەكان بەر ئەدەم هەتا پێم بكرێت سەرقاڵی تەنیایی ئەبم ماوەیەكە تێگەیشتووم ژیان بە من رێك و پێك نابێت ، تێگەیشتووم ژیان بەجۆرێك ڕژاوە بەمن كۆ نابێتەوە...

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @awene_t0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“♥️.” (@awene_t0), 1,251 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awene_t0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.