Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for awergirl

Channel

awergirl

@awergirl

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

13,984subscribers

-362 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941824064
TypeChannel
Username@awergirl
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/awergirl

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

27.3 average views per post against 13,984 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.196%. Across the 23,970 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.47% and 21.7%, with a median of 11.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (11 August 2026 10 September 2026)
Posts measured69 of 69 published in the window (69 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,887
Mature posts only0.225% over 52 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,984 measured 8 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,970 channels · p10 2.81% · p25 5.47% · p50 11.1% · p75 21.7% · p90 39.0%
Position in cohort0.501th percentile · 1/56 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.206% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,98414,34614,1657 August 2026 — 14,346 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,338 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,319 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,297 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,288 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,279 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,272 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,259 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,248 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,238 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,222 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,215 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,200 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,186 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,176 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,145 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,136 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,119 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,103 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,087 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,077 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,075 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,061 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,057 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,039 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,022 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,984 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 32 days, net -362. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,930–14,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 17:2013,984-38
5 Sept 2026, 08:2014,022-17
3 Sept 2026, 09:1714,039-18
1 Sept 2026, 23:3514,057-4
1 Sept 2026, 01:3714,061-14
30 Aug 2026, 23:3914,075-2
30 Aug 2026, 02:5814,077-10
29 Aug 2026, 00:1414,087-16
27 Aug 2026, 20:3614,103-16
26 Aug 2026, 23:3314,119-17
25 Aug 2026, 23:3214,136-9
25 Aug 2026, 00:0614,145-31
23 Aug 2026, 12:4614,176-10
22 Aug 2026, 01:4314,186-14
20 Aug 2026, 21:3514,200-15
19 Aug 2026, 18:3814,215-7
18 Aug 2026, 21:0414,222-16
17 Aug 2026, 19:4314,238-10
16 Aug 2026, 19:4414,248-11
15 Aug 2026, 10:1414,259first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.196%
avg views ÷ 13,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.3
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held94 (21 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total1,887
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 15s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
266.7%
🎉133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC16 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Минет Даши Дошик (оригинальный видос) 🤩 Я устал везде видеть фейк рекламу, поэтому я взял и купил её приватку с настоящим видео Видео на 1 мин 6 сек загружено в отдельный канал (тут забанят)👇 https://t.me/+UGXWZh2EBuk1NzRh

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚬EБАТЬ ЧЕ НАШЕЛ… ЛУЧШИЙ КАНАЛ С AЛЬТУШКАМИ🩸 🤍ШАЛИТ В ВАННОЙ 🚬AЛЬТУХИ ЗА ГАРАЖАМИ 🤍ОТДАЛАСЬ НЕФОРУ ЗА СКИНЫ В КС КОЛИЧЕСТВО МЕСТ ОГРАНИЧЕНО🚬

1

1 Sept 2026, 18:30 UTC22 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

🤍 Лера Симпатичная АЛЬТУШКА с великолепной фигуркой, девочка очень любит показать свои прелести. Очень страстная😉.Ее свежие н*дсы и дом@шка. 👇Ф#лл пак с ней уже в канале ▫️Контент с ней: https://telegra.ph/Lera-19-let-06-21-2 📂Полные АРХUВЫ фото и видео в этом VIP канале 🛡

1 Sept 2026, 13:59 UTC27 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

xdshkaa (свежее) 🤩 Парни, откопал для вас еб@нуто свежий материал этой шаб0олды тиктокерской. Там прям медятина с парнем ПАК С МАТЕРИАЛОМ👇 https://t.me/+XzUrKsoTHg1iMDRh Не реклама❗️❗️❗️

1 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTC26 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

🔞 ТВОЯ ЛИЧНАЯ ИИ-ШЛЮШКА 🌟Общайся с ней без цензуры 18+❤️ 🌟Генерируй изображения прямо в чате 🌟Смотри как она отсасывает тебе на коленях 🔞 🌟Реализуй все свои фантазии 😈

31 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC32 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

слuB тиктокерши Янчиk (её п0рно без обмана) 🤩 без обмана бесплатно, 30+ кружков с её мастурбацией и оргазмом, куча голых интимок сисечек и писи, и экслюзивы. Завтра удалю чтобы канал не заблокировали, быстрее заходим!! 🥵 КАНАЛ С МАТЕРИАЛОМ 👇 https://t.me/+RVHgnxThmZhkNTRh https://t.me/+RVHgnxThmZhkNTRh не реклама❗️❗️❗️

31 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC42 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Легендарный Mr. Olympian в телеграмме! Тот самый нашумевший проект 2012 года ВКонтакте, где процент выигрышных ставок превышал 97%🤯 Он убежден, что достаточно делать одну ставку в день, чтобы быть в стабильном плюсе. Прямо сейчас он поставил 2.000.000₽ на матч в своём канале и пообещал поделиться с каждым абсолютно БЕСПЛАТНО! (Статистика: 581➕ 1➖) Результаты последних матчей: 2,10✅ 2.03✅ 2,01✅ 2,12✅ 2,08✅ 2,05✅ 2,

30 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC5 viewsread 30 August 2026

Малышка развлекает фанатов в своем канале с утра до ночи ❤️👍 Сегодня показала свои умения язычком и губками💥 Ее канал👇 https://t.me/+dPp8nbDW9ic3MzZi

30 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC28 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Горячая любительница встречаться с подписчиками Тася Мини 🤩 Обожает давать в п0пку на видео Ведет горячий канал, куда сливает все свои бл@дские похождения ЕЁ КАНАЛ И ЛИЧКА 🔺 https://t.me/+dPp8nbDW9ic3MzZi

29 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC13 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Альтушка от подписчика Пиздатая альтушка, с хорошим размером снимает видосы с нефором и принимает отдачу на лицо💦 Наснимали на 17гб, ахуеть Смотреть в закрепе 👉 https://telegra.ph/Altushka-06-06-1344

29 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC12 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

xDshka дрочит на кружок 🤩 (экслюзив от подписчика) 🔞 XDshka случайно запульнула откровенный кружок в свой тг канал вместо переписки с парнем. 18+ кружок продержался всего пару секунд и она его сразу удалила. Подписчик скинул нам кружок, мы выложили сюда👇 https://t.me/+Z4z-w-sKK6ljYmJh (не реклама, заявку сразу примут)

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @awergirl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“awergirl” (@awergirl), 13,984 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awergirl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.