-"و مَنو اليهَتم ؟ و أذا حَزنكَ خنكَ روحكّ"

Channel
شـعر
@axclw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,751subscribers
+392 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002022513321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @axclw |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/axclw |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 12,751 | +33 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 12,718 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:28 | 12,717 | +27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:44 | 12,690 | +20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:45 | 12,670 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 12,671 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 12,652 | +18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 12,634 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 12,624 | +20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 12,604 | +25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 12,579 | +24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 12,555 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 12,546 | +17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 12,529 | +32 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 12,497 | +10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 12,487 | +12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 12,475 | +18 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 12,457 | +25 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 12,432 | +21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 12,411 | first reading |
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.9%
- avg views ÷ 12,751 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,160
- 85 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 85
- of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 183,479 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 6
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 105 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @axclw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
حچيت بّلا قَصد مِن گتلَك ترُوح شَجاك وجاوبَتني نشوفَك بخِير.
أنتِ كَالسَماءِ خُلِقتِ للتَأمُل .
اصبحنا و اصبح الملك لله
شحَجت عينكّ لـ گِلبي وهيچَ حبيتكٌ ؟
ما يِحبونك بگدي انَه باچي عَليك گد هُوسه ضِحگهم .
يا نَسمه فَجر علمني من تغيب اعيش بيا أَمل لو ما طلع فَجرك ؟
صباح الاستمرارية و التعب ❤️🩹
صَاير مَا تحَن كلش هَل ايام وحَيل تغيرت بيك المَوده .
ولَقد رأيتُك في مَنامِيَ رُؤيةً ما زلتُ أُغمِضُ رَاجيًا تكرارَها.
حَتى ويَ روحي مِن اسولِف نحچي عَنك.
اصبحنا و اصبح الملك لله
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @axclw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wzzww · 35,381
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
@czz3z · 41,147
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
@issss · 36,767
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
@jabaarrashid_T22 · 74,224
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@TSsiS · 76,084
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
@xxifq · 31,288
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@gabbarrasheed · 49,580
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@IATIIUI5 · 57,416
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
@MAKATIB1 · 35,816
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
@ieq4ee · 413,277
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
@Ba6hdad · 110,153
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@aassx22 · 98,378
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
@Ateaf122 · 49,142
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@T_16_7 · 50,459
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
@SSI_NN · 34,068
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
@oeen3 · 68,581
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
@e0lann · 48,944
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@Alkatah · 31,169
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
@Oh_RR · 38,492
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
@TSSiX · 40,352
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شـعر” (@axclw), 12,751 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/axclw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.