Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aynik

Channel

Aynik

@aynik2001

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46,683subscribers

+3,050 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003177469269
TypeChannel
Username@aynik2001
Description@aynikkk **follow me everywhere** https://link.me/aynik #aynik #aynikchannel #aynikvip #aynikfree #aynikpv #aynikorg #aynik2001 #aynikkk
Created17 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aynik2001

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

36,300 average views per post against 46,683 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.7%. Across the 24,245 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.71% and 15.4%, with a median of 6.95%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (2 August 2026 1 September 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled689,550
Mature posts only109.1% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers46,683 measured 1 September 2026
Cohortb31623 · 24,245 channels · p10 0.876% · p25 2.71% · p50 6.95% · p75 15.4% · p90 28.0%
Position in cohort99.423th percentile · 11.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.044% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 1 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

43,63346,68345,15811 August 2026 — 43,633 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,690 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,920 subscribers15 August 2026 — 43,902 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,168 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,355 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,590 subscribers19 August 2026 — 44,638 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,712 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,515 subscribers23 August 2026 — 44,550 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,758 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,208 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,317 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,360 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,372 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,514 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,654 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,683 subscribers11 August 20261 September 2026
19 measurements spanning 20 days, net +3,050. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,176–47,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 03:5646,683+29
31 Aug 2026, 01:2746,654+140
30 Aug 2026, 02:1346,514+142
28 Aug 2026, 22:5546,372+12
28 Aug 2026, 01:1346,360+43
27 Aug 2026, 00:4546,317+1,109
26 Aug 2026, 03:4345,208+450
25 Aug 2026, 00:2844,758+208
23 Aug 2026, 09:3644,550+35
21 Aug 2026, 20:3744,515-197
20 Aug 2026, 17:4444,712+74
19 Aug 2026, 20:0744,638+48
18 Aug 2026, 19:2344,590+235
17 Aug 2026, 18:3544,355+187
16 Aug 2026, 17:4644,168+266
15 Aug 2026, 00:1443,902-18
13 Aug 2026, 17:5643,920+230
12 Aug 2026, 19:0343,690+57
11 Aug 2026, 19:4643,633first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 17 October 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.4%
avg views ÷ 46,683 subscribers
Avg views / post
33,800
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.223%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held31 (17 October 20251 September 2026)
Views total743,160
Reactions total1,654
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
4
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 59s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,781 reactions across 30 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,75135.4%
😱1,05513.6%
💩6498.34%
🔥5306.81%
👍4736.08%
🥰4686.01%
💋4205.40%
👎2533.25%
👏2383.06%
❤‍🔥2072.66%
😁1932.48%
🍌1471.89%
🤮1461.88%
🖕871.12%
😭390.501%
🫡310.398%
😢260.334%
👌140.18%
🎄90.116%
😨80.103%
8 further kinds370.476%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC≈4,820 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026

This is just a backup channel the main channel : اینجا چنل پشتیبانه٫ چنل اصلی اینجاست: https://t.me/ayniktlg

6

1 Sept 2026, 07:07 UTC≈5,210 views29 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Posted without readable text

19👎3🔥3👍2🥰2

1 Sept 2026, 06:59 UTC≈4,880 views15 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ayniktlgVideo

New pictures uploaded Economical option (vip pictures) All content + new pictures ONLY 3$ Do you want to see my p…sy? 🐈 ⬇️ عکس های جدید اضافه شد پیشنهاد اقتصادی تمام محتوا + عکس های جدید فقط ۳ دلار میخوای کوبصمو ببینی ؟؟؟ ⬇️ https://t.me/+IWJwsPygIVszODZk

🍌85💋2

31 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈8,070 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Payment methods: Iban , paypal , cryptocurrency , apple gift cards , stars , website @aynik @aynikkk

6💩4

31 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈8,200 views14 reactionsread 1 September 2026

New videos uploaded right now More than 500 videos + new updates ⬇️ ویدیو جدید همین الان داخل vip بیشتر از ۵۰۰ فیلم + اپدیت ⬇️ https://t.me/+ln-dqYigKcU4ZmFk 🛑پرداخت ریالی برای ورود به VIP : به ربات ریال بزنید رو‌ اکانتتون استارز شارژ میکنه : @Starzify_Bot کد تخفیف: AYNIK

7🐳3💩3👏1

31 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈9,320 views41 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💋15🥰9💩8🔥4😈32

31 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈9,110 views16 reactionsread 1 September 2026

New videos uploaded on the website + free previews Check it out ⬇️ همین الان ویدیو جدید داخل سایت + نمونه رایگان و طولانی ⬇️ (تمام نمونه های رایگان فقط داخل سایت) https://fansly.com/aynikpv

💩16

27 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈14,600 views61 reactionsread 31 August 2026

All my videos 🍓 : https://t.me/+ln-dqYigKcU4ZmFk

21👎17🖕12🤮11

27 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈21,900 views121 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

۱۰ ویژگی مردانه حال بهم ! https://youtu.be/FISmZCoY1qk?si=P4Y6zFgS7cbEN91v

🔥4231🍌26🤮11🥰9👎2

27 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC≈21,600 views69 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🍌27💩2114😁5🥰2

25 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈34,600 views58 reactionsread 1 September 2026

This is just a backup channel the main channel : اینجا چنل پشتیبانه و چنل اصلی: https://t.me/ayniktlg

💩2523🔥9👍1

24 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈34,400 views70 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Do you want to see my p..y ? More than 500 pictures + new updates Only 3$ میخوای کوبصمو ببینی ؟ بیشتر از ۵۰۰ عکس + اپدیت کلا ۳ دلار: https://t.me/+IWJwsPygIVszODZk

💩3429🔥5🤮2

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @aynik2001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 100,452 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aynik” (@aynik2001), 46,683 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aynik2001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.