Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اندیشه آزاد 💡

Channel

اندیشه آزاد 💡

@azadandishan0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,493subscribers

+447 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001046415905
TypeChannel
Username@azadandishan0
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/azadandishan0

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,00210,53310,267.57 August 2026 — 10,046 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,029 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,010 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,002 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,206 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,194 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,129 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,101 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,173 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,154 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,137 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,117 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,134 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,265 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,240 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,226 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,205 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,193 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,180 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,166 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,303 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,307 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,276 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,241 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,401 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,375 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,347 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,533 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,493 subscribers10,4937 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +447. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,922–10,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:0210,493-40
16 Sept 2026, 18:0210,533+186
14 Sept 2026, 22:0010,347-28
13 Sept 2026, 07:1910,375-26
11 Sept 2026, 09:2010,401+160
8 Sept 2026, 15:5710,241-35
5 Sept 2026, 10:5710,276-31
3 Sept 2026, 16:0110,307+4
2 Sept 2026, 10:3310,303+137
1 Sept 2026, 11:1410,166-14
31 Aug 2026, 09:2310,180-13
30 Aug 2026, 10:5810,193-12
29 Aug 2026, 13:5610,205-21
28 Aug 2026, 16:2210,226-14
27 Aug 2026, 18:5410,240-25
26 Aug 2026, 18:1310,265+131
25 Aug 2026, 19:5910,134+17
24 Aug 2026, 20:4510,117-20
23 Aug 2026, 06:3610,137-17
21 Aug 2026, 19:5610,154first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.62%
avg views ÷ 10,493 subscribers
Avg views / post
380
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held45 (21 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total760
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7h 16m
Average length
20m 48s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC357 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Learn_Cast

[نئو]مارکسیسم، انگلی برای تمامی فصول نظریه این است: طبقه/گروه/جمعی در حال استثمار شدن است‌، و این استثمار‌ توسط سازمان/مفهوم/جمعی دیگر به واسطه یک "مفهوم خاص" صورت می‌گیرد. "نظریه انتقادی" بطور خیلی ساده شده، همچین چارچوبی دارد. مارکسیسم کلاسیک، طبقه کارگر را استثمار شونده، سرمایه دار را استثمار کننده، و مفهومی که حاصل از نزاع این دو شکل میگیرد را "سرمایه داری" می‌داند. مارکسیسم کلاسیک بدنبال الغای سرمایه داری و بر…

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

27 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC403 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Learn_Cast

نبرد در ریشه‌ها وقتی صحبت از تقابل لودویگ فون میزس و کارل مارکس می‌شود، بیشتر افراد بلافاصله به یاد اقتصاد می‌افتند: بازار آزاد در برابر اقتصاد دستوری، یا ناتوانی سوسیالیسم در حل مسئله محاسبه اقتصادی که بنگاه‌های دولتی را عملاً به جزایری از هرج‌ومرج محاسباتی تبدیل می‌کند. اما نقد میزس بسیار عمیق‌تر از مباحث صرفاً اقتصادی است. او با تیشه به ریشه‌های فلسفی مارکسیسم زد و در این مسیر، بدیلی بی‌نظیر و منسجم برای علم جام…

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

25 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC819 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

⁉️ چرا نازیسم، سوسیالیسم بود و چرا سوسیالیسم تمامیت‌خواه است؟ 🎙 سخنرانی #جرج_رایشمن ارائه شده در موسسه لودویگ فون میزس - ۲۰۰۵

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

24 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC857 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

مالکیت یعنی کنترل نهایی بر یک منبع. بنابراین "اقتصاد برنامه‌ریزی شده" که در ظاهر مالکان خصوصی را حفظ می‌کند اما کنترل واقعی را به دولت می‌دهد [مانند فاشیسم و نازیسم]، همانقدر سوسیالیسم است که کمونیسم رسمی. برخی از اطلاق عنوان «سوسیالیسم» به نازیسم یا فاشیسم ابا دارند، زیرا این اصطلاح را منحصر به مارکسیسم یا سوسیال دمکراسی می‌دانند. اما تحلیل اقتصادی کاری با رنگِ لباس، شعارها یا نحوه به قدرت رسیدن حکمرانان ندارد. برا…

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

23 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC957 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

دین همچون ویروس ذهن؛ چکیده‌ استدلال‌های #ریچارد_داوکینز پیرامونِ ایمان، علم و طراحی هوشمند. مقدمه: جغرافیایِ تصادفی 00:00 برچسب‌زنی به کودکان: 02:16 آناتومیِ ویروس: 06:04 توهمِ طراحی: 11:28 خدای حفره‌ها: 15:11 صلحِ بزدلانه: 17:23 ریشه‌ی اخلاق: 19:08 اصل انسان‌نگر: 23:17 خدایی که خیلی کوچک است: 26:12 تنها گونه‌ بیدار: 28:26 شعرِ واقعیت: 30:42 #اندیشه_آزاد

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

23 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

باور, صدق و منابع شناخت بخشی از کتاب درآمدی بر تحلیل فلسفی #جان‌_هاسپرس An Introduction To Philosophical Analysis John Hospers ‌ منابع شناخت در معرفت‌شناسی ​اعتبارسنجی و توجیه (Justification): تفکیک «دانش معتبر» از حدس، گمان و خرافات. ​تعیین روش‌شناسی (Methodology): مشخص کردن ابزار مناسب برای هر علم (مثلاً استفاده از حس برای فیزیک و عقل برای ریاضیات). ​جلوگیری از خطای «جابجایی روش»: ممانعت از بکارگیری ابزار اشتباه …

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

22 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC939 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

لیبرالیسم معاصر فلسفه آزادی و برابری

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

22 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC937 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

با کنار هم گذاشتن این دو آیه چه برداشتی از متن دارید؟ چرا خدایی که خودش عقیم و بدون نسل و تبار است این مسئله که مخالفان محمد به او ابتر می‌گفتند باید به این صورت ناراحت و خشمگینش کنه و خیلی انسان‌وار و با بیان و بروز احساساتی انسانی همون طعنه و‌ کنایه رو به خود مخالفان بگه و برگردونه؟ خودتی خودتی ابتر خودتی. این کلام خداست؟ وقتی میشه روی همین متن با ادعای وحی الهی بودن کار کرد و "موجه بودن" و "صادق بودن" گزاره‌هاشو …

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

22 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

ذوالقرنـین کیست؟ ردپای یک اشتباه تاریخی در قرآن!

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

21 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC979 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

¹ ویدیوی اول: دستگاه فکری جان استوارت میل [در جستجوی آزادی] ² ویدیوی دوم: آدام اسمیت، فراتر از دست نامرئی [دستگاه فکری آدام اسمیت]

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

21 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

چرا گرایش‌ها و ایده‌های مارکسیستی، فقر را به دنبال خود آورده است؟ رایج‌ترین پاسخ این است که لنین، استالین، کاسترو یا چاوز هیچ‌کدام، هیچ‌وقت «مارکسیسم واقعی» را اجرا نکرده‌اند و هر کدام به نحوی مارکسیسم را اشتباه اجرا کرده‌اند. این ویدئو سعی دارد به نادرستی این ادعا پاسخ دهد. #اندیشه_آزاد

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

20 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

«به اصطلاح لیبرال‌های [چپِ] امروزی باور دارند که بدونِ آزادی اقتصادی می‌توان آزادی بیان، آزادی اندیشه، آزادی مطبوعات، آزادی مذهبی، و آزادی زندانی نشدنِ بدونِ محاکمه را حفظ کرد. چنین کسانی نمی‌فهمند در نظامی که بازار ندارد و همه‌چیز در اختیار دولت است همه‌ی آزادی‌های دیگر توهم است؛ حتی اگر چنین آزادی‌هائی به‌صورت قانون درآیند و مکتوب شوند و در قوانینِ اساسی گنجانده شوند» • فون میزس

Signed EmadiSatioN+13

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @azadandishan0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

My Whole Universe...
@sarinaez · 29,772
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
ܭߊ‌‌ܦ߭ܘ ܭࡅߺ߳ߊ‌‌ࡅߺ߲ࡉ
@sacafeketab · 28,631
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اندیشه آزاد 💡” (@azadandishan0), 10,493 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azadandishan0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.