Channel
@azalazhary
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,613subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001393964519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @azalazhary |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/azalazhary |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Alehussini/182327 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC | @azalazhary/6144 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @Alehussini/182828 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC | @azalazhary/6149 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Alehussini/182928 Jul 2026, 23:50 UTC | @azalazhary/6150 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 23:50 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Alehussini/183129 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC | @azalazhary/6152 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Alehussini/183430 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC | @azalazhary/6155 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Alehussini | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @Alehussini (12–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Alehussini. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 1,613 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 1,617 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 1,619 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:14 | 1,621 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 1,623 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 1,624 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 1,617 | +16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 1,601 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 1,600 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 1,604 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 1,603 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
لم يمنعه طولُ العمر من التثبت، ولا صرفه علوُّ المنزلة عن الرجوع إلى الكتب، ولا شغله اللقبُ عن ملازمة التحقيق والمراجعة؛ وتلك شيمةُ الراسخين في العلم. حفظ الله سيدي العلامة عبد العزيز الشهاوي، وأدام نفعنا بعلومه، وبارك في عمره وعمله!
لماذا لم يعد لمثل هذه الكتب نظائر في عصرنا؟ أهو لقلة الوفاء؟! أم لضعف القدرة على الصياغة؟! أم لانعدام الرواد الذين كانوا يملؤون الساحة علمًا وأدبًا؟! لا مرية في أن كثيرًا ممن عرفناهم من أساتذتنا يستحقون أن تُكتب عنهم كتبٌ كهذه، ولو أن كلَّ طالبٍ أظهر شيئًا مما وعاه عن أستاذه، وسجَّل طرفًا من شمائله، ودوَّن شيئًا من مواقفه وآثاره، لاجتمع من ذلك تراثٌ نفيس، ولحُفظت سيرُ رجالٍ كان لهم في العلم والتربية والفكر والأدب آث…
هو مما قرأتُه كثيرًا، وفيه مقالاتٌ نفيسة، وصاحبُه ذو قلمٍ رصين وأسلوبٍ ناصع.
شيءٌ يُحيِّر العقول: تلك الإجازات التي تظهر فجأةً عند بعض الأساتذة، وتلك المسموعات التي تستجدُّ يومًا بعد يوم، حتى غدا كلُّ يومٍ يحمل إلينا جديدًا لم يعرفه المعتنون بالرواية منذ زمن. مع أن الأستاذ هو الأستاذ، والشيخ هو الشيخ، لكن المرويات تتكاثر، والمسموعات تتوالد. اسمحوا لي، فإني أعجز عن إدراك مصدر هذا التجدد المتواصل في عالم الإجازات!
وكانت تُطبع كتبُ أهلِ العربية في البلاد البعيدة يوم كان لأهلِ المهجر تعلُّقٌ صادقٌ باللغة، وإقبالٌ على علومها، واعتزازٌ بتراثها.
نشأ جيلٌ من الطلبة لا يعرف من العلم إلا حضورَ مجالس السماع والرواية، يعدُّونها أساسَ العلم، ولا يدركون أن الأصل هو الدراية، وأن الإجازة في زماننا من مُلَحِ العلم، وليست من أصوله. ومشكلة هذا الجيل تشبه حال من أدمنوا مشاهدة المقاطع القصيرة (الريلز)؛ فقد نشأ كثيرٌ منهم عليها حتى لم يعودوا يطيقون متابعة مادة علمية كاملة، ولا حتى مقطعًا يمتد بضع دقائق، وإنما يريدون كل شيء مختصرًا سريعًا. وقد قرأت قبل مدة دراسةً طبيةً تُظ…
أتمنى لعمي الحاج "محمد إمبابي" -صاحب المكتبة الأزهرية للتراث- عافية ممتدة، وأيامًا هانئة في عزلته التي اقتضاها كبر سنه، يعيشها في راحة وطمأنينة، تحيطه بركة العلم الذي أحبه، ودعوات من انتفعوا بجهوده. وأشهد أنه أدى دوره كما يجب، وأعطى أكثر مما أخذ، وترك أثرًا لا يُمحى في قلوب من عرفوه. وحتى يجمعنا لقاء، فسلامٌ عليكَ حيث كنت، وسلامٌ عليك حين أعنت، وسلامٌ عليك حين أكرمت.
كثيرون منا يعيشون بأوهامٍ تصنع لهم مكانةً متخيَّلة؛ فهذا يظن أن الألقاب العلمية تمنحه رفعةً لا تُنال إلا بالرسوخ، وذاك يحسب أن كثرة ما قرأ من الكتب أو سرده على المشايخ تجعله من أهل العلم، وآخر يفاخر بكثرة الإجازات وتعدد المسموعات، وما هي إلا أوهامٌ تستر خواء المعنى بزخرفة المظهر.
كم هي مخيفةٌ الأيام! تمضي في صمت وهدوء، لكنها لا تترك شيئًا على حاله؛ فهي تُغيِّر ملامحنا، وتنتزع كثيرًا من عاداتنا، وتأخذ من عافيتنا عامًا بعد عام. ما أشد حزني حين ألقى صديقًا لم أره منذ زمن، فإذا الزمن قد رسم على وجهه ما لم أكن أتوقع، فأرى فيه شاهدًا جديدًا على سرعة انقضاء العمر. وما هذه الأيام في حقيقتها إلا خطواتٌ تُقرِّبنا من دارنا الباقية، فلا ينبغي أن ننشغل عنها بما يفنى، ولا أن نغفل عما يبقى. اللهم اجعل لن…
يعجبني قلم صافي ناز كاظم، وأحرص على قراءة ما تكتب.
جديد ننتظره!
لا تُكثروا الحديث عن هذا المأفون؛ فليس هو القضية، ولا الوقوف عنده مما يليق بمقام الإمام السيوطي. وإنما ينبغي أن ينصرف الحديث كلُّه إلى الطريق الذي أوصلنا إلى أن يتجرأ أمثال هؤلاء على الأعلام، وأن تُبحث الأسباب التي هيأت البيئة لهذا الفكر المتطرف والنَّفَس التكفيري؛ فمعالجة الجذور أولى من الانشغال بالفروع، والنظر في العلل أنفع من الوقوف طويلًا عند الأعراض.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @azalazhary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“د. علي زين العابدين الحسيني” (@azalazhary), 1,613 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azalazhary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.