https://t.me/wuhanqibin

Channel
佳佳的后花园(洪山)
@azdjsjjd90
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
922subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004396035336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @azdjsjjd90 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 14 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/azdjsjjd90 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 922 | +22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 900 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:52 | 912 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 910 | +11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 899 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 887 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 884 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 76.9% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
例假来了,开课会提前通知
今天休息啦宝宝们
😘1
开课了,这么大的地方哥哥要来陪我吗...
下班下班,我的眼睫毛长吗
❤1
今天的不是很热
❤1
开课了,约起来
今天满,可以约明天的了
---💋基础信息💋--- 时间:2026-07-20 老师:佳佳 飞机:@jiajiaxinhao 留名:LiBing ---❤️综合评分❤️--- 颜值:9.2 态度:9.5 环境:9.5 综合:9.4 ---👅细节描述👅--- 人照:人照与群图七八分像吧! 身材:微胖,大胸大屁股,一线天。 服务: 一见面,刚开始还有点腼腆,她坐床上,我坐沙发上,后面聊开后,我就坐到她旁边,看着她闪躲的眼神,这激发了我的占有欲。支付完现金后,各自脱完衣服,就洗起来鸳鸯浴,期间我被她的身材吸引了,她是一个微胖的女生,有着不属于其年龄段的奶子(D罩杯),我喜欢奶子大的,这一下子弟弟就硬挺起来,充血后红红的,她还调戏我说“你下面怎么红红的”,我调情的说“爱❤不就是红红的吗,小老弟爱上你了”,她更腼腆了,我很享受沐浴过程。她帮我洗了全身,按摩了我的弟弟,我也帮她擦拭了身体,给我喜爱的大奶子清洗了一遍,一只手真抓不下,也很柔软,于是忍不住舔了一下,…
❤2
还有空位
我回来了,开课开课
休息几天,开课会频道通知
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @azdjsjjd90. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“佳佳的后花园(洪山)” (@azdjsjjd90), 922 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azdjsjjd90.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.