Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نورُ القلوبِ

Channel

نورُ القلوبِ

@azkar22

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,561subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001331461576
TypeChannel
Username@azkar22
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/azkar22

Growth

2,5612,5832,5726 August 2026 — 2,582 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,583 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,579 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,578 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,573 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,569 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,565 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,563 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,561 subscribers6 August 202631 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 25 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,558–2,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 06:132,561-2
28 Aug 2026, 15:182,563-2
22 Aug 2026, 18:192,565-4
19 Aug 2026, 13:432,569-4
16 Aug 2026, 20:282,573-5
12 Aug 2026, 23:582,578-1
9 Aug 2026, 16:012,579-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:402,583+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:182,582first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4795.9%
👍12.04%
👎12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

الدرر السنية - تطبيق التفسير المحرر "هُوَ الَّذِي أَنْزَلَ عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ مُحْكَمَاتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ الْكِتَابِ وَأُخَرُ مُتَشَابِهَاتٌ فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ الْفِتْنَةِ وَابْتِغَاءَ تَأْوِيلِهِ وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ إِلَّا اللَّهُ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِهِ كُلٌّ مِنْ عِنْدِ رَبِّنَا وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إ

2

11 Jul 2026, 19:19 UTC131 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

السَلآْم عَلْيُكّمٌ وٍرٍحَمُةّ الله وٍبُرٍكآتُهْ تفسير سورة التكاثر

3

10 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC114 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

2

16 Jun 2026, 15:30 UTC209 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

السَلآْم عَلْيُكّمٌ وٍرٍحَمُةّ الله وٍبُرٍكآتُهْ ما هي كفارة اليمين بالتفصيل ؟

4

5 Jun 2026, 03:38 UTC254 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ستحَبُّ الإكثارُ من الدُّعاءِ يومَ الجُمُعةِ. الأدلَّة: أولًا: من السُّنَّة عن أبي هُرَيرَة رَضِيَ اللهُ عنه، أنَّ رسولَ الله صلَّى اللهُ عليه وسلَّم: ((ذَكَرَ يومَ الجُمُعةِ فقال: فيه ساعةٌ لا يُوافِقُها عبدٌ مسلمٌ وهو قائمٌ يُصلِّي يسألُ اللهَ شيئًا إلَّا أعطاه إيَّاه، وأشار بيدِه يُقلِّلها )) رواه البخاري (935)، ومسلم (852). ثانيًا: مِنَ الِإِجْماع نقَل الإجماعَ على ذلك: النوويُّ قال النوويُّ: (يُستحبُّ إكثار

4👎1

4 Jun 2026, 06:37 UTC222 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شراء وبيع شيء مجهول الجواب: شراء هذا الصندوق لا يجوز؛

2

1 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC226 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من الضعيف المشهور في الأذكار والأدعية (12) الدُّعاءُ المَعروفُ بَينَ النَّاسِ: «البَسْ جَديدًا، وعِشْ حَميدًا، ومُتْ شَهيدًا» يُرَدِّدُه كَثيرونَ عِندَ لُبسِ ثَوبٍ جَديدٍ، إلَّا أَنَّ هذا الدُّعاءَ وَرَدَ عَنِ النَّبيِّ صلَّى اللهُ عليه وسلَّمَ بِإِسنادٍ ضَعيفٍ لا يَصحُّ.

1

28 May 2026, 14:00 UTC216 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dorarnet_telegramPhoto

🎯 أسماء الفائزين في مسابقة الدرر لشهر ذي الحجة 1447 https://dorar.net/contest/winners 👈🏼 (18623) مشاركا 🎖️ (20) فائزا 🌍 (105) دولة ✔️ الفوز الحقيقي في المسابقة هو تَعلُّم العِلم الشرعي والتَّفَقُّه في الدِّين ▪️ المسابقة بالشراكة بين مؤسسة الدرر السنية وأوقاف الشيخ محمد الراجحي ⏳ انتظرونا في مسابقة شهر المحرم إن شاء الله

3

27 May 2026, 18:22 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

رَبَّنَا لا تُؤَاخِذْنَا إِنْ نَسِينَا أَوْ أَخْطَأْنَا رَبَّنَا وَلا تَحْمِلْ عَلَيْنَا إِصْراً كَمَا حَمَلْتَهُ عَلَى الَّذِينَ مِنْ قَبْلِنَا رَبَّنَا وَلا تُحَمِّلْنَا مَا لا طَاقَةَ لَنَا بِهِ وَاعْفُ عَنَّا وَاغْفِرْ لَنَا وَارْحَمْنَا أَنْتَ مَوْلانَا فَانْصُرْنَا عَلَى الْقَوْمِ الْكَافِرِينَ

2

25 May 2026, 21:28 UTC194 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

غدا الثلاثاء صيـام يوم عرفة.. كفارة ذنوب سنتين.! • ذكـــــــــرْ فكم ممن سيصوم بسببك..!

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @azkar22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 233,349 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نورُ القلوبِ” (@azkar22), 2,561 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azkar22.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.