Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1,191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,247–5,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 13:02
5,620
-16
11 Sept 2026, 22:35
5,636
-7
7 Sept 2026, 03:36
5,643
+58
2 Sept 2026, 08:43
5,585
+405
30 Aug 2026, 09:37
5,180
+417
27 Aug 2026, 06:52
4,763
+31
24 Aug 2026, 15:45
4,732
+32
20 Aug 2026, 20:04
4,700
+23
18 Aug 2026, 03:02
4,677
+245
15 Aug 2026, 01:28
4,432
+3
14 Aug 2026, 17:30
4,429
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
447 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
205
45.9%
❤🔥
59
13.2%
🔥
52
11.6%
😭
29
6.49%
💘
28
6.26%
custom 5404390076207629359
23
5.15%
🤯
19
4.25%
😱
12
2.68%
🥰
11
2.46%
😍
5
1.12%
⚡
3
0.671%
👍
1
0.224%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📸 «Улыбнитесь! Вас снимает скрытая камера» или почему стало так модно фотографировать всё?
Сегодня это язык самовыражения: через кадр мы показываем своё настроение, эстетику и то, каким видим окружающий мир. И вот парадокс: чем идеальнее становятся камеры, тем сильнее нас привлекают зерно, вспышка, смаз и эстетика старых цифровых фото. Почему? Смотри в карточках!
📸 А какой стиль ближе вам — идеальные «эстетичные» к…
📽Одна из самых интригующих загадок Главного здания — старинный подземный ход, расположенный в северной части бывшего дворцового комплекса.
Кирпичный тоннель высотой около 1,7 м и шириной 0,5 м частично сохранился на глубине примерно 4 м под фундаментом. Его современное состояние зажато между советскими инженерными решениями: с одной стороны ход разрушен при строительстве бомбоубежища, с другой — забетонирован. Каких…
🏛️ Легенды Бауманки живут не только в рассказах старшекурсников, но и в стенах нашего Университета.
Как думаете, что скрывает этот кадр и в каком именно месте вуза он был сделан? Пишите варианты в комментариях, а правильный ответ раскроем уже через пару часов! ⏳
⚔️ Кто они на самом деле: три исторических персонажа, три возраста души или три грани одного народа?
#нарисовали
«Богатыри» — так Виктор Васнецов назвал своё главное полотно, завершённое в 1898 году, хотя первый набросок появился ещё в 1871-м. Идея родилась у художника в Париже, где он, изучая европейское искусство, вдруг остро почувствовал тоску по родине. Васнецов вернулся в Россию и посвятил картине 27 лет жизни:…
Узнали?
Разумеется, это Красная Площадь
— место, которое хранит в себе не только историю Университета, но и миллионы шагов студентов. Здесь назначаются встречи и начинается кафедра питания, а если пройти дальше, то можно попасть в Дом физики и зарядиться знаниями!
Ставь «❤️», если узнаешь это место из тысячи!
🏛 История нашего Университета поистине богата и уникальна.
В фотоальбоме Бауманки можно найти множество кадров, сделанных в разные периоды истории — от императорских времен до современности.
Попробуйте угадать, в каком месте было сделано это фото. Ответ выложим совсем скоро!
🍑 Когда мы в последний раз ловили себя на мысли, что счастливы прямо сейчас, без всякой причины?
#нарисовали
Валентин Серов написал картину «Девочка с персиками» в 1887 году. На ней изображена двенадцатилетняя Вера Мамонтова в усадьбе Абрамцево. За окном солнечное лето, в руках персик, на столе нож и кленовые листья. Вся сцена дышит светом, теплом и беззаботностью. Сейчас, когда за окном тоже лето, так и хочется оку…
❤13💘8❤🔥7⚡2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @b2b_bmstu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Просто доверься своей интуиции и выбери, какие тучи надо разогнать, чтобы вернуть солнечные дни ☀️
🌟🌟19%
🌟🌟22%
🌟🌟21%
🌟🌟13%
🌟🌟25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Приёмная комиссия МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана @pk_bmstu · 23,991 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана @bmstu1830 · 29,216 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“B2B: Бауманцы для Бауманцев” (@b2b_bmstu), 5,620 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b2b_bmstu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
