В течении дня искал мем, чтобы показать, что у меня не такой уж и серьезный канал. Сам поржал, но мем не смог выбрать(((
😁9👻3👏2🥰1

Channel
@baaadmanager
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
236subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001517170728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baaadmanager |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baaadmanager |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 236 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 235 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:28 | 237 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 238 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 239 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 236 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 236 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
143 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 21.0% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 20.3% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 17.5% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 16.1% | |
| 🤓 | 7 | 4.90% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 4.20% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 2.80% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.10% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.10% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.699% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @baaadmanager. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В течении дня искал мем, чтобы показать, что у меня не такой уж и серьезный канал. Сам поржал, но мем не смог выбрать(((
😁9👻3👏2🥰1
Закрытый бета-тест. Сегодня есть возможность помочь проекту и получить пользу для себя. Только не надо проходить тест, если он вам не нужен)) Почитайте сначала, для кого он, и решите точно, нужен ли он вам: Тык https://growpath.ru/unblockedmanager-landing А потом вступайте в группу: https://growpath.ru/invite?token=5a76c573f81c0dc18dc41346b1952713 (там есть лимит). Тогда вам откроется возможность пройти тест и пол…
🔥2✍1
Posted without readable text
😁3
Пока готовится релиз новой фичи, поделюсь наблюдением о том, как лично на меня влияет работа с ИИ. Она даёт такое ощущение безграничной продуктивности, что в моменты, когда агенты шуршат, а тебе нечего делать, руки (конечно, не руки, а голова) — так и тянутся куда-то ещё. Срочно нужно что-нибудь сделать… чтобы не утратить этот флёр безграничной продуктивности. Прямо бью себя в такие моменты по рукам (а надо не по р…
💯3😁3😱1
Ванильного неба и балтийских закатов в ленту.
❤6
Как и почему появился проект https://growpath.ru/ Тест DISC даёт очень много информации о тебе самом: как ты взаимодействуешь с другими людьми, принимаешь решения и какой у тебя стиль работы. Но все тесты, которые я находил в тырнете выдают очень мало информации, потому что сам DISC достаточно специфично трактуется. Чтобы нормально разобраться в результате, нужен определённый опыт (и обучение и даже сертификация). …
🔥6⚡3👍3
Posted without readable text
❤4💯2
Posted without readable text
🔥7❤4
В отпуск с gpt В этом году отпуск планировался с чатом GPT. Точно была понятна страна, в которую хочется поехать — Таиланд. А вот дальше — много хотелок. Мот, серпантины, белые песчаные пляжи, музеи и т. д. Получилось очень хорошо. Наверное, профессиональный гид справился бы не хуже, но уже сам процесс планирования и «обсуждения» доставил отдельное удовольствие. Он посоветовал поехать на север, где есть дорога — к…
👍3🔥3❤2
Я не люблю наличные. Ещё в далёком 2004 году, когда я сделал свою первую карточку (в Сбере). Тут, кстати, отдельная история. При заполнении заявления я указал почту через точку: «v.k*******@gmail.com», а Сбер прислал мне уведомление (СМС), что мне создан аккаунт «vk****». Я быстро побежал регистрировать новую почту, и Gmail сообщил, что аккаунт уже занят 🫠. Но, как выяснилось, Gmail позволяет в своём адресе хоть по…
👍4❤2💯1🤯1😁1
Попалось мне тут две картинки про среднее и медианное богатство по странам. И вторая про ППС (потребление на человека) – где Россия аж на 4ом месте. И вот эти все аналитики конечно интересно, но как обычно возник вопрос "Кому на Руси жить хорошо?" Пошли разобраться. Например США со своим средним богатством со 2ой позиции (после Швейцарии, которая на 1ом) откатывается аж до 28го места по медианному. Тк в штатах метри…
👍6🤣1
Вот так делаешь делаешь проект, а потом тебе задают вопрос. - А кто твоя ЦА? - ну моя ЦА, это такие люди которые хотят… (Я же для них делал этот свой проект). А потом я вспомнил, что когда-то давно учился управлять продуктам по метрикам. Это как, наверное, управлять машиной только по приборам – такое себе удовольствие (Кто ездил в туман, тот понимает, о чем речь). Но на самом деле очень полезная история. Проверить ги…
👍5🤓4❤2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @baaadmanager. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записки иного менеджера” (@baaadmanager), 236 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baaadmanager.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.