Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,098–1,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 11:56
1,119
+6
11 Sept 2026, 16:40
1,113
+3
6 Sept 2026, 21:00
1,110
+2
2 Sept 2026, 07:56
1,108
-1
27 Aug 2026, 20:54
1,109
+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:43
1,107
-1
21 Aug 2026, 04:58
1,108
+2
18 Aug 2026, 04:14
1,106
+1
15 Aug 2026, 03:46
1,105
+4
8 Aug 2026, 07:01
1,101
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:04
1,102
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:20
1,102
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
697 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
404
58.0%
👍
143
20.5%
👌
57
8.18%
👏
30
4.30%
💯
29
4.16%
🔥
23
3.30%
🤯
11
1.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2024 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یک سوال لازم!
برای چه چیز ایستاده ای؟
در زندگی خود
اگر چند چیز را لیست کردی
یکی را انتخاب کن.
بعد نگاه کن ببین این انتخاب از کجا آب میخوره؟
و همیشه این سوال را از خودت بپرس
برای چه چیز ایستاده ای؟
در زندگی خود
شاید!
@babakbad
آنچه خراب است، نقد نمیخواهد؛ باید کنار گذاشته شود.
آنچه زنده و سالم است، نقد را میطلبد و رشد میکند.
(غذای فاسد را بررسی نمیکنند، دور میریزند اما غذای سالم قابل نقد و بهتر شدن است)
حالا سؤال اینجاست:
در ذهن و باورهای ما،
کدام اندیشه و رفتار هنوز زندهاند و شایسته نقد؟
و کدامها آنقدر فاسد شدهاند که جرات نقدشان را نداریم؟
خود ما چی؟ نقد پذیریم؟
شاید!
@Babakbad
قدرت، زندگی و رشد در حقیقت است و ناتوانی، افول و از بین رفتن از پنهان کاری می آید.
و در ما کدام بیشتر است؟ خودمان با خودمان و خودمان با دیگران؟
شاید!
@babakbad
معمولا ما در شنیدن دچار بدیهی ات کرخت شده میشویم و نمی شنویم میخوام ازتون دعوت کنم به این موسیقی نه با شنوایی قبلی بلکه بعنوان صدای یک مشاور روانکاو دوباره گوش کنید توجه نکنید خواننده کیست و از او شنوایی دارید از اول و خالی گوش کنید بعد چیزهای جدید میشنوید پس این یک موسیقی پاپ الان نیست یک صدای مشاور است.
معجزه خالی شنیدن!
ِلذت ببرید❤️
شاید!
@babakbad
من نمیدانم ! چرا سالهاست همه دنبال شیر و عقاباند.
اما این مرغابی است که زندگی را زندگی میکند.
چشمها را باید شست... زندگی مرغابی سراسر درس است: تنها موجود زنده ای که پرواز میکند، راه میرود، شنا میکند، زیر آب سر میبرد،
هزار کیلومتر در تیمی هماهنگ مهاجرت میکند، …
همه چیز جهان بر مبنای یک حقیقت واحد است و فقط بشر در طول سالها برای خودش واقعیتهایی را ساخته و از بین برده و ساخته و از بین برده......
شاید!
@babakbad
هر چیزی را برای سنجش واحدی است و میزان معنوی بودن انسان را واحد سنجش< مجموعه وزن رفتارهای فرد > است.
و اینچنین است که عابدی غیر معنوی و رقصنده معنوی یافت میشود.
شاید!
@babakbad
❤14👍7👏2👌1
Signed 🔵 Badkoobeh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @babakbad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کافه کتاب 📚 @roman_bookk · 24,653 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Maybe!شايد” (@babakbad), 1,119 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babakbad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.