Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Œ๐€๐’'๐€ ๐๐€๐‚ ๐Ÿฉต

Channel

๐Œ๐€๐’'๐€ ๐๐€๐‚ ๐Ÿฉต

@bacexam2026

Not marked by Telegram, checked 2 September 2026

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

10,016subscribers

+223 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002193515918
TypeChannel
Username@bacexam2026
Descriptionู‚ู†ุงุฉ ู…ุณุนู‰ุŒ ู…ุณุนุงูƒ ู†ุญูˆ ุงู„ู†ุฌุงุญ ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ู…ุฎุตุตุฉ ู„ุทู„ุจุฉ ุงู„ุจูƒุงู„ูˆุฑูŠุง ุจุตูุฉ ุฎุงุตุฉ ุฅู„ุง ุฃู† ุงู„ุฌู…ูŠุน ุณูŠุชููŠุฏ ู…ู† ู…ุญุชูˆุงู‡ุง ุŒ ู…ู† ุชุญููŠุฒ ูˆู†ุตุงุฆุญ ุฏุฑุงุณูŠุฉ ูˆุชุญุฏูŠุงุช ูˆุชุนุจู„ู… ู…ู‡ุงุฑุงุช ุชูˆุงุตู„ ู…ุน ุตุงุญุจ ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ @youcefbaroudi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bacexam2026

Topic

Education โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,62510,0169,820.528 August 2026 โ€” 9,793 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 9,793 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 9,778 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 9,712 subscribers5 September 2026 โ€” 9,625 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 9,721 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 9,821 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 9,818 subscribers26 September 2026 โ€” 9,829 subscribers5 October 2026 โ€” 9,831 subscribers10 October 2026 โ€” 9,847 subscribers14 October 2026 โ€” 9,909 subscribers17 October 2026 โ€” 9,939 subscribers21 October 2026 โ€” 9,978 subscribers24 October 2026 โ€” 9,948 subscribers27 October 2026 โ€” 9,979 subscribers30 October 2026 โ€” 9,935 subscribers2 November 2026 โ€” 9,994 subscribers5 November 2026 โ€” 10,013 subscribers6 November 2026 โ€” 10,016 subscribers28 August 20266 November 2026
20 measurements spanning 70 days, net +223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 9,566โ€“10,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 22:4010,016+3
5 Nov 2026, 20:3710,013+19
2 Nov 2026, 21:549,994+59
30 Oct 2026, 12:469,935-44
27 Oct 2026, 02:179,979+31
24 Oct 2026, 09:459,948-30
21 Oct 2026, 00:499,978+39
17 Oct 2026, 12:349,939+30
14 Oct 2026, 16:419,909+62
10 Oct 2026, 22:019,847+16
5 Oct 2026, 01:029,831+2
26 Sept 2026, 08:009,829+11
17 Sept 2026, 18:169,818-3
14 Sept 2026, 01:399,821+100
10 Sept 2026, 08:419,721+96
5 Sept 2026, 09:219,625-87
1 Sept 2026, 02:359,712-66
29 Aug 2026, 00:349,778-15
28 Aug 2026, 13:159,793no change
28 Aug 2026, 13:019,793first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
0.781%
avg views รท 10,016 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.3
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held76 (18 July 2026 โ€“ 6 November 2026)
Views total3,835
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 23:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ2,760
Videos
โ‰ˆ134
Links
โ‰ˆ334

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

292 reactions across 61 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค20570.2%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ237.88%
๐Ÿ’˜186.16%
๐Ÿ˜ญ165.48%
โšก134.45%
๐Ÿ“103.42%
๐Ÿ•Š31.03%
๐Ÿ‘Œ10.342%
๐Ÿ‘10.342%
๐Ÿ’”10.342%
๐Ÿ˜10.342%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 3 of 49 posts held from the last 30 days (6.12%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 22:52 UTC4 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ุนุฒูŠุฒูŠ ุงู„ุทุงู„ุจ ๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ูƒู„ ุงู„ู…ุตุงุฏุฑ ุงู„ุฎุงุตุฉ ุจุงู„ุจูƒุงู„ูˆุฑูŠุง ู‡ู†ุง ู„ูƒ โฌ‡๏ธ https://t.me/addlist/C-OCaHn6VEI3MWJk ุงุนู„ู… ุงู†ูƒ ุณุชุตู„ I trust you good night ๐ŸŒ‰ ๐Ÿ’™

Signed ๐๐Ž๐“ | ๐๐„๐—๐”๐’ | ๐ˆ๐Œ๐“๐ˆ๐€๐™ | ๐‹๐Ž๐–

6 Nov 2026, 22:44 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ู…ู„ุงุญุธุฉ : ู‚ุจู„ ู…ุงุชุฑู‚ุฏูˆ ุงุถุฑุจูˆุง ุทู„ุฉ ุนู„ู‰ ุฏุฑุณ ุญุงุจูŠู† ุชุญูุถูˆู‡ุŒ ูˆ ูƒูŠ ุชู†ูˆุถูˆ ุงูˆู„ ุญุงุฌุฉ ุงุญูุถูˆู‡ ๐Ÿ’œ

โค1๐Ÿ’˜1

6 Nov 2026, 22:41 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ุชุตุจุญูˆู† ุนู„ู‰ ู…ุณุงู…ุน ุงุฐุงู† ุงู„ูุฌุฑ ๐Ÿ’œโœจ

โค1๐Ÿ’˜1

6 Nov 2026, 21:54 UTC20 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

ุฌู…ุงุนุฉ ุนู†ุฏูŠ ุงู‚ุชุฑุงุญุŒ ูˆุงุด ุฑุงูŠูƒู… ู†ูุชุญูˆ ุจุซ ุฌู„ุณุงุช ุฏุฑุงุณุฉ ู„ูŠู„ุฉ ุงู„ุทู„ุจุฉ ุงู„ุญุงุจูŠู† ูŠู‚ุฑุงูˆ ู…ุน ู„ูŠู„

  1. ู…ุน78%
  2. ุถุฏ22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

โค3

6 Nov 2026, 21:30 UTC31 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ุงู†ุชู‡ุช ุงู„ุฌู„ุณุฉ ุงู„ุฎุงู…ุณุฉ ูˆุงู„ุงุฎูŠุฑุฉุŒ ุดูƒุฑุง ู„ูƒู…ุŒ ุฑุจูŠ ูŠุซุจุชู„ูƒู… ู…ุง ุญูุถุชู… ูˆ ู…ุงุฏุฑุณุชู… ูˆ ุงุณุงู„ ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุงู† ูŠุณุชูˆุฏุนูƒู… ุงูŠู‡ุง ูˆูŠุฑุฏู‡ุง ุงู„ูŠูƒู… ูˆู‚ุช ุงู„ุญุงุฌุฉ โœจ

โค6

6 Nov 2026, 20:36 UTC54 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ู…ุงุฒู„ุชูˆ ุชู‚ุฑุงูˆ ๐Ÿ‘€ุŸุŸ!

โค5

6 Nov 2026, 20:31 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ู†ุจุฏุงูˆ ุงู„ุฌู„ุณุฉ ุงู„ุฎุงู…ุณุฉ ูˆุงู„ุงุฎูŠุฑุฉ โœจ ู…ู† 9.30ุงู„ู‰ 10.30 ู…ูˆูู‚ูŠู† โœจ๐ŸŒธ

โค4

6 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC66 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ุงู†ุชู‡ุช ุงู„ุฌู„ุณุฉ ุงู„ุฑุงุจุนุฉ โœจ ุจูˆุฑูƒุชู… ูุงุตู„ ูˆู†ูˆุงุตู„ ุงู„ุฌู„ุณุฉ ุงู„ุฎุงู…ุณุฉ ูˆุงู„ุงุฎูŠุฑุฉ ู„ู„ูŠูˆู…ุŒ ูˆู„ูŠ ุญุจ ูŠุฒูŠุฏ ูŠุฌุชู‡ุฏ ุฑุจูŠ ูŠูˆูู‚ูˆ ๐Ÿ™‚โœจ

โค5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

6 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ู†ุจุฏุงูˆ ุงู„ุฌู„ุณุฉ ุงู„ุฑุงุจุนุฉ ุจุชูˆููŠู‚ ู…ู† ุงู„ู„ู‡ โœจ ุงู„ุฌู„ุณุฉ ุชู…ุชุฏ ู…ู† 8:00 ุงู„ู‰ ุบุงูŠุฉ 9:00

โค6

6 Nov 2026, 18:31 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ุงู†ุชู‡ุช ุงู„ุฌู„ุณุฉ ุงู„ุซุงู„ุซุฉ โœจ ูุงุตู„ ูˆู†ูˆุงุตู„

โค2

6 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC82 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

ูƒุงูุญูˆุง ู…ู† ุงุฌู„ ุงู† ูŠูƒูˆู† ุฎุชุงู…ู‡ุง ู…ุณูƒ โœจ

โค4

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @bacexam2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @bacexam2026 as deleted โ€” posts this register held that were missing from the channelโ€™s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโ€™s public page, and when โ€” not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 21:54 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

ุฌู…ุงุนุฉ ุนู†ุฏูŠ ุงู‚ุชุฑุงุญุŒ ูˆุงุด ุฑุงูŠูƒู… ู†ูุชุญูˆ ุจุซ ุฌู„ุณุงุช ุฏุฑุงุณุฉ ู„ูŠู„ุฉ ุงู„ุทู„ุจุฉ ุงู„ุญุงุจูŠู† ูŠู‚ุฑุงูˆ ู…ุน ู„ูŠู„

  1. ู…ุน78%
  2. ุถุฏ22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

ุญุงุจูŠู† ู†ุจุฏุงูˆ ุฌู„ุณุงุช ุฏุฑุงุณุฉ ู„ูŠู„ุฉ ุงู„ูŠูˆู…ุŸ

  1. ู†ุนู…91%
  2. ู„ุง18%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Nov 2026, 09:54 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

ุชุญุจูˆุง ู†ุฏูŠุฑูˆ ุฌู„ุณุงุช ุฏุฑุงุณูŠุฉุŒูˆ ุชุญุฏูŠุงุช ุงุณุจูˆุนูŠุฉ โœจ

  1. ู…ุงู†ุฏูŠุฑูˆุด ๐Ÿ’”0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

ูˆูŠู† ุฑุงูƒู… ู„ุงุญู‚ูŠู† ูุงู„ููŠุฒูŠุงุก โ˜ข๏ธŽ

  1. ููŠ ุชู…ุงุฑูŠู† ุงู„ูˆุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุงูˆู„ู‰ ุงู„ู…ุชุงุจุนุฉ ุงู„ุฒู…ู†ูŠุฉ75%
  2. ุจุฏูŠุช ููŠ ุฏุฑูˆุณ ุงู„ูˆุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุซุงู†ูŠุฉ ู…ูŠูƒุงู†ูŠูƒ42%
  3. ููŠ ุชู…ุงุฑูŠู† ุงู„ูˆุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุซุงู†ูŠุฉ8%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

ูˆูŠู† ุฑุงูƒู… ู„ุงุญู‚ูŠู† ูุงู„ุนู„ูˆู… ุทุจูŠุนูŠุฉ ๐ŸงฌุŸุŸุŸ

  1. ููŠ ุชู…ุงุฑูŠู† ุงู„ูˆุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุซุงู†ูŠุฉ ุงู„ุนู„ุงู‚ุฉ ุจูŠู† ุงู„ูˆุญุฏุฉ ูˆ ุงู„ูˆุธูŠูุฉ33%
  2. ุจุฏูŠุช ุฏุฑูˆุณ ุงู„ูˆุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุซุงู†ูŠุฉ11%
  3. ู…ุงุฒู„ุช ู…ุน ุชู…ุงุฑูŠู† ุงู„ูˆุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุฃูˆู„ู‰ ุงู„ูŠุงุช ุชุฑูƒูŠุจ ุงู„ุจุฑูˆุชูŠู†56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐Œ๐ˆ๐’๐’ ๐’๐„๐‘ณ๐’๐€๐๐ˆ๐‘ณ๐„ ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ’œ
@bacwithselsabilez ยท 34,262
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 10 September 2026
Islemaths
@Islemaths_bac ยท 23,194
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here โ€” alongside 65 others โ€” read 16 September 2026
ุฃุณุชุงุฐ ุงู„ูู„ุณูุฉ ุฃูƒุฑู… ุบุณุงู†
@akramghassanphilo2023 ยท 64,063
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here โ€” alongside 73 others โ€” read 28 August 2026
WIN BAC
@winbac2023 ยท 28,262
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here โ€” alongside 71 others โ€” read 13 September 2026
ุฃุณุชุงุฐุฉ ุงู„ุฃุฏุจ ุงู„ุนุฑุจูŠ
@profnourbac2025 ยท 26,338
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 13 September 2026
Path to Bac 2027
@dr_bacsasa ยท 19,737
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here โ€” alongside 71 others โ€” read 29 September 2026
๐— ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฆ ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ง๐—”๐——๐— โ™” แดฑแดบแดณแดธแดตหขแดด
@Miss_Ritadj ยท 32,317
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 63 here โ€” alongside 62 others โ€” read 5 September 2026
AYA AYA 897 (BAC)
@AYA_AYA_897_bac ยท 21,155
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here โ€” alongside 72 others โ€” read 20 September 2026
๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—จ๐——๐—ฌ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฅ๐—— ๐ŸŽง
@studyhard_dz ยท 25,470
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 69 here โ€” alongside 68 others โ€” read 19 September 2026
Bac 2027
@bac2021youcan ยท 37,825
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 70 here โ€” alongside 69 others โ€” read 2 September 2026
๐‘ฉ๐‘จ๐‘ช ๐‘ฐ๐‘บ ๐‘ฌ๐‘จ๐‘บ๐’€ ๐Ÿง 
@Is_easyy ยท 31,395
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here โ€” alongside 79 others โ€” read 9 September 2026
๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ
@rraaaayhh ยท 27,679
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here โ€” alongside 78 others โ€” read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Œ๐€๐’'๐€ ๐๐€๐‚ ๐Ÿฉตโ€ (@bacexam2026), 10,016 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bacexam2026.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.