سوال جالب یک اکانت از یک طلبه: فقط تضعیف صدا و سیما خطرناک است؟ چرا شما همه را تضعیف کرده و میکنید جز صدا و سیما؟ وقتی لباس پیغمبر به تن کنید حرفی بزنید در صورتی که رویه ی شما چیزی دیگر باشد باید حق بدهید عموم تصور کنند شما از دین برای سوء استفاده به جهت محقق کردن منافع خود پیروی میکنید خلاصه ی کلام: اینان که لباس پیغمبر پوشیده و در توئیتر فارسی خودشان "نه مدافع دین و انقلاب" که پادوی رسانه ای این جریان و آن گروه ش…

Channel
بچه های بالا
@bachehay_bala
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,556subscribers
+2,971 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002205619910 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bachehay_bala |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bachehay_bala |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 17,556 | +312 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 17,244 | +2,939 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 14,305 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 14,316 | -15 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 14,331 | -22 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 14,353 | -21 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 14,374 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:48 | 14,389 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 14,401 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 14,407 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 14,417 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 14,427 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 14,439 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 14,452 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 14,461 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 14,459 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 14,464 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 14,474 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 14,492 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 14,498 | first reading |
Engagement
267 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.64%
- avg views ÷ 17,556 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,170
- 97 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 97
- of 267 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 267 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 113,062 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 30m 31s
- Average length
- 1m 23s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
چرا به جای اعتراض به دولت، از برخی جریانات منفور در جبهه انقلاب گلایه میکنیم؟ ویدئو را ببینید مشکل براندازها جمهوری اسلامی نیست. مشکل براندازها جریان منفور پهلوی است که آنها را به جان هم انداخته کوه یخ جبهه انقلاب 24 میلیون رای داشت (مجموع آرا کل کاندیداهای جبهه انقلاب در سال 1400) بروید ببینید عملکرد کدام جریان تکفیری (با هواداران نونهالِ بی اطلاع و بی اخلاق) بود که جبهه انقلاب را چنان درگیر بدبینی به تک تک اعضایش…
حجت الاسلام سید محمد حسین میرلوحی: همانها که مقدار نفرتشان از #قالیباف چندین برابر #ترامپ است، خبر جعل کردند که #چین گفته است با قالیباف که مسئول پرونده چین است کار نمیکنیم! به یـــــزدان که گـــــر ما خـــرد داشتیم @bachehay_bala
نظر سنجی ادعایی درباره ی محبوبیت تلویزیون بین مردم از دیروز 4 صفحه اسکرین ادعایی از یک نظرسنجی به طور وسیع در کانالهای ایتایی و مجازی پخش شده که بر اساس آن مدعیان تاکید دارند: مردم ایران نسبت به رئیس جممهور که گفته تلویزیون نگاه نمیکنم واکنش منفی داشته و برعکس حامی تلویزیون هستند. در اینکه انتشار آن فیلم از آقای پزشکیان به دو قطبی کمک میکند و قطعا غلط است بحثی نیست. اما سوال اینجاست: این نظرسنجیها از کجا در می آ…
این پست 4 روز بعد از تذکر و تاکید رهبری منتشر شده است آیا لازم است بگوییم این اکانت ها، اکانت های معروف و شناسنامه دار و با هویت هواداری چه کسی هستند؟ آیا اگر بپرسیم چرا نسبت به ترور شخصیت همه (جز خودش) از رئیسی شهید تا انقلابیون فعلی ساکت است سوال بدی پرسیده ایم؟ به یـــــزدان که گـــــر ما خـــرد داشتیم @bachehay_bala
توئیت سمت راست از "حمید رسایی از تهران" 4 روز بعد از پیام پر تاکید رهبری ارسال شده است تصویر سمت چپ هم مربوط به حمله آمریکا به سفارت ایران در زمان شهید رئیسی است. در آن زمان هم آیا شهید مظلوم برای دشمن کارت فرستاده بود؟ قطعا نه ما در میانه ی یک جنگ تمام عیار و حیثیتی هستیم. بیایید به مرام بهشتی و مطهری و خامنه ای شهید و رهبر فعلی با این جنگ رو به رو شویم. به یـــــزدان که گـــــر ما خـــرد داشتیم @bachehay_bala
فقط هزار لایک و بیش از دو هزار کامنت برای توئیت اکانت تلویزیون ایران بعد از آنکه اکانت صدا و سیما جمله ی اقای جبلی با عنوان "تماشای تلویزیون افتخار است" را منتشر کرد، این توئیت با بیش از دو هزار کامنت همراه شد..... خودتان بروید کامنت ها را ببینید....... راستی ! نظر شما درباره تلویزیون ایران چیست؟ برای ما بفرستید تا در کانال بچه های پایین (کانال صدای مخاطب ما) منتشر شود به یـــــزدان که گـــــر ما خـــرد داشتیم …
در مسلخ عشق جز نکو را نکشند روبه صفتان زشت خو را نکشند گر عاشق صادقی ز کشتن مگریز مردار بود هر آنکه او را نکشند @bachehay_bala
ملّت عزیز ایران و جبههی مقاومت، درسهای فراموشنشدنی برای دشمن امریکایی دارد. ۲۶/تیر/۱۴۰۵ @bachehay_bala
علی دانشمند: امسال بصورت ویژه و گسترده تر از سالهای قبل، تصاویر از #جلسات_خلاف_وحدت در فضای مجازی در حال انتشار است؛ دشمن، همهی سربازانش را برای ایجاد آشوب در کشور فراخوانده این حجم از انتشار تصاویر جلسات ِ خلاف وحدت حتما نیازمند بررسی جدی ِ امنیتی ست. به یـــــزدان که گـــــر ما خـــرد داشتیم @bachehay_bala
احسان محمد حسنی، مدیر سابق سازمان اوج: همین هسته باعث ریزش های زیاد در طول این سالها شده هسته ی فعال پر صدا پر هیاهو اینها یک دوره پونز در سر زنان کردند و رفتند یک دوره هم با گشت ارشاد و مسائل 1401 که با آب زمزم هم نمیتوان آن را پاک کرد مجری: برخی میگویند آرزو این است که حجاب به پوشش مهسا امینی برگردد محمد حسنی: چه کسی کار را به اینجا رساند؟ به یـــــزدان که گـــــر ما خـــرد داشتیم @bachehay_bala
حجت الاسلام حسین ابراهیمی: امیدواریم یه شخص فراجلیلی با قابليت جمع کردن تمام طیف های انقلابی، سکان صدا و سیما را در دست بگیرد. پ ن: دستور رهبری هرچه که باشد از آن استقبال میکنیم ولی واقعیت ماجرا این است: حزب اللهی یعنی: جوان متخصص و مومن یعنی تهرانی مقدم موشک ساز و حاجیزاده ی شاهد ساز اما اما اما خشم ا از این است که "حضرات" با ناکارآمدی وحشتناک و شعار زده، تعریف انقلابی را در ذهن عموم به بازی گرفته اند....... خد…
Showing the 12 most recent of 267 posts we hold for @bachehay_bala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bachehay_bala edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 29 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mrtahlilgar · 91,296
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
@time_zaman · 23,374
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
@Ostad_aali · 31,331
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بچه های بالا” (@bachehay_bala), 17,556 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bachehay_bala.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.