Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +1,690. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,899–8,096 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 07:59
7,842
+202
12 Sept 2026, 08:21
7,640
+248
7 Sept 2026, 22:01
7,392
+319
2 Sept 2026, 23:57
7,073
+447
30 Aug 2026, 15:35
6,626
+395
28 Aug 2026, 01:23
6,231
+37
25 Aug 2026, 05:33
6,194
+12
22 Aug 2026, 13:05
6,182
+30
19 Aug 2026, 05:54
6,152
-16
16 Aug 2026, 05:34
6,168
+5
12 Aug 2026, 12:43
6,163
+6
9 Aug 2026, 12:42
6,157
+5
9 Aug 2026, 00:15
6,152
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
133 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
113
85.0%
👍
6
4.51%
🥰
4
3.01%
🍓
3
2.26%
🔥
3
2.26%
👏
2
1.50%
😍
2
1.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧪📘 موضوع مقترح مع الحل
من شفرة الـADN يُبنى البروتين 🧬
ومن إنزيمات دقيقة تُسخَّر في الصناعة ⚙️
وفي مواجهة السرطان المقاوم 🎗
تبدأ المناعة بالهجوم الذكي 🛡
📩 شاركها مع أصدقائك لمزيد من الفائدة والنشر 👍
للتحميل pdf:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/xurxz4yhg5saetf/موضوع+مقترح.pdf/file Voir moins
🚨 تلاميذ النهائي… بينما الجميع منشغل بـ BEM
📌 الوحدات الأخيرة هي مفتاح حسم نقاط الباك!
🧪 التخمر:
تحويل الغلوكوز لإنتاج الطاقة في غياب الأكسجين
وحدة قصيرة… لكنها مليئة بأفكار التمارين والمنهجية ⚠️
🔥 شاركوا المنشور ليصلكم المزيد من مواضيع وملخصات المراجعة النهائية يوميًا.
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @bacmy084. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أيوب للعلوم بكالوريا 2027 🧬 @ayoub_science_bac · 46,094 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
prof_abdou_physique Bac 2026 🥇الأستاذ عبدو رضوان @prof_abdou · 35,937 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
الأستاذ زيد للفيزياء @Zid_Physics · 27,732 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
الأستاذ لعجال شاهر - علوم فيزيائية @Prof_LaadjalChaher · 30,647 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
أسطورة الباك DZ 🇩🇿🎓 @bac_bac_dz · 27,281 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 September 2026
𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗕𝗮𝗰 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟳 @rraaaayhh · 25,327 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 September 2026
Bac 2027 Sciences @Bac2027science · 69,081 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
الأستاذ عبد الله @prof_abdellah_physics · 27,954 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
عقبة بن نافع - الامتياز في البكالوريا - مسار علمي📘 @nafi3_bac_dz_1954 · 195,810 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
أستاذة الأدب العربي @profnourbac2025 · 26,255 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
قناة الأستاذ عبد الباسط @bassetprof · 77,073 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Cours DZ Bac2026/2027 بكالوريا _) (_عقبة بن نافع _الاستاذ نور الدين ) 🩺💉❤🎓 @bacavec20 · 40,897 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
الأستاذة كتفي شريف زينة🦋بكالوريا @profketficherif · 145,904 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الأستاذ بيوض” (@bacmy084), 7,842 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bacmy084.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.