1 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC142 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Why Are We Avoiding These Realities Despite Them Being Clear And Evident?! https://t.me/bajmaaleng/379
Channel
The Official English Channel of The Noble Shaykh Abū Abdillāh Muḥammad Bā Jamāl
@bajmaaleng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
945subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001166327324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bajmaaleng |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bajmaaleng |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 945 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 941 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 940 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 939 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 939 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
1 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026
We advise people to purchase this book, to read through it, and to benefit from it, in order for one to be upon clarity in this matter. That is if the person is from Ahl al-Sunnah. But if they are from the ḥizbiyyīn, people of corrupt ideologies and desires, who go against the people of truth, then they are to be left off—after advising them concerning that which they are upon. And Allāh knows best.” ——— Translate…
1 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026
The point being, those from the people of knowledge who permitted taṣwīr did so based on ijtihād; they saw it to be necessary and something beneficial. But in reality, the benefit is little, and people are unable to differentiate the upright scholar from the misguided scholar who leads people away from the straight path. Whatever the case, if someone is a person of Sunnah and he holds this view, that is his choice. …
1 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC114 viewsread 8 August 2026
Co-operating in Daʿwah with Those of Ahl al-Sunnah Who See Taṣwīr to Be Permissible Shaykh Muḥammad Bā Jammāl—may Allāh preserve him—said: “The issue of taṣwīr is a serious matter and among the major sins; i.e., making images of living beings. The Prophet ﷺ informed that the image makers will be the most severely punished on the Day of Judgement. He also informed that every image maker will be in the Hellfire, and …
1 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC106 viewsread 8 August 2026
File
File, posted without a caption
31 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ▪️ Praying as a Traveller after the Adhaan is Called ▪️ Our Shaikh, Abu Abdillah Muhammad ba Jamaal - may Allah preserve him - was asked: 📥 Question: If the muadhin calls the adhaan for the afternoon prayer while I am traveling, is it permissible for me to pray two units of prayer, and shorten the salah on my own, or should I wait with them for the congregational prayer? 📤 Answer: The b…
30 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Ordering With Good But Not Partaking In It https://t.me/bajmaaleng/324
29 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC162 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
The Markaz of our Shaykh, Al-Muḥaddith, Muḥammad Bā Jamāl, may Allāh preserve him. #3 https://t.me/bajmaaleng/369
29 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC156 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
The Markaz of our Shaykh, Al-Muḥaddith, Muḥammad Bā Jamāl, may Allāh preserve him. #2 https://t.me/bajmaaleng/358
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bajmaaleng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Official English Channel of The Noble Shaykh Abū Abdillāh Muḥammad Bā Jamāl” (@bajmaaleng), 945 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bajmaaleng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.