Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خشایار وزیری🤍

Channel

خشایار وزیری🤍

@baksekhashi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,190subscribers

+6,795 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002945428441
TypeChannel
Username@baksekhashi
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/baksekhashi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

10,300 average views per post against 19,190 subscribers — an engagement rate of 53.5%. Across the 6,612 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.86% and 13.5%, with a median of 6.73%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled133,550
Mature posts only58.3% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers19,190 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 6,612 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 2.86% · p50 6.73% · p75 13.5% · p90 22.5%
Position in cohort99.017th percentile · 8.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.158% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,39519,19015,792.511 August 2026 — 12,395 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,456 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,635 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,344 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,538 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,627 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,806 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,875 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,989 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,110 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,251 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,291 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,298 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,342 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,346 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,364 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,153 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,348 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,415 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,637 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,706 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,693 subscribers9 September 2026 — 16,780 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,243 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,837 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,032 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,190 subscribers11 August 202617 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 37 days, net +6,795. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,376–20,209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:0119,190+158
15 Sept 2026, 08:3719,032+195
13 Sept 2026, 19:4018,837+594
11 Sept 2026, 22:2018,243+1,463
9 Sept 2026, 13:4116,780+1,087
6 Sept 2026, 05:4115,693-13
4 Sept 2026, 00:4215,706+69
2 Sept 2026, 18:2615,637+222
1 Sept 2026, 17:1815,415+67
31 Aug 2026, 17:4615,348+195
30 Aug 2026, 21:1415,153+789
29 Aug 2026, 19:3714,364+18
28 Aug 2026, 21:2514,346+4
27 Aug 2026, 22:5514,342+44
26 Aug 2026, 21:3314,298+7
25 Aug 2026, 22:3314,291+40
24 Aug 2026, 20:0814,251+141
23 Aug 2026, 03:5914,110+121
21 Aug 2026, 17:0713,989+114
20 Aug 2026, 12:0413,875first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.7%
avg views ÷ 19,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,730
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held72 (8 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total116,750
Reactions total9,750
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45,938 reactions across 70 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣24,21352.7%
16,37735.7%
🍓2,5945.65%
👍6961.52%
❤‍🔥4731.03%
🐳2860.623%
😍1980.431%
🔥1700.37%
👀1300.283%
😁1140.248%
💋1080.235%
😭770.168%
🦄690.15%
👎540.118%
🥰360.078%
👏340.074%
💔340.074%
🍾250.054%
🌚200.044%
💘200.044%
32 further kinds2100.457%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC≈4,490 views270 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

216😭26💔14👎4🔥4🐳2👀2👌1

2 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈6,010 views400 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcyEDN6AmFc/?igsi=MXd4eDF0NnIzcDB2bQ== پست جدید مورد علاقه‌ی خانم‌هاست بترکوندیش بزارین همه یاد بگیرن😋🤣 حمایت یادتون نره🤍🤍

354🔥22🤣8🐳5👏5🍓2🥰2👀1

1 Sept 2026, 22:28 UTC≈8,210 views339 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

https://t.me/baksekhashi

305🐳9🍓6💘5👀4😢4🔥3👎2

31 Aug 2026, 01:23 UTC≈8,880 views766 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

فردا ساعت ۱۲ تا ۱۲:۳۰ پست جدید با حمایتتون خیلی خوشحالم میکنین🤍

690❤‍🔥48😁11🍓5🐳5👀3💅2👍1

30 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈7,200 views944 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @babakoarianVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

519🤣395🍓14🐳9❤‍🔥3👀2🤨2

30 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈8,900 views1,299 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣1,16088🍓30😭8🐳3👀3🔥3🌚2

30 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈9,090 views1,033 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

587🤣404🍓19🔥9❤‍🔥5🐳3👀3🦄3

29 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC≈10,900 views1,210 reactionsread 3 September 2026

من آدمیم که جواب لبخند دیگران رو با لبخند می‌دم؛ با اشک بقیه قلبم مچاله می‌شه، وقتی پیشرفت و خوشحالی دیگران رو می‌بینم ذوق زده می‌شم، اگه توی خیابون یه سگ یا گربه ی گرسنه ببینم و بهش غذا ندم عذاب وجدان می‌گیرم، و همیشه اول برای همه آرزوهای خوب می‌کنم و بعد خودم ‌پس اگه اون روی منو دیدی توی خودت دنبال دلیل بگرد

1,090👍54🍓22🐳14👏8😎7❤‍🔥5💅3

29 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈9,170 views947 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @thebizbiVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

559🤣349🍓12👎5🐳4👀4🥱4💋3

29 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈15,300 views1,189 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

635🤣518🍓16💋7🐳5👀4🦄4

29 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC≈14,700 views976 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

584🤣367🍓10🐳6👀3🦄3😍3

26 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈13,900 views377 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

این ویدیو رو کیا ندیدن ؟ میرین ببینین 😍 https://youtu.be/OJqkkk5E27A

303🤣44❤‍🔥9👍5🥰5🐳42👀2

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @baksekhashi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@baksekhashi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خشایار وزیری🤍” (@baksekhashi), 19,190 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baksekhashi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.