Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BAKUL BIRAHI

Channel

BAKUL BIRAHI

@bakulbirahi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

144,492subscribers

-3,270 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002477504851
TypeChannel
Username@bakulbirahi
DescriptionWELCOME TO BAKUL BIRAHI🔞 🚧 Disclaimer : All The Content in this Channel is Either forwarded From Other Channels Or Taken From the Internet, we Don't Own Any Content. DONASI : @botdonasibirahibot https://t.me/BIRAHI_HUB
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bakulbirahi

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

142,707147,762145,234.57 August 2026 — 147,762 subscribers8 August 2026 — 147,675 subscribers9 August 2026 — 147,410 subscribers10 August 2026 — 147,180 subscribers11 August 2026 — 146,960 subscribers12 August 2026 — 146,725 subscribers13 August 2026 — 146,905 subscribers14 August 2026 — 146,768 subscribers15 August 2026 — 146,528 subscribers17 August 2026 — 146,155 subscribers18 August 2026 — 145,852 subscribers19 August 2026 — 145,605 subscribers20 August 2026 — 145,389 subscribers21 August 2026 — 145,089 subscribers23 August 2026 — 144,791 subscribers25 August 2026 — 144,498 subscribers26 August 2026 — 144,217 subscribers27 August 2026 — 144,065 subscribers28 August 2026 — 143,908 subscribers29 August 2026 — 143,703 subscribers30 August 2026 — 143,564 subscribers31 August 2026 — 143,367 subscribers1 September 2026 — 143,158 subscribers2 September 2026 — 142,955 subscribers3 September 2026 — 142,780 subscribers5 September 2026 — 142,707 subscribers8 September 2026 — 143,473 subscribers11 September 2026 — 143,984 subscribers13 September 2026 — 144,122 subscribers14 September 2026 — 144,269 subscribers16 September 2026 — 144,418 subscribers18 September 2026 — 144,492 subscribers144,4927 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -3,270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141,949–148,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:15144,492+74
16 Sept 2026, 08:59144,418+149
14 Sept 2026, 14:20144,269+147
13 Sept 2026, 01:20144,122+138
11 Sept 2026, 01:17143,984+511
8 Sept 2026, 03:57143,473+766
5 Sept 2026, 02:39142,707-73
3 Sept 2026, 09:25142,780-175
2 Sept 2026, 06:03142,955-203
1 Sept 2026, 03:09143,158-209
31 Aug 2026, 00:18143,367-197
30 Aug 2026, 03:28143,564-139
29 Aug 2026, 06:07143,703-205
28 Aug 2026, 02:53143,908-157
27 Aug 2026, 03:32144,065-152
26 Aug 2026, 02:03144,217-281
25 Aug 2026, 00:49144,498-293
23 Aug 2026, 10:27144,791-298
21 Aug 2026, 23:47145,089-300
20 Aug 2026, 14:42145,389first reading

Engagement

1,276 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.792%
avg views ÷ 144,492 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
751 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.103%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
851
of 1,276 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 301 of 751 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held1,276 (7 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total859,783
Reactions total409
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 00:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,240
Videos
330
Links
4,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 18m
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 122 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

522 reactions across 351 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
49594.8%
👍81.53%
🥰50.958%
🔥40.766%
👏30.575%
🤔30.575%
20.383%
🍌10.192%
😍10.192%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 377 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 522 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 00:01 UTC161 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Punya ayangg g3d3 bng3ttt buat puass https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzkwMDQ3MDIxMTY2NTU

20 Sept 2026, 23:01 UTC282 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Di g3r3p3 g3r3p3 ayanggg https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzgwMDA3NjA4NTUxNTA

20 Sept 2026, 22:01 UTC368 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Ayangg main nya dari b3lakangg https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzY5OTY4MTk1OTM2NDU

1

20 Sept 2026, 21:01 UTC438 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Lingg3rii nya m3nggoda angttt https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzQ5ODg5MzcwNzA2MzU

20 Sept 2026, 20:02 UTC565 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Ayangg malu maluu ny3pongin nya https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzU5OTI4NzgzMzIxNDA

20 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC746 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Anuu nya pingg angtt ci https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzE5NzcxMTMyODYxMjA

1

20 Sept 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Aynggg t3rima b3r3s aja https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzI5ODEwNTQ1NDc2MjU

20 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Om3 d3ngannn pakaiann banny ituu https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTIwMzM5ODQ5OTU4MDkxMzA

1

20 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,290 views2 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

L3sbi0laa lagii calinggg ng3puacinnn https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTE5NTA2NTc4NzExMDQyMTU

2

20 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Dua p3l3mpuann bilahiii salingg m3puacinn https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTE5NDk2NTM5Mjk4NDI3MTA

20 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Msbl3w main gam3 cama cuamii b3rujungg b3rcintaa https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTE5NDg2NDk5ODg1ODEyMDU

20 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Awall nya tiumannn duluu baruu mainn https://t.me/BAKULBIRAHIBOT?start=Z2V0LTE5NDY2NDIxMDYwNTgxOTU

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,276 posts we hold for @bakulbirahi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bakulbirahi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 September 2026
Most recent edit
18 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BAKUL BIRAHI” (@bakulbirahi), 144,492 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bakulbirahi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.