Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Balance Channel

Channel

Balance Channel

@balancepublic

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,489subscribers

-467 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001379498728
TypeChannel
Username@balancepublic
DescriptionСообщество трейдеров и инвесторов с общими целями и интересами: - Еженедельные обзоры рынка - Авторские индикаторы для торговли - Выборка важнейших новостей - Ончейн метрики и др. Сотрудничество @balancetradeadmin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/balancepublic

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,48910,95610,722.57 August 2026 — 10,956 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,956 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,955 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,946 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,941 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,934 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,930 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,923 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,920 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,908 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,901 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,894 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,885 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,879 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,872 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,857 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,849 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,841 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,833 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,825 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,821 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,820 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,814 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,810 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,807 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,790 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,774 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,749 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,731 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,724 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,715 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,706 subscribers1 October 2026 — 10,647 subscribers6 October 2026 — 10,621 subscribers10 October 2026 — 10,601 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,592 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,581 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,577 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,572 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,570 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,565 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,563 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,552 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,547 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,544 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,539 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,528 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,527 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,525 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,521 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,516 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,515 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,507 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,503 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,498 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,491 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,489 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -467. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,419–11,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 06:3710,489-2
3 Nov 2026, 03:4910,491-7
2 Nov 2026, 03:3610,498-5
1 Nov 2026, 04:5910,503-4
31 Oct 2026, 04:2110,507-8
30 Oct 2026, 01:4710,515-1
29 Oct 2026, 00:0910,516-5
27 Oct 2026, 21:3810,521-4
26 Oct 2026, 22:4410,525-2
25 Oct 2026, 23:2610,527-1
25 Oct 2026, 00:2010,528-11
24 Oct 2026, 01:5110,539-5
23 Oct 2026, 01:5010,544-3
21 Oct 2026, 21:3510,547-5
20 Oct 2026, 19:0610,552-11
19 Oct 2026, 20:2610,563-2
18 Oct 2026, 20:4610,565-5
17 Oct 2026, 23:5910,570-2
16 Oct 2026, 23:1110,572-5
16 Oct 2026, 02:0810,577first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.47%
avg views ÷ 10,489 subscribers
Avg views / post
679
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held43 (10 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total6,112
Reactions total336
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,840
Videos
≈540
Links
≈3,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 25s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,543 reactions across 42 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍34422.3%
❤29118.9%
🔥27217.6%
🐳22414.5%
🕊1378.88%
👌634.08%
💯593.82%
🏆352.27%
👻352.27%
😁312.01%
🤣301.94%
🦄181.17%
🎉20.13%
🥰20.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,543 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 43 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @balancepublic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (55.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 15:30 UTC238 views28 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @balancetradepulicPhoto

Привет Лонг по BTC удерживаю. Как писал ранее, если появится вторая пачка ниже 76900 и позиция закротся в убыток (на 73590), то готов делать вторую попытку. Пока позиция болтается рядом с TBX. Был рост от TBX на 2%, но я не трогал. От таких аномалий среднестатистический рост от 8%, если покупатель в теме Цена сходила к лимиткам ОKX на 77400. На данный момент OKX ждет на 71500, 86100, 105200 Спроса на споте на гл…

🔥12❤8👍8

Signed Sasha Balance

30 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTC755 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

CZ - ёба...й капитан-очевидность🐧 Но самое интересное, что это был самый крупный хак в истории крипторынка, а BTC просел всего на 5%. Нет продавцов получается... Trade|Channel|Chat|Alerts|Bot

😁13👍10👻7❤6💯6

Signed Sasha Balance

29 Oct 2026, 14:43 UTC829 views39 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Этот рынок очень напоминает ситуацию лета 2023 год В 2023 году #BTC впервые значительно отскочил от дна, но на его пути возник ажиотаж вокруг мемов и альтов. После этого волатильность снизилась. В этом году ситуация развивается по той же схеме: волатильность сейчас находится на минимумах Cмотрю на эту всю возню на крипте, как падает волатильность, как ончейн заходит свежий капитал и складывается ощущение, что рынок…

🐳12🔥10👍7❤5🕊5

Signed Sasha Balance

28 Oct 2026, 21:26 UTC751 views40 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

1. В #BTC поступает свежий капитал. Такое происходит только на бычьих рынках. 2. Когда доля #BTC удерживаемых более 18 месяцев по всей сети, растёт, а затем начинает снижаться, за этим обычно следует бычий рынок Trade|Channel|Chat|Alerts|Bot

❤16👍9🕊9🐳6

Signed Sasha Balance

23 Oct 2026, 22:19 UTC550 views37 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @balancetradepulicPhoto

Привет С ходом получения опыта в трейдинге у Balance Trade сложилась своя идеология: "Руками торгуются стратегии до 20 сделок в год. Всю высокочастотную дрочню нужно сремиться отдать торговым ботам" Не раз уже упоминал, что работаем над своей платформой по анализу лимитных метрик, чтобы на основе собранных данных писать торговые стратегии под ботов, т.к. в чужих ботов рука не поднимается размещать больше 3-5% от ка…

👍18❤10🔥7🐳2

Signed Sasha Balance

23 Oct 2026, 22:19 UTC663 views33 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Уже давно удостоверился в том, что на мир необходимо смотреть с призмы перемещения капитала, а не новостных заголовков Неужели у Европы все так плохо? Экономические показатели говорят о другом: https://youtu.be/MvlUk7eIfQs?si=bfG0EX3wK8LX0dbu Аналитика и торговые решения здесь

❤14👍11🐳6🔥1🕊1

Signed Sasha Balance

20 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC611 views42 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @balancetradepulicPhoto

Привет Лонг по #ETH продолжаю удерживать. На снижении в воскресенье увидели вторую пачку Double Diamonds💎💎 В публичном канале давал комментарий в момент его появления. Если покупатель еще в теме, то имеем возможнлсть сходить минимум к 2600. Будем наблюдать По анализу лимитов TOTAL видно, что давление продавца за крайние несколько дней значительно выросло, а аски скинули до обьемов, которые были на 63к по битку. Это…

👍22❤13🔥4🐳3

Signed Sasha Balance

20 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC763 views35 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Каждый минимум цикла на этом графике в то время казался концом #BTC Аналитика и торговые решения здесь

👍11❤8🐳8🔥8

Signed Sasha Balance

13 Oct 2026, 16:55 UTC952 views40 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

#BTC отскочил от базы стоимости ETF Большую часть этого года цена находилась ниже этого уровня, а майский рост застопорился прямо под ним В настоящее время этот уровень дважды выступил в качестве поддержки на отметке около 81500. Ниже него следующим важным уровнем является истинное среднее рыночное значение на отметке 77500 Аналитика и торговые решения здесь

👍15❤14🐳5🔥3🕊3

Signed Sasha Balance

5 Oct 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,210 views39 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

#BTC находится на треть ниже своего рекордного уровня, однако по показателю MVRV Z-Score он по-прежнему не является дорогостоящим Этот индикатор сравнивает текущую цену с той, которую заплатили держатели, и в настоящее время он вернулся к справедливой стоимости, находясь далеко от прошлых максимумов Аналитика и торговые решения здесь

👍16❤14🔥7🐳1🦄1

Signed Alex Balance

1 Oct 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,410 views28 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

1. Bitcoin Percent Unrealised Profit Нынешний избыток нереализованной прибыли в #BTC не может оказать значительное давление на рынок. Прибыли слишком мало, чтобы оправдать продажи 2. BTC Sellside Risk Ratio Продавцы исчерпали свои силы Аналитика и торговые решения здесь

👍16🐳8🔥2🎉1🕊1

Signed Alex Balance

29 Sept 2026, 01:17 UTC993 views37 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Photo

Борьба добра со злом это иллюзия, на которой построены все религии и учения. Все едино... При победе добра над злом, добро в этот же момент делится на добро и зло. Одно и другое существует как единое целое и не может друг без друга В убийце и насильнике живет святой, а в святом - убийца и насильник Люди, которые живут в парадигме деления мира на хорошее и плохое обрекают себя на вечные в страдания в поисках справе…

❤16👍10🔥7🕊4

Signed Alex Balance

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @balancepublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 17:19 UTCAnonymous Poll146 voters

Аргентина или Испания?

  1. 🇦🇷52%
  2. 🇪🇸49%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AmirCapital | Официальный канал
@amir_capital · 19,088
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 October 2026
ULTRADE Announcements
@ULTRADE_Announcement · 29,425
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Letit Insider
@letit_ai · 35,857
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
Coin Side | AI х заработок
@coinside_public · 26,675
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
🖖 Поток Лилы
@LeelaPotok · 21,166
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Balance Channel” (@balancepublic), 10,489 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/balancepublic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.