Channel
@baliangyw
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
675subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001294954125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baliangyw |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baliangyw |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 675 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:04 | 690 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 696 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 699 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 700 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 703 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
https://t.me/nft/DurovsCap-2492 https://t.me/nft/NailBracelet-3103 https://t.me/nft/NailBracelet-2434 https://t.me/nft/SnoopDogg-492447 https://t.me/nft/SnoopDogg-464677 https://t.me/nft/SnoopDogg-262905 https://t.me/nft/SnoopDogg-218735 在链礼物
维护完成，可正常下单使用
各位老板稍等
维护中
今晚代理网络似乎有波动，不过高倍率线路一切正常，换个线路就行，不再一一回复。 恢复正常
https://t.me/nft/MoodPack-6025 黑底书包
https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-247407 https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-51649 https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-82402 https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-81377 新到4个礼物需要联系
今晚出售的会员和星星皆无售后，遵循愿赌服输的原则
超低价出售礼物
没来及的就没了
拉闸
解答一下哈目前不是盗刷，只是飞机bug来的
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @baliangyw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“导航频道丨记住八两拼音永不失联 @baliang” (@baliangyw), 675 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baliangyw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.