Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for банан.zip

Channel

банан.zip

@bananzip

Not marked by Telegram, checked 1 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,519subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194296078
TypeChannel
Username@bananzip
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bananzip

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5192,5492,5347 August 2026 — 2,549 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,549 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,540 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,529 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,519 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,528 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,521 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,525 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,522 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,519 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,515–2,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:212,519-3
12 Sept 2026, 00:402,522-3
7 Sept 2026, 13:402,525+4
2 Sept 2026, 11:032,521-3
30 Aug 2026, 09:472,524-4
27 Aug 2026, 10:062,528+9
24 Aug 2026, 12:572,519-2
17 Aug 2026, 12:242,521-8
13 Aug 2026, 18:262,529-11
10 Aug 2026, 22:062,540-9
7 Aug 2026, 13:332,549no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:092,549first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍌9695.0%
👎54.95%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bananzip. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC297 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Подписывайтесь на Никиту, он крутой. И прочитайте его лонгрид о том, как ставить цели агентам, он тоже крутой. пс. Если вас зовут Никита, шанс получить рекомендацию на этом канале повышается в 10 раз

🍌3

6 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC306 views4 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Ну не могу не закинуть в такой пост, а вдруг полезно будет) https://github.com/N1arko/redaktura-skills

🍌4

6 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC299 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Собираю по-тихоньку себе скиллы для агентов: 1. Сделал скилл, который сам делает красивые титры для роликов. Можно задавать разные стили, и агент будет их применять. Получается в сто раз лучше чем автоматика в любом другом софте типа CapCut, где просто базовые глупые анимашки. В каждый стиль можно встроить свои шрифты и их комбинации, задать правила типографики, переносов, защиту от слишком коротких нечитаемых титро

🍌5

6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC384 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Знаете, почему ИИ-боты поддержки такие тупые? Прочитал пост у Владимира Иванова, где он возмущается нежеланием бота от МТС позвать оператора и рассказывает лайфхак: если написать "Уроды", то бот сразу переводит чат на оператора. (Я уже давно сразу пишу "позови человека блять", это всегда и везде работает, дальше объясню почему) Владимир говорит, что проблема в плохих отечественных нейросетях, и предлагает поставить

🍌10

4 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC547 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Подписывайтесь на Никиту, он крутой

👎3🍌2

4 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC539 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sharipovnikita

Сегодня в телеграмм каналах коллег появилась петиция со сбором подписей к Seedance, чтобы он заговорил на русском языке хорошо. Очень классная инициатива, но хочу раскрыть немного непубличной информации из закрытых переговоров с сиденсом, которые мы ведем последний месяц. Ситуация была такая, 2 месяца назад сиденс начали искать внутри РФ \ СНГ кто сможет помочь им сделать региональную экспансию и так получилось что

🍌2👎2

3 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC678 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Александр, я хочу знать ВСЁ. Вот правда, СОВЕРШЕННО ВСЁ об агентах. Всё можно обсудить с ллм, но разве это лучший вариант из всех? Нужны ли учителя, если есть учебники? Или есть какая-то субстанция, которая недостижима для ЛЛМ сейчас? Я думаю что да, и называется она эмпирический опыт. У иишки его нет пока

3 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC667 viewsread 7 August 2026

Кстати, Спасибо всем кто написал! 🥰 Вас оказалось много, поэтому я на днях отдельно всё прочитаю и каждому отвечу. Вы лучшие. 🤭

3 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC660 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я прям снова испытываю СТОЯЧОК на нейронки благодаря всему этому движу с агентами. Всё-таки ChatGPT уже больше трёх лет назад вышел, вау-эффект от болталки уже пропал. Поиск стал базой, я уже и не помню когда вручную лазал по всем ссылкам из первой страницы поиска, как раньше. Всякие СааСики, которые я сюда раньше постоянно скидывал, тоже бесконечно копируют друг друга, свежего и достойного практически нет. Фото и в

🍌5

3 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC594 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Стадия отрицания: Как кто-то может израсходовать эти лимиты? Стадия принятия:

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bananzip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Смотри, Морозов и ИИ
@mmmorozov · 61,416
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 53,680
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Lama AI
@lama_channel_gpt · 24,736
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“банан.zip” (@bananzip), 2,519 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bananzip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.