Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Banny Bleibt Ticker

Channel

Banny Bleibt Ticker

@bannybleibt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,471subscribers

+105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002208909502
TypeChannel
Username@bannybleibt
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bannybleibt

Growth

1,3661,4711,418.56 August 2026 — 1,366 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,366 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,372 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,376 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,377 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,381 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,390 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,405 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,460 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,471 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net +105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,350–1,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 01:551,471+11
3 Sept 2026, 13:171,460+54
30 Aug 2026, 23:281,406+1
28 Aug 2026, 07:251,405+15
25 Aug 2026, 09:081,390+9
22 Aug 2026, 15:321,381+4
19 Aug 2026, 15:031,377+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:191,376+4
13 Aug 2026, 07:151,372+4
9 Aug 2026, 22:111,368+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:301,366no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:511,366first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

201 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7939.3%
🤬5024.9%
💔3014.9%
❤‍🔥136.47%
👍83.98%
🔥73.48%
👀41.99%
😡31.49%
😱20.995%
🙊20.995%
🤔20.995%
😭10.498%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,980 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🚨Cops bedrohen Aktivistis von uns & SEKler schneiden 2 Baumhäuser runter..🤬 Rip: Lumière & Somewhere. "Wenn dein Hund sich losreißt können wir für nichts garantieren." -Cops zu Mensch auf Baumhaus, um Mensch zu Boden zu zwingen.😡 Hallo Menschis, wie ihr schon wisst, hatten wir mittwochs netten Polizeibesuch... Sie standen circa 9 Uhr morgens bei uns auf der Matte oder besser gesagt vor 🏳️‍🌈Rainbow- unserer größten

💔27🤬7❤‍🔥2👍2😱2

29 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC≈2,240 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Kommt in den Wald! Menschen brauchen dringend Support!💚 Banny Bleibt!

27

29 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC≈2,100 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Nachdem ein Gericht entschieden hat, dass Baumhäuser Versammlungsmittel entscheiden die Cops wohl jetzt, dass sie das doch nicht so sehen. Oder zumindest nur bei manchen Baumhäusern? Wer weiß schon. Sie wollen ein Baumhaus abbauen, sagen aber die Versammlung wird nicht aufgelöst. Also ob uns das interessieren würde, der Rechtsstaat ist eine Farce und wenn die Cops es wollen brechen sie sowieso jedes Gesetz. Wir prote

21🤬7❤‍🔥5💔1

29 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,060 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Klettercops und Feuerwehr sind auch da

👀4😡3

29 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,500 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Cops immer noch da. Wollen eine Plattform abbauen und haben Menschen am Boden schikaniert.

🤬82🤔2😭1

29 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC847 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Cops wieder im Wald klauen unsre Schubkarre und bretter :(

🤬10💔2🙊2❤‍🔥1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 22:04 UTC745 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OsthangBleibtPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

25 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,010 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

16-20 Cops waren grade im Wald (ca 8:50-9:50). Dabei schienen die nichts besseres zu tun zu haben als uns wieder Essen & weiteres Materialien zu klauen. Besorgt euch mal eurer eigenes Frühstück, anstatt von uns zu klauen! Unsere sorgfältig mit Steinen ausgelegte sichere Feuerstelle haben die Bullen zerlegt & die Steine & das Gitter geklaut. Wollt ihr, dass wir lieber unsicher, ohne Steine um's Feuer herum, Feuer ma

🤬18❤‍🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTCviews —

Banny Bleibt Ticker pinned «Call for Support🤝 Der Banny ist gerade viel Druck ausgesetzt. Die Stadt Langen hat uns eine Deadline bis zum 27.7 gegeben, um Auflagen einer weiteren neuen Allgemeinverfügung zu erfüllen, die komplett absurd sind, zur Schikane gedacht sind & uns von unserem…»

23 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC819 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @waldstattasphalt_infoPhoto

KletterTraining mit Schwerpunkt How to AKT: Wie bringe ich meinen Freund*innen und weiteren Personen klettern bei? 🧗‍♂️ Vom 24.08. - 30.08 2026 wird es in Südniedersachsen ein Freies Klettertraning (FKT) geben. Schwerpunkt: Wie werden AktionsKletterTrainings organisiert und gehalten um deine Friends ins Baumhaus zu holen und Wissenshierachien abzubauen (Themen u.a. Klettertechniken, Orga, Küfa, Finanzierung, Ortsfi

👍51

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bannybleibt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Banny Bleibt Ticker” (@bannybleibt), 1,471 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bannybleibt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.