28 measurements spanning 33 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,301–16,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 06:20
16,407
+3
5 Sept 2026, 02:40
16,404
+6
3 Sept 2026, 12:01
16,398
+8
2 Sept 2026, 02:48
16,390
+4
31 Aug 2026, 23:57
16,386
+7
30 Aug 2026, 20:03
16,379
+4
29 Aug 2026, 20:25
16,375
+5
28 Aug 2026, 19:33
16,370
-1
27 Aug 2026, 18:16
16,371
-3
26 Aug 2026, 21:37
16,374
-3
25 Aug 2026, 22:55
16,377
+6
25 Aug 2026, 01:43
16,371
+8
23 Aug 2026, 15:37
16,363
+10
22 Aug 2026, 00:16
16,353
+14
20 Aug 2026, 17:08
16,339
-1
19 Aug 2026, 15:07
16,340
+8
18 Aug 2026, 14:13
16,332
-6
17 Aug 2026, 16:08
16,338
+1
14 Aug 2026, 20:03
16,337
+10
13 Aug 2026, 13:47
16,327
first reading
Engagement
552 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.34%
avg views ÷ 16,407 subscribers
Avg views / post
219
469 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
469
of 552 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 90 of 469 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
552 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
102,850
Reactions total
132
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
151 reactions across 96 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
41
27.2%
❤
37
24.5%
😁
16
10.6%
🤡
13
8.61%
👎
10
6.62%
🔥
9
5.96%
🤣
7
4.64%
🍌
4
2.65%
🌚
3
1.99%
👏
3
1.99%
🍾
2
1.32%
💩
2
1.32%
🎉
1
0.662%
💅
1
0.662%
🗿
1
0.662%
🥱
1
0.662%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 552 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 552 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Change the date of anti-reservation protest: Delhi High Court to Kshatriya Karni Sena
The Court said that it will hear the matter after considering the response of the Delhi Police.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/change-the-date-of-anti-reservation-protest-delhi-high-court-to-kshatriya-karni-sena
Delhi court grants bail to AAP's Satyendar Jain in ACB case
Jain was arrested by the ACB on August 18 in connection with alleged irregularities in the tendering process for sewage treatment plant projects of the Delhi Jal Board (DJB).
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/delhi-court-grants-bail-to-aaps-satyendar-jain-in-acb-case
Punjab & Haryana High Court quashes dismissal of DSP accused of facilitating Lawrence Bishnoi TV interview
Interviews of gangster Lawrence Bishnoi, accused in the Sidhu Moosewala murder case, were broadcast by ABP Sanjha in March 2023.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/punjab-haryana-high-court-quashes-dismissal-of-dsp-accused-of-facilitating-lawrence-bishnoi-tv-interview
Plea in Supreme Court to stop perks, amenities to Constitutional functionaries who resign to avoid removal
The Court issued notice to the government on a plea by one Pratik Vira flagging the trend of Constitutional functionaries resigning from office to avoid removal.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/plea-in-supreme-court-to-stop-perks-amenities-to-constitutional-functionaries-who-resign-to-avoid-removal
NEET leak: Delhi HC allows two candidates named as CBI witnesses to take part in counselling for admission
The Court observed that the allegations against the candidates had not yet been tested in accordance with law and that withholding their results could lead to consequences that may not be adequately remedied later.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/neet-leak-delhi-hc-allows-two-candidates-named-as-cb…
Absence of word 'penetration' in child victim's testimony not ground to acquit rape accused: Delhi HC
A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja of High Court held that the trial court committed a grave error by insisting on technical language from a toddler.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/absence-of-word-penetration-in-child-victims-testimony-not-ground-to-acquit-rape-accused-delhi-hc
BCI has no power to take disciplinary action against law students: Supreme Court rules after NALSAR row
Such power is vested in the university or educational institution in which the students are enrolled, the Court said.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/bci-has-no-power-to-take-disciplinary-action-against-law-students-supreme-court-rules-after-nalsar-row
Delhi High Court restrains K Kavitha from making allegations against The Pioneer newspaper
A ₹11 crore defamation suit has been filed against Kavitha for her allegations that the 160-year-old daily was secretly acquired by KTR and now reflects BRS' views.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/delhi-high-court-restrains-k-kavitha-from-making-allegations-against-the-pioneer-newspaper
Delhi SIR: Delhi HC says booth level agents of political parties liable only for elector details they can verify
Delhi Congress leaders had approached the HC against ECI mandate requiring BLAs to give undertakings that they verified all particulars contained in enumeration forms.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/delhi-sir-delhi-hc-says-booth-level-agents-of-political-parties-liable-only-for-elector-details-they-can…
Approach High Court: Supreme Court to lawyers assaulted during protest against BCI Chairman
Justice Bagchi remarked that lawyers ordinarily should not resort to protests as they belong to a disciplined community. The law gives them the opportunity to approach the appropriate forum, he said.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/approach-high-court-supreme-court-to-lawyers-assaulted-during-protest-against-bci-chairman
Supreme Court orders release of YouTuber Gulshan Pahuja who made allegations against judges
In May this year, the Delhi High Court sentenced Pahuja to six months of imprisonment and a ₹2,000 fine for committing criminal contempt of court.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/supreme-court-orders-release-of-youtuber-gulshan-pahuja-who-made-allegations-against-judges
Madras High Court dismisses MK Stalin’s plea alleging irregularities in EVM verification
The Election Commission had argued that the writ petition was barred by Article 329(b) and that Stalin’s remedy lay in an election petition.
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-dismisses-mk-stalins-plea-alleging-irregularities-in-evm-verification
Showing the 12 most recent of 552 posts we hold for @bar_and_bench. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Live Law @livelawindia · 38,857 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
The Hindu Opinion @The_Hindu_Editorial_News · 51,370 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
The Hindu @THnewsupdates · 248,929 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Hindustan Times- Official Channel @hindustantimes · 63,544 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
Shubham Upadhyay - The Law Tales @theshubhamsir · 29,270 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
PW Law Wallah JUDICIARY @pwlawwallah · 84,361 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
The Indian Express @indianexpress · 122,029 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bar & Bench” (@bar_and_bench), 16,407 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bar_and_bench.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.