Getting dolled up is my favourite hobby😄
custom 52898620889052344643custom 52897609467203833232custom 52897746863207624992

Channel
@barbiecartier
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002150914317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @barbiecartier |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/barbiecartier |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 1 | -42 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 43 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 44 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 44 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5289862088905234464 | 45 | 32.8% | |
| custom 5289774686320762499 | 30 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5289606010070144123 | 17 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5287403151408798672 | 13 | 9.49% | |
| custom 5289760946720383323 | 11 | 8.03% | |
| custom 5287692782528406083 | 8 | 5.84% | |
| custom 5287527555136527246 | 7 | 5.11% | |
| custom 5289675227763085730 | 6 | 4.38% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Getting dolled up is my favourite hobby😄
custom 52898620889052344643custom 52897609467203833232custom 52897746863207624992
Слишком много их что-то развелось. Персонажи с угольными авами Чонгука, которые такими движениями на похуях и на пафосах оскорбляют его и сознательно строят вокруг себя образы «Мне на все похуй/Я грубый/Я черствый/Я выше этого» Забавно от них слышать рассуждения про «девушки выкладывают такое, потому что обделены вниманием» от людей с постами в духе «принимайте меня таким, какой я есть, и успокоительное». А почему то…
custom 52898620889052344643custom 52874031514087986722custom 52875275551365272461custom 52897746863207624991
Женская ненависть выходит из пинка в лицо от мужчины. Мужская от того что не разрешили пнуть женщину в лицо
custom 52898620889052344644custom 52897746863207624993custom 52896060100701441232
File, posted without a caption
Они не видят ничего плохого в своих поступках, поэтому и неосторожны, потому что окружают себя друзьями, которые считают это нормой и будут оправдывать их
custom 52898620889052344644custom 52876927825284060833custom 52896060100701441232custom 52897746863207624992
Я уверена тем, что тот, кто воспользовался моей добротой, нарушил мой покой и жестоко обращался со мной, когда у меня были только чистые намерения, ждет плохая участь или в этом мире (А ему лучше в этом) или в мире вечном. Главный хадис о мольбе обиженного (притесненного) гласит: «Бойся мольбы притесненного, ибо, поистине, между ней и Аллахом нет преграды». Пророк Мухаммад (с.а.с) сказал это, когда отправлял сподвижн…
custom 52897609467203833234custom 52898620889052344644custom 52896060100701441233custom 52897746863207624993
Выглядишь как их дочь
custom 52898620889052344643custom 52896060100701441232custom 52897746863207624992
Хотя по фигуре больше Лалиса
custom 52876927825284060833custom 52897609467203833233custom 52897746863207624993
Из тебя вышла бы айдолша по популярности и харизме как Дженни и Вонён
custom 52874031514087986723custom 52898620889052344643custom 52875275551365272462
Video, posted without a caption
custom 52896752277630857303custom 52898620889052344643custom 52874031514087986722
Грань, когда немного переборщил с духовностью и обнаружил, что теперь даже те кто казались глубокими и интересными таковыми больше не кажутся..
custom 52898620889052344644custom 52896752277630857303custom 52896060100701441232custom 52897746863207624992
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52898620889052344644custom 52874031514087986722custom 52896060100701441232custom 52897746863207624992
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @barbiecartier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Барби” (@barbiecartier), 1 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barbiecartier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.