Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FC BARCELONA

Channel

FC BARCELONA

@barcelonaenn

Not marked by Telegram, checked 2 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,291subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002193352220
TypeChannel
Username@barcelonaenn
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/barcelonaenn

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2911,3181,304.516 August 2026 — 1,318 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,316 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,315 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,311 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,307 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,308 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,307 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,309 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,305 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,300 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,291 subscribers16 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,287–1,322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 08:211,291-9
14 Sept 2026, 11:151,300-5
10 Sept 2026, 15:191,305-4
5 Sept 2026, 08:371,309+2
1 Sept 2026, 16:041,307-1
30 Aug 2026, 00:171,308+1
27 Aug 2026, 01:541,307-4
24 Aug 2026, 05:181,311-4
20 Aug 2026, 05:481,315-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:531,316-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:451,318first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3869.1%
👍610.9%
👏59.09%
🔥47.27%
👎11.82%
🥰11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC253 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎖️| Caicedo has only recently joined training under Juliano Belletti after arriving from Quito, so his debut will depend on the coach's assessment of his fitness following his travels. His adaptation will focus on adjusting to Barça Atlètic's possession-based style, emphasizing short passing, composure, and combination play. [scapde_45] #fcblive

1

15 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC256 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

❗| Hansi Flick’s coaching staff are IMPRESSED with Anthony Gordon. The Englishman has arrived in excellent physical condition, looks very strong and has quickly adapted to the team’s training methods and dynamics. [alexpintanel] #fcblive 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿⚡

15 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC253 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨| 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: Al-Hilal will TERMINATE João Cancelo's contract, paving the way for him to join Barça. [ H_swilhy - pending further confirmation] #fcblive 💥

👏5

15 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC347 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎖️| Borussia Dortmund have already opened talks with Barcelona over Héctor Fort and are currently leading the race to sign the young defender. While Fort is also interested in a move to the Premier League, Dortmund remain the club showing the strongest and most concrete interest at this stage. [MatteMoretto] #fcblive

👍21

15 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC339 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨| 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋: Barcelona and PSG have reached an agreement for the transfer of Ferran Torres. #fcblive 🔴🔵✅

🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC332 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎖| 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: Barcelona make THIRD offer to Man City for Rodri. A total €70M package. [JacobsBen] #fcblive 💥

🔥4

15 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC335 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

❗| The club has generated nearly €70M in transfers this summer: • Ferran Torres – Sold for ~€50M, generating an estimated ~€40M net profit after amortization. • Ansu Fati – Transferred to AS Monaco for €11M after they exercised their purchase option. • Jofre Torrents – Move to Ajax could bring €5.5M for 50% of his rights, subject to performance-related conditions. • Jan Virgil – Barça received €4.8M (40% of the €

3

15 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC361 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎖️| Talks have taken place between Barça and BVB for Hector Fort. Dortmund are fully informed about all the details surrounding a potential move for the RB. [Plettigoal] #fcblive

👍31

15 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC359 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨| 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐈𝐍: Barça seals Jofre Torrents to Ajax for about €6M and 50% of his future rights. [sport] #fcblive 🌟

2👍1

15 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC358 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🚨🚨🎖️| 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐌𝐄𝐃: Barça have INDEED made HUGE ADVANCEMENTS in the Rodri case. [monfortcarlos] #fcblive

4

15 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC362 views6 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎖️| 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: HUGE progress has been made in the Rodri deal. Barça will go upto €70M and expect the player to arrive by MONDAY. [Nilsola10] #fcblive 💣

6

14 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC387 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨🔵🔴 EXCLUSIVE: Barcelona consider Sporting striker Luis Suárez among options — if Julián Álvarez deal doesn’t happen. Not easy as key player for Sporting but part of Barça shortlist. Barça will only consider Suárez/more options from next week — if Julián deal is still off.

👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @barcelonaenn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FC BARCELONA™
@FCBarcelonaenn · 97,382
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
UEFA Champions League
@uefa_champ_league · 55,434
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 2 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FC BARCELONA” (@barcelonaenn), 1,291 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barcelonaenn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.