Channel
@bargesabzeravan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,085subscribers
+124 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002212430896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bargesabzeravan |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bargesabzeravan |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 2,085 | +20 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 2,065 | +22 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 2,043 | +11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 2,032 | +13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:25 | 2,019 | +26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,993 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 1,989 | +23 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 1,966 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 1,964 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 1,957 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 1,959 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 1,964 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 1,965 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 1,961 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 1,961 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
79 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 41.8% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 26.6% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 6.33% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 6.33% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما کارهایی هستیم که نمیکنیم، نههایی هستیم که میگوییم؛ شخصیت آدمها بیشتر در مرزهایشان شکل میگیرد تا در انتخابهایشان. ما کارهایی هستیم که نمیکنیم، نههایی هستیم که میگوییم؛ گاهی آنچه از آن میگذریم، بیشتر از آنچه به دست میآوریم ما را تعریف میکند. ما کارهایی هستیم که نمیکنیم، نههایی هستیم که میگوییم؛ چون هویت، فقط از انتخابها ساخته نمیشود، از چشمپوشیها هم ساخته میشود. ما را بیشتر «نه»هایمان میسازند…
امیدوارم امروز زنگ بخوره گوشیتون و یه صدایی از پشت خط بگه:مُشتلق بده...!🌱💚
😍5
هایت معتقد است تلفنهای هوشمند و شبکههای اجتماعی باعث نوعی «بازسیمکشی بزرگ دوران کودکی» شدهاند؛ تغییری که به باور او میتواند با افزایش مشکلاتی مانند اضطراب، افسردگی و کاهش سلامت روان نوجوانان مرتبط باشد. دیدگاه او باعث شده بسیاری از والدین و سیاستگذاران از محدودیت استفاده از تلفن همراه در مدارس و ممنوعیت شبکههای اجتماعی برای افراد زیر ۱۶ سال حمایت کنند. اما اودجرز معتقد است که بحران سلامت روان نوجوانان پدیده…
👍2🙏1
به آرامش میرسی اگر: -به آرامش میرسی اگر هیچکس را برای چیزی که هست و کاری که میکندسرزنش نکنی -به آرامش میرسی اگر آستانه تحملت را بالا ببری و بپذیری که آدمها متفاوتند، و قرار نیست همه باب سلیقهی تو باشند. -به آرامش میرسی اگر بپذیری رفتار دیگران تا وقتی به روان و آرامش تو آسیبی نمیزند، به خودشان مربوط است. -آدمهای امروز آنقدر دغدغه دارند که دیگر حوصلهای برای دخالت و قضاوت و سرزنش ندارند. -آدمها خودشان مسئول…
👍2👏1
و امیدوارم آفتاب امروز روشنی بباره به دل و قلبت و آغازِ قشنگ ترین لحظه ها باشه برات...🌱💚
❤4🥰1🙏1
و نوروساینس میگه یکی از بدترین کارها برای رسیدن به هدفتون... 👆🏼
👍3
و هیچچیز به اندازه چت کردن قاتل یک رابطه نیست. پر از سوءتفاهم، سوءبرداشت پر از قضاوت اشتباه و نقص. هر چه بیشتر بخشی از رابطه توی چت کردن سپری بشه امکان تنش و آشفتگی توی اون رابطه بیشتره. آدمهای بالغ برای رابطه وقت میذارن و صحبت میکنند. ✍ کاتسوموتو
👏3👍1
حافظهی خوب حافظهای است که بداند چگونه امور بیاهميت را فراموش کند. ⚜️کليفتون فاديمن
❤3💯1
در این روزهای سخت زندگی در این برهوت بیمهریها یک لبخند به لب کسی نشوندن بزرگترین هنر دنیاست... امروز شما هنرمند باشید دوست خوبم🌱💚 امروز لبخند فراموش نشه😊 روزتـون شـاد و پـر آرامش🥰🌱💚
❤3🤗1🥰1
خدایا داننده تویی...🌱
❤4
عالم همه یک نقطه ای از نونِ حسین است عشق است چنین جاذبه در خونِ حسین است هرگز نشود مشعلِ این واقعه خاموش تا روی جهان صورتِ گلگونِ حسین است! 🏴فرا رسیدن اربعین حسینی تسلیت باد 🖤
❤2🕊1
گفت: چه زمانی همدیگر را خواهیم دید؟ گفتم: بعد از یک سال، بعد از جنگ گفت: جنگ کی تمام خواهد شد؟ گفتم: همان وقتی که تو را ببینم ...! 👤محمود درویش
❤3💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bargesabzeravan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“برگ سبز روان” (@bargesabzeravan), 2,085 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bargesabzeravan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.