Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ФЦ БАС

Channel

ФЦ БАС

@bas_centr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

953subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002451281869
TypeChannel
Username@bas_centr
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bas_centr

Growth

942953947.56 August 2026 — 942 subscribers6 August 2026 — 942 subscribers7 August 2026 — 943 subscribers14 August 2026 — 947 subscribers29 August 2026 — 953 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 940–955 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 13:26953+6
14 Aug 2026, 16:55947+4
7 Aug 2026, 05:54943+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:50942no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:30942first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.3%
avg views ÷ 953 subscribers
Avg views / post
241
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,206
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3529.2%
2924.2%
👍2823.3%
💯1613.3%
🤩86.67%
🏆32.50%
🤔10.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC155 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда беспилотник выполняет задачи в городе, на производстве, в сельском хозяйстве или при мониторинге инфраструктуры, от точности его работы зависят качество данных и безопасность полета. Именно поэтому развитие отрасли начинается с единых требований и надежных технологий. 📄 С 15 августа 2026 года вступает в силу ГОСТ Р 72684–2026, устанавливающий требования к базовым локальным контрольно-корректирующим станциям ре

👍31💯1

5 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC208 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @blogsobyaninPhoto

Как ИИ меняет московскую промышленность Продолжаю серию постов о цифровой трансформации Москвы. Если раньше мы говорили о стройках и медицине, то сегодня пришло время обсудить наши заводы и производства. Главным полигоном для внедрения инноваций стала особая экономическая зона «Технополис Москва». Здесь более 240 высокотехнологичных компаний используют искусственный интеллект, чтобы автоматизировать процессы, повыш

1👍1💯1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC266 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Телеканал НТВ рассказал, как применяются роботизированные системы в разных отраслях. Почему у них высокий потенциал и в чем заключается выгода использования роботов для бизнеса и государства? В сюжете генеральный директор Федерального центра беспилотных авиационных систем Максим Авдеев подчеркнул, что Россия обладает существенным потенциалом для разработок, развития и внедрения новейших технологий в разные сферы. ▶

🔥105🏆3💯3🤩3

4 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC274 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как внедрить 82 роботизированных устройства без остановки склада? Зачем грузовому беспилотнику надувное крыло? И как безэкипажный катер провел спасательную операцию в открытом море? В июньском выпуске «Беспилотной правды» собрали главные новости о беспилотных и роботизированных системах в России и мире. Что происходит на складах, под землей, в море и на орбите, читайте в новом дайджесте ФЦ БАС 👈 💌 в МАКС | ВК #ФЦ

🔥94👍3

3 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC303 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ФЦ БАС проверяет новые технологии, которые в дальнейшем могут применяться по всей стране. Одно из таких направлений - доставка грузов с помощью беспилотников. В начале года ФЦ БАС провел комплексный отбор решений по доставке грузов в Конаково. В нем участвовали 24 компании. Результаты испытаний легли в основу нескольких пилотных проектов. ➡️ Ленинградская область: доставка товаров последней мили ФЦ БАС совместно с

👍96💯6

31 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC409 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

За последние месяцы в сфере БАС принят ряд важных решений, которые создают более понятные правила для производителей, разработчиков и эксплуатантов. ✈️ Внесены изменения в Воздушный кодекс РФ Вводится обязательная сертификация производителей наземного оборудования для управления БАС, уточняется порядок выдачи сертификатов летной годности, а для отдельных категорий БВС упрощаются процедуры контроля при разработке и п

👍43💯2

30 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC355 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

После публикации итогов Рейтинга дронификации 2026 эксперты ФЦ БАС провели встречу с регионами, на которой подробно разобрали результаты, ответили на вопросы и объяснили, как рассчитывался рейтинг, какие показатели учитывались при оценке и что важно учесть при подготовке следующей отчетности. 🫣 По сравнению с прошлым годом оценка сместила акцент с потенциала использования БАС в регионе на фактическую результативност

👍3💯3🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC310 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Беспилотные системы помогают решать важные задачи в сельском хозяйстве, строительстве, доставке и экологии. Но иногда им находят совсем необычное применение. В карточках собрали семь таких примеров с участием БАС и роботизированных систем 👆 💌 в МАКС | ВК #ФЦБАС #БАС #БРС

6🔥6🤩5

28 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC443 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Что объединяет регионы, вошедшие в число лидеров Национального рейтинга дронификации? Не количество беспилотников и не число реализованных проектов. Лидерами становятся регионы, где беспилотные авиационные системы регулярно используются для выполнения практических задач. ▶️По итогам исследования за 2025 год учтено более 120 сценариев применения БАС. Их совокупный денежный результат составил 10,7 млрд рублей. Более

🔥6👍53🤔1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bas_centr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 79,899 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФЦ БАС” (@bas_centr), 953 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bas_centr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.