Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for дазай читер

Channel

дазай читер

@batatchiter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

495subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002248312918
TypeChannel
Username@batatchiter
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/batatchiter

Growth

488499493.57 August 2026 — 490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 490 subscribers14 August 2026 — 488 subscribers22 August 2026 — 499 subscribers30 August 2026 — 495 subscribers4957 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 24 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 486–501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 20:34495-4
22 Aug 2026, 20:06499+11
14 Aug 2026, 23:54488-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:17490no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:03490first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

353 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13939.4%
🔥8323.5%
custom 54562374181663633155415.3%
custom 5368571474888116996318.78%
🥰318.78%
❤‍🔥71.98%
🍓51.42%
custom 538649202836218775620.567%
🕊10.283%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @batatchiter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC61 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberryPhoto

Батат в тазике. Зачем он там..

14🍓3

31 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC79 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberryPhoto

🤩かごめかごめ🤩 #art

🔥10🥰62

26 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC139 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberryPhoto

⭐Here comes the sun ⭐ #art #батат

custom 545623741816636331514custom 53685714748881169963custom 53864920283621877562

7 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC291 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberry

В молодости когда Мори ещё был подпольным врачом, а Фукудзава его телохранителем, Огай показывал ему удивительную ловкость рук взятием крови из собственной переферийной вены, придерживая жгут зубами... Он эээ типо пытался флиртовать #хэд

24

2 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC355 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberryVideo

Я перевыложу чтоб вы на расслаблялись и плакали #батат

16🔥7🥰5🕊1

1 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC368 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я конечно тут не активлю, но хочу сообщить что ВОЗМОЖНООО буду я сдала госы на 4 и диплом на 5! теперь я свободный человек, нужно только работать, но больше никакой учебы 😻😻😻😻😻

custom 545623741816636331524

27 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTC309 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberryPhoto

Мой самурай сегодня в темницe Мой самурай черные ресницы #art

🔥15

23 Jun 2026, 14:08 UTC354 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberryPhoto

✨✨✨ #art

20

20 Jun 2026, 15:54 UTC290 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kotori4kaPhoto

это батат маленький хорошенький батат бататович #арт

🥰2015🔥8

3 Jun 2026, 13:24 UTC478 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shepardaslairPhoto

С днём рождения, моя любимка Пусть у тебя всё будет красиво, дорого, богато и любимо

13

3 Jun 2026, 04:53 UTC364 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gingiberryPhoto

Сегодня поздравляем с др бататовую маму @dazaichiter без нее не было бы и половину контента который тут появляется Счастья здоровья и прикольчиков. Батат принес тебе чизкейк и хорошее настроение, и три миллиона листиков

custom 545623741816636331516

1 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC376 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bsd_stormPhoto

`` Дазай тот ещё фрик — Иногда надеваю твой чокер как браслет под мои бинты, чтобы он перетянул мне руку и оставил след *чешет* "чешет* tags: #dazai #chuuya #soukoku cr: lewisdeklein https://www.tumblr.com/lewisdeklein/812772821028765696/im-noticing-a-pattern-of-dazai-being-a-weird?source=share

8❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @batatchiter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 597,844 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дазай читер” (@batatchiter), 495 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/batatchiter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.