Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Batjоkes confession [🦇 × 🃏]

Channel

Batjоkes confession [🦇 × 🃏]

@batjokes_cf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

353subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002106805014
TypeChannel
Username@batjokes_cf
Created31 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/batjokes_cf

Growth

332353342.56 August 2026 — 332 subscribers6 August 2026 — 332 subscribers14 August 2026 — 335 subscribers21 August 2026 — 334 subscribers28 August 2026 — 341 subscribers4 September 2026 — 353 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 28 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 329–356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 07:00353+12
28 Aug 2026, 09:33341+7
21 Aug 2026, 01:52334-1
14 Aug 2026, 21:13335+3
6 Aug 2026, 21:46332no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:31332first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

392 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13835.2%
custom 53979779262579084028922.7%
❤‍🔥5514.0%
custom 54002127566558044135413.8%
💘348.67%
92.30%
🤯51.28%
🌭30.765%
🐳20.51%
🍓10.255%
💔10.255%
😭10.255%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 392 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC69 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я снова пришла показать вам свои модельки бэтджоксов ᕙ⁠(⁠@⁠°⁠▽⁠°⁠@⁠)⁠ᕗ #тейк #телтейл ::ого

14custom 53979779262579084025❤‍🔥31💘1custom 54002127566558044131

5 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC154 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

:: какие комиксы вы бы добавили в наш список?

9

5 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC171 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я не так давно пытаюсь зашарить за DC и мне очень нравятся Бэтджоукс(любитель токсик яоя)щас мультсериалы смотрю ,но с комиксами очень тяжко приходится было бы славно если бы кто-то скинул все комиксы с ними которые каноными считаются вообще схаваю по ним любое 🥹🥹 #тейк

custom 5397977926257908402166💘6

3 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC192 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📱cr: Chomiffou #адмтейк #арт

💘25custom 53979779262579084029❤‍🔥6custom 5400212756655804413311

3 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC205 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Несколько раз в комментариях натыкалась на людей, которым нравится флешпоинт бэтджоки, а значит их знают Мне нужно вдохновение для ролок, поэтому спрашиваю просто из интереса. Реакция Марты на то, что в другой вселенной Джокер - мужчина, уже известна (она с этого поржала). Так вот, как вы думаете, если бы наш Джокер узнал, что в альтернативной реальности мать Бэтса - местный Джокер, да ещё и замужем за своим Бэтмено

15custom 53979779262579084025custom 54002127566558044134❤‍🔥21

3 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC189 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Многим очень нравится Лего Бэтмен и Джокер. Они и вправду очень прикольные, чаще всего мне вспоминаются именно они, но что конкретно людей в них цепляет? И какого черта люди, которым не нравятся бэтджоки упоминают лего как адекватных и единственных нормальных бэтджоков? Этож бред /безнег #тейк

22custom 54002127566558044137custom 53979779262579084025❤‍🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC198 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Превет конфа, из какой вселенной бэтжокушки ваш личный фаворит?? #тейк

11custom 53979779262579084026custom 54002127566558044132

31 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC284 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 5397977926257908402176custom 540021275665580441341

29 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC343 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#тейк #арт

custom 54002127566558044132313custom 53979779262579084027🤯52🐳2💔1💘1

29 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC314 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

очень люблю сюжеты, где Джокер всячески манипулирует Бэтменом с помощью своего бедного несчастного образа в его глазах. говорит, что готов на исправление, хочет вернуть жизнь в нормальное русло, приближается ближе некуда и с нежной одержимостью бьёт ножом в сердце. кажется, что песня им подходит. #тейк #хэдканон #музыка

21custom 53979779262579084027🌭3custom 54002127566558044131

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @batjokes_cf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Batjоkes confession [🦇 × 🃏]” (@batjokes_cf), 353 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/batjokes_cf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.