Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 41 days, net -481. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,556–10,181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:01
9,628
-34
13 Sept 2026, 18:57
9,662
-48
9 Sept 2026, 15:36
9,710
-61
4 Sept 2026, 02:54
9,771
-30
1 Sept 2026, 03:13
9,801
-67
29 Aug 2026, 04:04
9,868
-44
25 Aug 2026, 17:36
9,912
-43
22 Aug 2026, 13:59
9,955
-40
19 Aug 2026, 13:23
9,995
-7
18 Aug 2026, 11:47
10,002
-5
17 Aug 2026, 11:02
10,007
-24
15 Aug 2026, 19:12
10,031
-22
14 Aug 2026, 06:58
10,053
-5
12 Aug 2026, 23:58
10,058
-13
11 Aug 2026, 21:56
10,071
-24
10 Aug 2026, 20:52
10,095
-2
9 Aug 2026, 17:41
10,097
-10
8 Aug 2026, 14:46
10,107
-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:35
10,109
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:00
10,109
first reading
Engagement
87 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 9,628 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 87 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
87 (31 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
19,839
Reactions total
371
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21m 36s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,344 reactions across 86 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
382
28.4%
👍
301
22.4%
😁
191
14.2%
⚡
118
8.78%
❤🔥
71
5.28%
👀
59
4.39%
🤣
49
3.65%
😱
30
2.23%
👏
25
1.86%
👎
24
1.79%
💩
22
1.64%
✍
16
1.19%
🙏
13
0.967%
💯
10
0.744%
🤯
10
0.744%
😈
6
0.446%
🤩
5
0.372%
💋
3
0.223%
🤔
3
0.223%
👌
2
0.149%
4 further kinds
4
0.298%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,344 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👑 Скилловых игроков больше не забанить массовыми репортами
🛑Ранее системы защиты автоматически реагировали на массовые жалобы и выдавали временную блокировку, чтобы команда безопасности вручную могла проверить наличие читов или чит-устройств
🛑Теперь если игрок ловит слишком много жалоб, но не триггерит механизмы защиты античита, а также несколько раз подряд успешно проходит ручные проверки — он признаётся ветераном…
⚠️ Теперь о мелких нарушениях будут сначала предупреждать прямо в игре
🛑Ранее предупреждения приходили письмом на почту, игроки могли не заметить их, спустя несколько нарушений они ловили блокировку аккаунта
🛑Теперь мелкие нарушения вроде оскорблений в чате или злоупотребления эксплойтами будут приводить к внутриигровым предупреждениям, чтобы у игроков был шанс исправить свое поведение и не отлететь в бан
💬 Чат • …
🔥 Режимы ТОП ГАН продлили до конца 4 сезона
Игрокам настолько понравились режимы, что разработчики решили продлить их до конца сезона
Также анонсировали улучшенную версию Carrier Strike в 6 сезоне
💬 Чат • Поиск команды
🐘 BF News • 🟣 Loading…
🔥 Стим пополнение теперь стало выгодным, рабочим и удобным!
Сделали для всех комиссию 10% ⚡️ (независимо от суммы) — ого, такое бывает. Моментальная доставка, выгодные цены, никакого обмана, и все это - Donatov.net.
С помощью Donatov.net ты можешь пополнить свой аккаунт в Steam дешевле других сервисов
🏢 Античит Javelin будет доступен с первого дня на RTX Spark
EA тесно работают с Nvidia и планируют выпустить свой античит для их ПК, что позволит обладателям таковых играть в последние вышедшие части Battlefield
Что такое RTX Spark?
• По сути суперчип, объединяющий в себе центральный и графический процессоры — создан специально для ультратонких ноутбуков
• Позволяет локально запускать ИИ модели, а также работать с…
🔫Невышедшие пушки из файлов игры после S4
Также оружие из Sci-Fi тайтла EA может появиться в игре как подбираемое оружие 👀
Источник: temporyal
💬 Чат • Поиск команды
🐘 BF News • 🟣 Loading…
🚨 Запретные зоны теперь спавнятся в рандомных местах на карте
Похоже баг связан с новым механизмом против спавн-кемпинга техники, но порой эти зоны возникают вообще в немыслимых местах карты
💬 Чат • Поиск команды
🐘 BF News • 🟣 Loading…
😂 Напишите IQ автора клипа
💬 Чат • Поиск команды
🐘 BF News • 🟣 Loading…
🤣24😁13
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @battlefield_kh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Battlefield 6 • Баттлфилд 6” (@battlefield_kh), 9,628 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/battlefield_kh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.