Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BRFF INSIDE

Channel

BRFF INSIDE

@bazihkinoff

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,562subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001966024262
TypeChannel
Username@bazihkinoff
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bazihkinoff

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,5621,5891,575.57 August 2026 — 1,589 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,585 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,585 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,581 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,574 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,573 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,570 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,572 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,568 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,562 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 28 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,558–1,593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 08:561,562-6
1 Sept 2026, 05:471,568-4
29 Aug 2026, 12:231,572+2
26 Aug 2026, 19:451,570-3
24 Aug 2026, 02:181,573-1
20 Aug 2026, 16:461,574-2
17 Aug 2026, 22:251,576-5
14 Aug 2026, 13:251,581-2
10 Aug 2026, 21:361,583-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,585no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:541,585-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:231,589first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 46s
Average length
4m 23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6634.4%
custom 53437410878339332546332.8%
💋2412.5%
😁157.81%
custom 5418385514904440280147.29%
🔥63.13%
👎42.08%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC198 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📹// #упоминание #JuliusSpeak • Упоминание Вовы в реакции Юлика и Кузьмы на видео MILKI MAKER - Самые Тупые Стримеры • Юлик и Кузьма обсуждают лысину Вовы и про то, что стримить тяжело. 0:00 - Про лысину Вовы 3:41 - Про то, что стримить больше 2 часов тяжело 4:57 - Про лысину Вовы 7:05 - Отличная форма черепа ★ @bazihkinoff ★

🔥6custom 53437410878339332541

Signed damn 🤫

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC170 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetgg

Значит так. Вчера я устроил пиздец в скваде и набрал витуб детей. Теперь можете тыкать на эту ссылку и смотреть на весь этот пиздец. Один хуй сквад простаивал Отборные фрикухи с разным характером. Вот это настоящий фрикленд. https://www.twitch.tv/team/89squad

6custom 53437410878339332542

Signed шеф вафля¹²

7 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC315 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @theesonyaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁15💋5

Signed Та🫠

5 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC397 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📹// #упоминание #papapaver • Упоминание Вовы на стриме Раши Павера • Павер высказался про лысину Вовы, сказав, что волосы вырастут и будут красивыми. ★ @bazihkinoff ★

14custom 53437410878339332548

Signed damn 🤫

5 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC248 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetgg

Точно, как домой доеду. Заведу на втором. Всем спс кто сегодня смотрел. Для меня важно было, что вы сегодня это смотрели. Стрим от третьего лица тачки была моя самая яркая идея. Видосы давно есть, а вот стрима… не было.

💋2custom 53437410878339332541

Signed шеф вафля¹²

5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC241 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetgg

Все разрядилось. Стрим переподрубать уже не буду (не смогу). Кто бы что не говорил, но я обещал - сделал. Щас будем думать че делать с сетью, чтобы в следующий раз было ещё лучше. Пишите здесь что добавить, или наоборот убавить. Про лаги не писать, это уже само собой. В целом как вам вайб? Стоит ли дальше развивать такое, или дропнуть на хуй проще. Потому что это нихуя не дёшево.

💋2

Signed шеф вафля¹²

5 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC379 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @disimondiVideo

Закрывайте Твич - лучше уже не будет 😎 Наши ребята - пушка, бимба, имба 🩷

12💋1

Signed шеф вафля¹²

5 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC249 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetggVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53437410878339332542💋1

Signed damn 🤫

5 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC216 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetggPhoto

Нихуя себе электричка

custom 53437410878339332544💋1

Signed шеф вафля¹²

5 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC211 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetggVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53437410878339332542💋1

Signed шеф вафля¹²

5 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC221 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetggVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53437410878339332547💋1

Signed Та🫠

2 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC270 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nebudetggVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53437410878339332547💋2

Signed шеф вафля¹²

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bazihkinoff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LAGODA1337
@lagoda1337 · 84,980
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
YEP
@yep_news · 187,933
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
NELYARAY
@nraykus · 33,853
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BRFF INSIDE” (@bazihkinoff), 1,562 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bazihkinoff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.