Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بازی مامانساز

Channel

بازی مامانساز

@bazimamansaz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,818subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001674757875
TypeChannel
Username@bazimamansaz
Descriptionدانشجوی علوم تربیتی گرایش ابتدایی و پیش دبستان 👩‍🎓 تسهیلگر کودک با سابقه ۶ سال فعالیت در حوزه بازی ارتباط 👇 @Mamy_twins انتشار تصاویر و ویدئوها و متون به دلیل صرف وقت، در کانالها ممنوع و اشکال شرعی دارد کانال روبیکا Rubika.ir/bazimamansaz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bazimamansaz

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7096,8526,780.57 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,765 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,747 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,740 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,739 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,738 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,734 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,732 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,715 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,717 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,709 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,818 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,852 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,838 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,837 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,834 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,828 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,814 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,812 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,829 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,823 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,818 subscribers6,8187 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,688–6,873 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 23:506,818-5
2 Nov 2026, 09:176,823-6
27 Oct 2026, 08:566,829+17
24 Oct 2026, 15:106,812-2
21 Oct 2026, 16:576,814-14
18 Oct 2026, 09:366,828-6
14 Oct 2026, 23:206,834-3
11 Oct 2026, 15:176,837-1
5 Oct 2026, 14:356,838-14
27 Sept 2026, 15:596,852+34
18 Sept 2026, 03:196,818+109
14 Sept 2026, 04:396,709-8
10 Sept 2026, 09:156,717+2
4 Sept 2026, 22:566,715-17
1 Sept 2026, 07:446,732-2
29 Aug 2026, 03:576,734-4
26 Aug 2026, 08:266,738-1
23 Aug 2026, 18:536,739-1
20 Aug 2026, 02:466,740-7
17 Aug 2026, 11:536,747first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.24%
avg views ÷ 6,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
425
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
47
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held105 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total19,998
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 12:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,470
Videos
≈484
Links
≈212

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 47 posts held from the last 30 days (10.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC134 viewsread 6 November 2026

🔰حالا بیا این تمرین انجام بده سه وسیله با شکل‌های متفاوت مثل دایره، مربع و مثلث به فرزندت نشون بده. ازش بخواه اسم شکل‌ها رو بگه. حالا شکل‌ها رو پنهان کن و ازش بخواه در وسایل خونه نمونه‌ای از هر شکل پیدا کنه. اگر بتونه مفهوم شکل‌ها رو در محیط جدید تشخیص بده، نشونه‌ای از درک و انتقال یادگیریه مامان جان این تمرین مناسب برای هوش فضایی هست بازی مامانساز @bazimamansaz

Signed Mamy Twins

6 Nov 2026, 06:51 UTC140 viewsread 6 November 2026

۱) فقط با دیدن نمونه میتونه جواب بده. 👈مثلاً کودک یک الگوی عددی رو یاد گرفته و دقیقاً همون رو تکرار می‌کنه؛ اما وقتی ترتیب اعداد تغییر میکنه، نمی‌تونه الگوی جدید رو ادامه بده. یعنی ممکنه روش انجام کار رو حفظ کرده باشه، نه منطق پشت اون رو. ۲) نمیتونه آموخته‌هاش رو در موقعیت جدید استفاده کنه. مثلاً اسم شکل‌ها رو بلده، اما وقتی ازش میخوای در محیط اطراف یک شکل مشابه پیدا کنه، به سختی میتونه ارتباط برقرار کنه. بازی م…

Signed Mamy Twins

6 Nov 2026, 06:47 UTC117 viewsread 6 November 2026

حفظ کردن و یادگیری مفهومی دو چیز متفاوتن. مثلاً کودک ممکنه بدونه: ۲ + ۳ = ۵ اما آیا می‌دونه چرا جواب ۵ میشه؟ یادگیری مفهومی یعنی کودک بتونه آموخته‌هاش رو در موقعیت‌های جدید هم به کار ببره، نه اینکه فقط پاسخ آشنای قبلی رو تکرار کنه.

Signed Mamy Twins

6 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC168 viewsread 6 November 2026

اگر فرزندت تمام عددها رو بلد باشه، یعنی مفهوم عدد رو هم یاد گرفته؟ اگر بتونه یک الگو رو عیناً تکرار کنه، یعنی خودش هم می‌تونه الگوی جدید بسازه؟ گاهی بچه‌ها چیزی رو درست انجام میدن، اما هنوز مفهوم پشت اون رو درک نکردن! 🔰امروز می‌خوام یک کار کوچیک بهت یاد بدم که این تفاوت رو ببینی

Signed Mamy Twins

4 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC367 viewsread 6 November 2026

من دوست دارم اینجا فقط ایده‌ی فعالیت و سرگرمی بهتون ندم دلم می‌خواد با هم یاد بگیریم پشت هر فعالیت ساده، چه مهارت‌هایی در حال رشد هستن. 🔗چون وقتی بدونیم داریم چه مهارتی رو پرورش میدیم، انتخاب فعالیت‌هامون هم هدفمندتر میشه💪🧠

Signed Mamy Twins

4 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC350 viewsread 6 November 2026

حالا یک آزمایش کوچیک با کودکتون انجام بدین . چهار وسیله‌ی ساده جلوی کودک بذارین. ۲۰ ثانیه فرصت بدین با دقت نگاه کنه. بعد وسایل رو بپوشونین و ازش بخواین هر چیزی رو که به خاطر داره نام ببره. این فعالیت ساده فرصتی برای مشاهده و تقویت حافظه‌ی دیداری و توجه فراهم می‌کنه.

Signed Mamy Twins

4 Nov 2026, 07:06 UTC362 viewsread 6 November 2026

مثلاً تصور کنین کودک قراره یک کلمه رو بخونه. برای این کار باااااید بتونه: ۱. به نشونه‌ها توجه کنه. ۲. شکل نشونه‌ها رو از هم تشخیص بده. ۳. اطلاعاتی رو که می‌بینه در ذهنش نگه داره. ۴. ترتیب نشونه‌ها رو دنبال کنه. ۵. صداها رو با هم ترکیب کنه. دوستان در مدرسه روش این موارد به کودک آموزش نمیدنا اون توانایی کودکه(اون زیر بنای یادگیریشه) که زود یا دیرتر یاد بگیره می‌بینین؟ پشت یک کار به‌ظاهر ساده، چندین مهارت شناختی با…

Signed Mamy Twins

4 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC304 viewsread 6 November 2026

من این موضوع رو فقط از روی اطلاعات و مطالب آموزشی نمی‌گم تجربه‌ی زندگی خودم هم پشت این حرف‌ها مادرای عزیز از حدود ۵ سال قبل از ورود دختر و پسرم به مدرسه، روی مهارت‌های زیربنایی یادگیریشون به‌صورت هدفمند و آگاهانه کار کردم کسانی که از اول کانال بازی مامانساز دنبال کردند کاملا میدونن 😊✌️ نه با عجله برای آموزش کتاب‌های مدرسه، نه با فشار برای جلو انداختنشون از هم‌سن‌وسال‌هاشون بلکه با تمرکز روی مهارت‌هایی که می‌دونستم …

Signed Mamy Twins

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @bazimamansaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @bazimamansaz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Oct 2026, 12:00 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

به نظرتون بازی چقدر باید در یادگیری بچه‌های دبستانی نقش داشته باشه

  1. زیاد،بازی خودش یک روش یادگیریه69%
  2. بستگی به نوع بازی و هدف آموزشی داره31%
  3. دقیق نمیدونم4%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حمید کثیری
@hamidkasiri_ir · 33,054
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
قصه و لالایی مادرانه
@ghesse_lalaii · 44,244
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
بهترین مادر دنیا شادترین کودک
@BehtarinMadareDonya · 102,431
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
آشپزی حرفه ای کدبانو
@kadbaanooo · 21,214
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 September 2026
ایده های فانتزی 💒
@khaneyeidea · 21,282
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 September 2026
استخدام روانشناسان و مشاوران
@estekhdam_psy · 22,403
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بازی مامانساز” (@bazimamansaz), 6,818 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bazimamansaz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.