23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,426–16,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 07:07
16,436
-6
29 Aug 2026, 08:16
16,442
-2
28 Aug 2026, 09:48
16,444
+2
27 Aug 2026, 09:05
16,442
-1
26 Aug 2026, 06:33
16,443
-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:14
16,447
+1
24 Aug 2026, 03:12
16,446
-2
22 Aug 2026, 12:52
16,448
-1
21 Aug 2026, 00:04
16,449
+4
19 Aug 2026, 23:58
16,445
+1
18 Aug 2026, 01:32
16,444
-7
16 Aug 2026, 21:57
16,451
-10
15 Aug 2026, 17:14
16,461
+1
14 Aug 2026, 05:35
16,460
-4
12 Aug 2026, 23:23
16,464
-5
12 Aug 2026, 01:52
16,469
-10
11 Aug 2026, 03:36
16,479
-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:18
16,482
-6
9 Aug 2026, 06:42
16,488
-5
8 Aug 2026, 08:42
16,493
first reading
Engagement
110 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.4%
avg views ÷ 16,436 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,130
101 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.914%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
101
of 110 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
110 (29 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
720,230
Reactions total
6,582
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,790
Videos
≈1,230
Links
≈6,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
31m 35s
Average length
2m 52s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,089 reactions across 106 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,413
34.0%
👎
2,327
32.8%
❤
1,621
22.9%
👏
619
8.73%
🔥
52
0.734%
🙏
31
0.437%
🥰
10
0.141%
👌
6
0.085%
💯
5
0.071%
🕊
5
0.071%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ «ایران قوی» از آرامش کارگر و سفره بازنشسته میگذرد
🔻از همین منظر، شنیدن صدای نمایندگان قانونی کارگران و بازنشستگان و استفاده از ظرفیت تشکلهای صنفی میتواند به تصمیمگیریهای دقیقتر کمک کند.
⤵️⤵️⤵️
asrkhabar.com/?p=800943
•┈•┈✾🌐✾┈•┈•
🆔کانال خبری ویژه بازنشستگان تامین
اجتماعی (بازتاب)
📎https://eitaa.com/supply2016
✨ تجلی رحمت و تبلور علم
در روزی که زمین و زمان به استقبال ولادت «رحمت للعالمین»، حضرت محمد مصطفی (ص) و «سلطان العلوم»، امام جعفر صادق (ع) میروند، قلبها به امید تجدید پیمان با حقیقت میتپد.
یکی آمد تا تاریکیهای جهل را با نور «وحدت و مهر» بشکند و دومی آمد تا با تبیین «دانش و حکمت»، راه نجات را برای بشریت روشن کند.
ولادت این دو گوهر درشت، یادآور این است که مسیر تعالی انسان، از گذرگاه «اخلاق محمدی» و «اندیشه صاد…
شاید روزی که شما از سازمان تأمین اجتماعی رفتید، مهمترین قضاوت درباره عملکردتان این نباشد که چند بخشنامه صادر کردید یا چند مدیر منصوب کردید؛ بلکه این باشد که:
آیا در دوران شما، آدمها جرأت داشتند با نام خودشان حرف بزنند؟
امیدوارم پاسخ آن روز، «آری» باشد.
با احترام
مهدی اسفندیار
کانال «نه به عوامفریبی»
•┈•┈✾🌐✾┈•┈•
🆔کانال خبری ویژه بازنشستگان تامین
اجتماعی (بازتاب)
📎https://eitaa.com/supply2016
نامهای به سرپرست سازمان تأمین اجتماعی
جناب آقای محمدی
سرپرست محترم سازمان تأمین اجتماعی
با سلام و تقدیم احترام
موضوع: اتمسفر سازمان تأمین اجتماعی و فعالان اجتماعی
جناب آقای محمدی،
در سازمان تأمین اجتماعی، طی دو سال اخیر در دوران آقای سالاری و پیش از آن در دوران آقای موسوی، به گمان من اتفاقی میمون رخ داد و آن، سعهصدر در شنیدن صدای انتقاد بود.
هر دو مدیرعامل، در مقاطعی تحت شدیدترین نقدها و مخالفتها قرار گرفتند…
♦️ خلاصه پیام رهبر معظم انقلاب به مناسبت هفته دولت ۱۴۰۵/۰۶/۰۶
•┈•┈✾🌐✾┈•┈•
🆔کانال خبری ویژه بازنشستگان تامین
اجتماعی (بازتاب)
📎https://eitaa.com/supply2016
🤔 واقعیت کجاست؟ در وزارتخانهها یا در میان بازنشستگان؟
بسیار ارزشمند است که رئیسجمهور برای فاصله گرفتن از «گزارشهای گلخانهای»، سرزده به وزارتخانهها میرود. اما باید پرسید: آیا واقعیتِ زندگی میلیونها بازنشسته و کارگر هم در گزارشهای وزارتخانهها نهفته است؟
تشکلهایی مانند کانون عالی کارگران بازنشسته، جایی هستند که فاصله میان «آمارهای رسمی» و «زندگی واقعی» بهوضوح دیده میشود.
اگر هدف، تعامل واقعی است، بازدی…
✅ بازدیدهای سرزده، اما نه برای بازنشستگان و کارگران! / چرا رئیسجمهور به قلب مطالبات نمیرود؟
⭕️ سؤال اینجاست: چرا رئیسجمهور، همانطور که سرزده به وزارتخانهها میرود، یکبار هم بیخبر به میان این تشکلها نمیرود؟
⤵️⤵️⤵️
asrkhabar.com/?p=800373
•┈•┈✾🌐✾┈•┈•
🆔کانال خبری ویژه بازنشستگان تامین
اجتماعی (بازتاب)
📎https://eitaa.com/supply2016
جناب آقای مهدی اسفندیار ارجمند،
استناد شما به کلام وحی و تأکید بر اینکه «سکوت در برابر حقیقت قابل دفاع نیست»، لرزه بر اندام هر مدیری میاندازد که حقیقت را پنهان کرده است.
ما در «رسانه بازتاب»، این نگاه خداترسانه و دلسوزانه شما را تحسین میکنیم و متن شما را به عنوان یک «سند حقیقت» منتشر کردیم تا صدای دلسوزی شما به گوش میلیونها بازنشسته برسد.
سپاس از نگاه بصیر و قلم جسور جناب آقای مهدی اسفندیار
با ارادت؛
✍مصطف…
«وَلا تَلْبِسُوا الْحَقَّ بِالْبَاطِلِ وَتَکْتُمُوا الْحَقَّ وَأَنْتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ»
اگر سکوت امروز من باعث شود فردا بگویم «میدانستم و نگفتم»، آن سکوت برای من قابل دفاع نیست.
من امروز آنچه را میدانم، آنچه را میبینم و آنچه را از سر دلسوزی نسبت به ایران احساس میکنم، مینویسم.
قضاوت با تاریخ.
با نهایت احترام
✍مهدی اسفندیار
کانال نه به عوامفریبی
@nabeavamfaribi
•┈•┈✾🌐✾┈•┈•
🆔کانال خبری ویژه بازنشستگان تامین
اجتماعی …
خداوند از عالمان پیمان گرفته است...
این کلام نه خطاب به وزیر محترم است و نه مدیرعامل محترم سازمان تأمین اجتماعی؛ این کلمات از کُنه نگرانی من برای مملکت، حاکمیت و سرنوشت دهها میلیون ایرانی است.
بسیاری از دوستان نظارتی در حوزه سلامت، سالیان دور است که حقیر را میشناسند و میدانند وقتی دست به قلم میبرم و اینچنین مینگارم، چشمانم پر از اشک و سینهام مالامال درد است.
رفتن آقای سالاری، موضوعی کاملاً شخصی و در چارچوب ح…
📜 یادداشتی در باب تعامل و تحول در سازمان تأمین اجتماعی
با آغاز دوره جدید مدیریت سازمان تامین اجتماعی و تأکید دکتر محمدی بر رویکردهای تحولی، انتظار داریم این تعهدات در عرصه عمل، بهویژه در ارتباط با تشکلهای صنفی، تجلی یابد.
سازمان تامین اجتماعی با جامعهای گسترده روبهرو است و در این میان، کانون عالی با نمایندگی بیش از ۵ میلیون نفر، جایگاهی کمنظیر دارد. مطالبات این کانون، صرفاً مطالبات یک تشکل نیست، بلکه باز…
📡 رسانه بازتاب؛ صدای متحد بازنشستگان تأمین اجتماعی کشور
ما در تمامی پلتفرمها در کنار شما هستیم:
🔹 ایتا:
🔗 https://eitaa.com/supply2016
🔹 روبیکا:
🔗 https://rubika.ir/kanalbaztb2016
🔹 تلگرام:
🔗 https://t.me/baztab2016
✨ بازتاب؛ پل ارتباطی و بازوی رسانهای جامعه بازنشستگی
•┈•┈✾🌐✾┈•┈•
🆔کانال خبری ویژه بازنشستگان تامین
اجتماعی (بازتاب)
📎https://eitaa.com/supply2016
❤20👍3👎2👌1
Signed مصطفی آراسته مهر
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @baztab2016. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 488,063 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
شبکه خبری بازنشستگان @bazneshasteganirani · 84,600 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
پزشك سلامت 💚 @dr_Health · 39,903 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
کانال زرین قانون کارایران @ghanonkar2 · 63,357 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌏بازتاب🌏” (@baztab2016), 16,436 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baztab2016.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.