BITBONK Official pinned a photo

Channel
BITBONK Official
@bbonkofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,198subscribers
-331 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002204943763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bbonkofficial |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bbonkofficial |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 6,198 | -42 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 6,240 | -26 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 6,266 | -43 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 6,309 | -41 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:04 | 6,350 | -26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 6,376 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 6,398 | -26 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 6,424 | -33 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 6,457 | -18 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 6,475 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 6,495 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 6,513 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 6,525 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 6,529 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 6,529 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
86 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 31 | 36.0% | |
| 👎 | 16 | 18.6% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 10.5% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 8.14% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.98% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 5.81% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.33% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 1.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 14 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Bullish on BITBONK! 🐂🧀 Check out our NFT collection in Opensea and join the movement! https://opensea.io/BITBONK Trade BITBONK in Uniswap🦄 https://app.uniswap.org/explore/tokens/base/0xe31f23df8dcbf35a88191fa08ac0f6daa67e5509 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
👍6👎5💩4❤1
ℹ️BITBONK LISTING UPDATE 📢 Hey BITBONKers! We wanted to share a quick update regarding our CEX listing. While we were aiming to have BITBONK live on a centralized exchange by now, there’s been a slight delay due to some unforeseen factors. We are currently in active negotiations with several centralized exchanges to ensure we find the best fit for our long-term growth. In the meantime, we encourage the community …
💩5👍2
Ride the crypto waves with BITBONK on Base network – smooth sailing ahead! 🛥🌊 Trade BITBONK on Uniswap 🦄🦄 https://app.uniswap.org/explore/tokens/base/0xe31f23df8dcbf35a88191fa08ac0f6daa67e5509 Collect our badass NFTs😎😎 https://opensea.io/BITBONK ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
👍2👏1
📢BITBONK IS NOW VERIFIED ON BASESCAN! 🚀 The BITBONK contract is now officially verified on Basescan, bringing even more transparency and trust to the community! 🔥 📢 Check it out on Basescan: https://basescan.org/token/0xe31f23df8dcbf35a88191fa08ac0f6daa67e5509 Buy $BBONK in Uniswap now while it's early! https://app.uniswap.org/explore/tokens/base/0xe31f23df8dcbf35a88191fa08ac0f6daa67e5509 BITBONK is here to stay—…
👍2👎2👏1
BITBONK Official pinned «🚨 BITBONK IS NOW LIVE ON UNISWAP! 🚨 The wait is over! is officially LIVE on Uniswap! 🚀 It’s time to grab your share and be part of the revolution. The future of memecoins has arrived, and it’s looking brighter than ever! 💥»
🔥 BITBONK BURN MECHANISM IS NOW LIVE! 🔥 The flames are lit!🔥 BITBONK now has an active burn mechanism, making every transaction more powerful. This means reduced supply and increased scarcity—fueling the fire for future growth! 🚀 🔥 Why This Matters: 🔥 Deflationary tokenomics—less supply, more value! 🔥 Every burn strengthens the BITBONK ecosystem. 🔥 The community wins as tokens become rarer over time. 🔥21 million as…
🤣9👎4👍3😁3❤2😡1
📣 BITBONK CONTRACT OWNERSHIP RENOUNCED! 🔥 ✔️Proof: https://basescan.org/tx/0x0624e399df21437258343e3ab0509b5ac22309f2bcfbd8f76fc995ca655c3f33 Transparency. Fairness. Community-driven. BITBONK is now 100% decentralized! 🚀 We've officially renounced ownership, meaning no one controls the contract—just like it should be! This is a true memecoin revolution with shades on 😎, built for the people, by the people. 📌 What…
👎3😁3👍1
Video, posted without a caption
🚨 BITBONK IS NOW LIVE ON UNISWAP! 🚨 The wait is over! is officially LIVE on Uniswap! 🚀 It’s time to grab your share and be part of the revolution. The future of memecoins has arrived, and it’s looking brighter than ever! 💥
👍1
BITBONK Official pinned «⌛ 20 MINUTES UNTIL BITBONK LAUNCHES ON UNISWAP! ⏳ Countdown: bitbonk.lol»
⌛ 20 MINUTES UNTIL BITBONK LAUNCHES ON UNISWAP! ⏳ Countdown: bitbonk.lol
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bbonkofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BITBONK Official” (@bbonkofficial), 6,198 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbonkofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.