Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,429–4,509 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 20:36
4,500
+17
9 Sept 2026, 21:55
4,483
+6
4 Sept 2026, 06:17
4,477
-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:06
4,478
+3
25 Aug 2026, 16:34
4,475
+2
19 Aug 2026, 12:37
4,473
-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:36
4,479
+10
12 Aug 2026, 18:06
4,469
+29
9 Aug 2026, 17:43
4,440
+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:09
4,438
-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:03
4,439
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:33
4,439
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
306 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
163
53.3%
🔥
72
23.5%
👍
59
19.3%
🤡
5
1.63%
🤯
4
1.31%
👎
3
0.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bbtkaprklv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я вам задолжала рубрику про книгу месяца в июле. Хотя этот пост не так нужно начинать…
КАК-ТО РАЗ МЕНЯ СПРОСИЛИ, что будет, если ничего из того, что я прочитала за месяц, мне не понравится. И я тогда сказала, что такое случается КРАЙНЕ редко, обычно я уже знаю авторов, которых люблю, или темы, которые мне интересны, поэтому такие ситуации редки, но не равны нулю.
В июле действительно случилось такое, что всё, что я…
✨ Выступаю в жанре хот-тейк и рассказываю в карьерном канале A-teams, что один из главных навыков, который поможет сохранить работу в маркетинге, это умение продолжать знать, как выполнять свои задачи без помощи искусственного интеллекта.
🖤 Стыд!
Говорим про то, почему так хочется провалиться сквозь землю. Вышел новый эпизод нашего подкаста «Гештальт для всех» про стыд.
Я невероятно ждала выход этого эпизода, потому что многие вещи в своей жизни я делала вопреки стыду. Мама все детство просила ее не позорить, а я шла позориться и переживала ощущение собственной неидеальности. Не знаю, можно ли сказать, что вся моя внутренняя смелость родилась в резу…
🔥 Новая лекция про то, во что превратились соцсети в 2026 году (и как идти от контента к контакту).
Сегодня выступала на закрытом клиентском мероприятии SETTERS, про него в постике рассказал Женя, а мне захотелось поделиться слайдами из стратегии и дать несколько выводов, которые звучали на сегодняшней встрече.
Лейтмотив лекции:
Глобально: SMM это среда. У каждого пользователя свой инфопузырь
и нам надо в него прор…
6 вакансий в SETTERS! Что? Да.
Персонально ОЧЕНЬ сильно надеюсь, что этот пост повлияет на то, что мы закроем вакансию New Business Lead, плюс нуждаемся в дизайнерах МОЩНО. На повестке дня мидл медиа дизайнер и дизайнер презентаций.
➡️ Описание всех вакансий лежит по ссылке, там же можно откликнуться и отправить свое CV!
P.s: как раз сейчас сижу в московском офисе, в котором ежедневно думаю о том, как же мне повез…
📚 Про «тренд на чтение» или почему все начали заводить книжные клубы
Сначала маленькая предыстория, даже такой мини-рабочий кейс: года полтора назад я поработала с командой Подписных Изданий (это потрясающая команда и даже короткий опыт взаимодействия с ней оставил у меня массу позитивных воспоминаний) над проектом, который недавно вышел в полный релиз, он называется Книжный Консьерж, это персональный и корпоративны…
💻 Очень большая подборка фильмов и сериалов
В общем, ваш админ канала молчал почти весь июль по причине: случился отпуск, а также случилось 6 перелетов и 25 часов, которые я суммарно провела в небе. В отпуске я отдыхала, позволяла себе скучать и ни о чем не думать, но в самолетах много смотрела кино.
Посмотрев Sentimental Value, я открыла свою заметку, в которую записываю любимые фильмы и сериалы и поняла, что нико…
❤32🔥11👍8
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bbtkaprklv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Связь Вишневского @pokamojno · 24,363 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Библиотека приколов | Анна Ягода” (@bbtkaprklv), 4,500 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbtkaprklv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.