Posted without readable text

Channel
Бородатый арбитраж 🧔
@bearded_cpa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,169subscribers
-78 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001227112384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bearded_cpa |
| Description | Наш HR-канал - https://t.me/hr_cpa_vacancy Автор: @m0pfin |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bearded_cpa |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:25 | 6,169 | +29 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 6,140 | +18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:58 | 6,122 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 6,129 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 6,141 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 6,148 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:10 | 6,157 | -353 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 6,510 | -20 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 6,530 | -9 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 6,539 | +276 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 6,263 | -53 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 6,316 | -25 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 6,341 | +475 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 5,866 | -40 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 5,906 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 5,915 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 5,918 | -54 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 5,972 | -139 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 6,111 | -14 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 6,125 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.7%
- avg views ÷ 6,169 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,770
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (26 December 2025 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,770 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 00:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 149
- Videos
- 59
- Links
- 204
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 6s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
201 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 110 | 54.7% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 13.9% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 6.97% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.99% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.995% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.498% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.498% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 67
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 10
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 63%
- Most on one post
- 51
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bearded_cpa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Абузим Grok Imagine 1.5 бесплатно для крео. Заходим на weavy.ai и проходим регистрацию, нам дают бесплатные кредиты, 150. Нажимаем: - Create new file и попадаем в workflow - Копируем эту ссылку https://fal.ai/models/xai/grok-imagine-video/v1.5/image-to-video и просто вставляем в наш воркфлоу Стоимость одной генерации 10 кредитов, и того мы получаем бесплатные 15 генераций 720p, 15 секунд видео, аудио-сопровождени…
👍7❤2💯1🔥1
О как, мы уже обучили своего AI - агента, заходить в апп сервисы, добавлять пиксели, и оставался лишь барьер ввиде ботов где нужно шарить пиксель руками в бота, теперь Дуров облегчил и это и теперь можно научить бота общаться с другими ботами! А это значит - полностью автоматическая пошарка пикселей для сервисов где нет АПИ (а у 90% сервисов нет АПИ) Сейчас - мы отправляем пиксели в 1 агента, он автоматически шар…
🔥20
🧠 AI devs asked for this — and we delivered. 🤖 Bots can now talk to other bots on Telegram. 💬 Autonomous agents now have a communication layer humans can follow. 🛠 Start building!
Цукер таки сделал ход, который многие пытались накостылить ИИ баерами. Он выкатил официальный MCP для рекламы — то есть теперь AI можно подключать напрямую к рекламному кабинету и работать уже не на уровне “подскажи идею”, а на уровне реальных данных, реальной аналитики и реальных действий. Уже можно подключить Claude Code x Codex (GPT) Передадим антикам и сервисам аналитики "привет"😊 Потому что для MCP подключен…
🔥8❤2😱1
File, posted without a caption
❤7🔥3❤🔥1
Можете закинуть, этот скрипт детектор и проверить свой трекер, на случай есть ли у вас, подмена на уровне NGINX , от всего не защитит, тут лучше смотреть глазами сервер, но однозначно что-то задетектить то что не делает КТ точно поможет. Если зеленый всё ок, но проверить стоит, если красный у вас БИНГО Заливаем на сервер: chmod +x /root/detect.sh /root/detect.sh
❤7🔥5👍3😎1
Минутка кибер-безопасности, ваш тех может быть не только вашим другом) Залетел тут аудитить чужой Keitaro — попросили глянуть, почему в одной кампании трафик начал редиректить на левый домен. История получилась занятная, делюсь, чтобы вы у себя то же самое проверили. Если коротко: их «интегратор» @username, который полгода назад настроил трекер и с тех пор по необходимости заходил на сервер, последние 11 дней споко…
🤯8❤7👍6🔥4❤🔥1
Всем привет, захотелось осветить такую тему как - повсеместное использование ИИ в нашей сфере. А именно не для кого уже не секрет, что многие корпорации делегируют рутину, заменяют целые должности ИИ-агентами. И наша индустрия не стала исключением, автоматизации/кодинг/креатив уже если не на полной основе, но хотя бы на 40% уже делают ИИ-сервисы. И это неплохо, и вот я из всех утюгов, видел весь декабрь/январь это …
👍8❤5🔥2💔1
Новый развод на капче типа "claudflare" просят вставить команду в терминал якобы подтвердить что вы не робот, и ваши пароли со всех браузеров утекут к скамерам, предупредите своих сотрудников, эт что-то новое, бывалые конечно не поведутся на странный мув с терминалом, но вот неокрепшие умы легко проделают сие манипуляцию🥰 Еще вот такую нашел https://filesynccradle.com/s2/?c=ADVomGmYfwUAHIwCAFZOOQASAAAAAADV (только д…
🤯5😎1
@marketing_kari @krrna_pr тут какой-то приколист ходит по крупным конторам предлагает рекламу в каналах, и скамнул несколько кампаний уже. Скорей всего username опять сменится Если что он ни ко мне ни к каналам которые предлагает отношения не имеет, уточняйте у владельцев каналов перед переводом, контакты админов как правило указаны в описании канала 😶
👍1
Ранее не анонсированный модуль аналитики креативов выглядит вот так 😏
🔥10❤2❤🔥1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bearded_cpa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бородатый арбитраж 🧔” (@bearded_cpa), 6,169 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bearded_cpa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.