В 20 ещё вроде бы рано, а в 40 уже “поздно”. И когда идти к косметологу? Можно годами ждать подходящего момента: пока появятся первые морщины, пока перестанут появляться прыщи, пока подруга найдёт «того самого» врача. А потом прийти с вопросом: «Мне уже пора что-то колоть?» 👀 Первая консультация вполне может начаться с другого: «Хочу понять, что происходит с моей кожей и правильно ли я за ней ухаживаю». С чем прих…

Channel
Клиника Красивые Люди
@beautiful_in_telegram
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,472subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001437749265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautiful_in_telegram |
| Description | Официальный телеграм-канал сети клиник BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE («Красивые люди») Санкт-Петербург • Москва Входим в ТОП-10 косметологических центров (премия Частная медицина-2022) Консультация менеджера @beautiful_people_manager |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautiful_in_telegram |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:26 | 7,472 | -20 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:36 | 7,492 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 7,498 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:29 | 7,510 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:48 | 7,515 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 7,525 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 7,534 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 7,539 | -2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 7,541 | -24 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 7,565 | +59 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 7,506 | -35 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 7,541 | +18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 7,523 | +56 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 7,467 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 7,478 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 7,476 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 7,480 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 7,478 | -14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 7,492 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 7,498 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.84%
- avg views ÷ 7,472 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 586
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.922%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (23 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,129 |
| Reactions total | 98 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,880
- Videos
- ≈538
- Links
- ≈1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 29s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
511 reactions across 42 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 263 | 51.5% | |
| 🔥 | 112 | 21.9% | |
| 👍 | 70 | 13.7% | |
| 🤩 | 26 | 5.09% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 3.13% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 3.13% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 1.17% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.391% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В каком возрасте вы впервые пришли к косметологу?
- До 20 лет12%
- В 20–25 лет22%
- В 26–30 лет22%
- После 30 лет31%
- Пока только собираюсь14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Поры исчезли навсегда». Почему вам снова хочется купить эту сыворотку? В отзывах — гладкие щёки. В описании — обещание сузить поры. В корзине уже третье средство с похожей задачей. А на вашей коже поры всё ещё видны. Это нормально: они являются частью строения кожи. Удалить их навсегда кремом или процедурой невозможно 🔎 Почему тогда у кого-то они заметны, а у кого-то нет? На внешний вид влияют выработка кожного …
❤1👍1
PDRN, полинуклеотиды, экзосомы… А кожа-то какой станет? Названия уже знакомые. Но хочется понять простую вещь, без уроков билологии: что изменится в зеркале и на ощупь? Разбираем 🧬 Полинуклеотиды нужны для увлажнённости, гладкости и упругости кожи. После курса инъекционных процедур мы получим более увлажнённую и эластичную кожу, более ровный рельеф и уменьшение выраженности мелких морщин. То есть работаем с конкр…
❤5🔥2
Подтянуть овал без операции — какой результат можно увидеть? 👀 Линия нижней челюсти стала менее чёткой, появились брыли, кожа под подбородком потеряла упругость? С такими запросами точно стоит записаться на консультацию по SMAS-лифтингу. Рассказываем, как работает процедура на Ultraformer, и показываем результаты наших специалистов. Что происходит во время процедуры? Аппарат направляет сфокусированный ультразвук…
❤2🔥1
Ферритин без красной отметки. Почему волосы всё равно выпадают? Анализы открыли, всё в пределах референса. Можно выдохнуть? А потом снова собирать волосы с расчёски и искать «правильный ферритин для густоты» 🔎 Ферритин не объясняет все причины выпадения, его значения используют для оценки запасов железа. Это не означает, что всем нужен ферритин «не ниже 70» или «обязательно как ваш вес». Универсальное число из вид…
❤2👍2
Билеты на январское море уже купили. А лазер можно начинать сейчас? Открываете календарь: до отпуска есть ещё несколько месяцев. Кажется, как раз успеете пройти весь курс лазерной эпиляции. Да, но поездку на солнце нужно включить в график процедур с самого начала ✈️ Что сказать специалисту? Когда вы улетаете, какие зоны хотите обработать, был ли недавний загар и какие препараты принимаете? По этим данным и состоя…
❤1
К вечеру хочется снять не только каблуки, но и собственные ноги? Что здесь делает эндосфера? День за компьютером, несколько часов на ногах — и вечером появляется тяжесть. На коже остаются следы от носков, привычная обувь, кажется, с стала на размер меньше 🥲 Что делать? Сначала важно понять причину. Следы от резинки сами по себе не объясняют, какое лечение или процедура нужны. Если отёчность появилась внезапно, в…
❤5👍1
У «ангелов» Victoria’s Secret сияют даже плечи. А у нас весь уход заканчивается на подбородке? После кадров с подиума хочется сохранить всё: макияж, причёску, платье. Мы предлагаем присмотреться ещё и к коже шеи, плеч и декольте моделей ✨ Ровный тон и сияние в кадре складываются из нескольких вещей: состояния кожи, макияжа, освещения. По видеозаписи невозможно определить, какие процедуры проходила конкретная модель…
❤4👍2
600 линий Ultraformer — на 6 050 рублей выгоднее. И ещё четыре предложения 💛 Планируете процедуры или выбираете подарок? Собрали актуальные выгодные предложения наших клиник — с ценами и условиями! Фототерапия + биоревитализация: скидка 20% на обе процедуры Комплекс для работы с неровным тоном и увлажнённостью кожи. Аппарат для фототерапии и препарат для биоревитализации подбирает наш врач. Москва — 33 600 рублей…
❤2
Вес устраивает, а тело в зеркале — не совсем. С чего начать? «Не нравится живот» — с таким запросом можно прийти к нам и после похудения, и при стабильном весе. Но за одинаковыми словами скрываются разные задачи. Просто расскажите нам, что именно хочется изменить 👇 Локальный объём. Это когда вас полностью устраивает цифра на весах, но беспокоит жировая складка на животе или боках. Здесь подойдет процедура криолипо…
❤2
Кожа блестит, но при этом стягивается. Так она жирная или сухая? Как вообще понять свой тип кожи? К обеду лоб блестит, а после умывания хочется немедленно нанести крем…Покупаем средства «для жирной кожи», а они сушат. Покупаем более плотный крем, а он ощущается некомфортно и “жирно”. Как вообще подобрать крем для лица? Как ни странно, но жирный блеск и стянутость могут появляться одновременно, так что по ним мы не …
❤4👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @beautiful_in_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В каком возрасте вы впервые пришли к косметологу?
- До 20 лет12%
- В 20–25 лет22%
- В 26–30 лет22%
- После 30 лет31%
- Пока только собираюсь14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клиника Красивые Люди” (@beautiful_in_telegram), 7,472 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautiful_in_telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.