Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бьюти-курятник

Channel

Бьюти-курятник

@beautycoop

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,080subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430461616
TypeChannel
Username@beautycoop
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/beautycoop

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0321,0801,0566 August 2026 — 1,035 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,032 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,062 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,065 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,072 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,076 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,078 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,079 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,080 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,025–1,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:181,080+1
14 Sept 2026, 14:591,079+1
10 Sept 2026, 17:391,078+2
5 Sept 2026, 15:171,076+4
1 Sept 2026, 17:431,072+7
29 Aug 2026, 09:091,065+3
26 Aug 2026, 11:441,062-2
23 Aug 2026, 22:041,064+21
20 Aug 2026, 02:281,043+11
16 Aug 2026, 17:041,032-4
7 Aug 2026, 15:421,036+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:321,035first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥5333.3%
🔥4830.2%
🎉3018.9%
✍2012.6%
👍85.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC171 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @beauty_zhmotPhoto

Сегодня кешбэковое в Подружку от т-банка, аж щедрые 50% от 2500₽!! Вернут максимум 1300 бонусов, так что оптимально накидать корзину на 2600₽. До 12:00 ещё и действует доп скидка 5%. К слову, можно попробовать применить промокод из приложения банка на 30%, найти его можно через поисковую строку. У меня корзина целиком и полностью состояла из Catrice и Essence, на них промики не действуют

🔥11❤‍🔥3🎉3

5 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC626 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Holly Polly по каким-то скидкам идёт прекрасным — не только бальзамы, но и патчи, и некоторые штуки для волос. Взяла ли я себе запас Caramel Popcorn? Да. Есть ли он у меня и без того? Тоже да. И? По продавцу смотрите! 🥰 Brands for Life https://www.wildberries.ru/seller/3965136 #скидки

🎉18✍5❤‍🔥4

4 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC352 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Карандаш гелевый для глаз Юнилук — Kawaii в оттенках '01 Neon Blue', '02 Neon Pink' Стойкие!!! Фиксируются!! ШЕСТЬДЕСЯТ РУБЛЕЙ В ГАЛАМАРТЕ КАЖДЫЙ. А в некоторых Галамартах и по 50!! Точатся обычной точилкой, не как масло, конечно, но справитесь. Я ВСЁ СКАЗАЛА😤 Галамарт (59р) #карандаш #очи #махуяж

❤‍🔥22👍8

3 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC381 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Румяна Beauty Bomb x Смешарики — Liquid Blush в оттенке '02 Лилово-лавандовый' Поправьте меня, знатоки китайских и корейских брендов, но мне кажется, что тут действительно уникальная упаковка. Rare Beauty под кислотой? Действительно холодные фиолетовые румяна! На оливковой коже будут ВЕЛИКОЛЕПНЫ, это я вам обещаю. На холодной коже тоже будут красиво розовым сидеть, а вот на тёплой и/или загорелой коже эффект будет.…

🔥26🎉9✍8

3 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC375 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Гелевый карандаш Beauty Bomb x Смешарики — Eye Pencil в оттенке '01 Серебристый' ← в каком мире это золото серебристое?! Ой ну как сияет! Младший брат карандаша из коллекции UFO, только слегка, кхм, разжиревший. А Я ЕГО ЛЮБЫМ ЛЮБЛЮ! Прекрасно ощущает себя на слизистой, в меру твёрдый, чтоб не течь, в меру мягкий, чтоб не царапать. Ну красота, ну к р а с о т и щ а!! А ещё делает охрененный блик, если провести им П…

❤‍🔥24🔥11✍7

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @beautycoop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бьюти-курятник” (@beautycoop), 1,080 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautycoop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.