Channel
@beautymigraine
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
231subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002100830742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautymigraine |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautymigraine |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 231 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 232 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:35 | 234 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 233 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 232 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 232 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 95.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мой любимый бренд Геворга neblednaya, к большому сожалению, попал в вайдберисную безысходность в июле, за которой мы с вами наблюдали и сочувствовали в соцсетях Небледной в связи с этим можно поймать очень приятные акции на отдельные позиции, но главное - нам с вами выделили промокодик SUMMER12 для дополнительной скидки 12% на сайте bygevmua.shop до 19 августа продолжаю обожать кисти бренда, скульптор и бронзер, кр…
❤12
ситуация палеточная с cheeryep вот такая 💐 начала тест с нижней, самой для меня загадочной) а зеленую верхнюю брала сама пару месяцев назад, но базово над ней чахла без причины, есть за мной такой грешок что точно могу сказать - запакованы они прекрасно: очень плотно лежат в коробках+внутри стоит защита, с которой зеленая палетка успешнейше поездила со мной на работу пару недель и осталась в идеальном состоянии, ч…
❤10
коротко про меня и минимализм в выборе ✨ 10 из 16 цветов за раз, базовый нюдик в школу 🐣 мне пришло две большие шикарные посылки, буду их понемножку показывать тут - палетка neon китайского бренда Cheeryep, которых я давненько хотела затестить, потому что упаковки и в целом продукты очень интересные, а тут такой повод 🎁 если вдруг вы тоже собирались что-то брать, и не хотите ждать, пока я разрожусь обзорами (100% …
❤15
Глобально у меня блогерский минимализм в острой фазе, думаю, как у многих сейчас Ловлю гиперфикс только в аккаунтах у пары человек из тех, с кем лично не знакома: Эля @gloweblow тут и в инсте, моя любовь и какой-то монстр продуктивности по-прежнему на ют лидирует Настя Нами @nastya_nami1 , нахожусь в процессе просмотра огромного видео про - разумеется - палетки 🤌 Даша Чадова из коллег @chadovadasha и моя новая…
❤8
За год у меня неплохо отросли волосы! фото 1 - май 2025, а фото 2 из сегодня 🐣 Похихикала с теории Эми Полер, что девочки, которые любят лошадей, сами part horse, поэтому вполне гривасты 🥸 Речь шла про Билли Айлиш и Дженнифер Лоуренс, ну тупо мы 🦁 Есть свои нюансы с этим отросшим фактом, сегодня я хочу поговорить про главный малоприятный: с объемом мы попрощались 🐸 И из-за длины, и из-за моего конячьего образа жиз…
❤10🔥3
🔥На сайте Сефоры появился эксклюзивный бренд — MARC JACOBS BEAUTY. Всего вышло 7 долгожданных продуктов: ⚫️Бронзер без талька Legally Bronze Talc-Free Blurring Powder Bronzer в 8 оттенках $42; ⚫️Кремовые румяна в стике Joystick Buildable Cream Blush Stick в 10 оттенках $35; ⚫️Однушки теней в текстуре крем-пудра Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow в 14 оттенках $29; ⚫️Стойкие кремовые помады Heart On Long-…
❤6
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @beautymigraine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лиза Мигрень / beautymigraine” (@beautymigraine), 231 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautymigraine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.