Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for сара

Channel

сара

@befided

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,005subscribers

-223 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001120677456
TypeChannel
Username@befided
Created2 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/befided

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,00516,23316,1196 August 2026 — 16,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,228 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,229 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,231 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,233 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,229 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,225 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,221 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,219 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,220 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,216 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,215 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,210 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,205 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,203 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,196 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,179 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,172 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,165 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,161 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,153 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,143 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,136 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,127 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,122 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,117 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,108 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,107 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,094 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,063 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,042 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,031 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,029 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,020 subscribers19 September 2026 — 16,005 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,971–16,267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:1416,005-15
16 Sept 2026, 22:1816,020-9
15 Sept 2026, 00:1816,029-2
13 Sept 2026, 09:1816,031-11
11 Sept 2026, 12:5716,042-21
8 Sept 2026, 17:3716,063-31
5 Sept 2026, 11:2216,094-13
3 Sept 2026, 10:4816,107-1
2 Sept 2026, 02:2716,108-9
1 Sept 2026, 00:3716,117-5
30 Aug 2026, 21:3916,122-5
30 Aug 2026, 00:2616,127-9
28 Aug 2026, 22:0416,136-7
28 Aug 2026, 00:5816,143-10
27 Aug 2026, 00:5216,153-8
25 Aug 2026, 23:1116,161-4
24 Aug 2026, 22:3416,165-7
23 Aug 2026, 10:4616,172-7
22 Aug 2026, 00:4516,179-17
20 Aug 2026, 20:2616,196first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 16,005 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,860
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held34 (27 June 202629 August 2026)
Views total14,290
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,710 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ᅠ Воспоминание: Когда мне было около 17 лет, я везде искала то, что поможет мне переписать убеждение о своей собственной слабости; тогда чем-то основательным для меня стала музыка. Помню, это был именно дебютный альбом Trap Lord — A$AP Ferg, который я заслушивала до дыр. Происходило нечто странное и незнакомое мне: каким образом треки у меня в наушниках позволяли чувствовать прочность почвы под ногами, лопатки своди

26 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC≈2,940 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ᅠ «С вершины стометрового шеста сделай ещё один шаг» — это дзен-буддийский коан. У него есть продолжение: «И тогда десять направлений мира станут всем твоим телом» * ощущение тупика возникает, когда вершина показывает, что нам больше не нужен костыль. Представьте буквально шест. Пока мы лезем, у нас есть ощущение движения. Вверх или вниз — каждое движение тела показывает само движение этого тела в мире; мы определ

23 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈3,620 viewsread 3 September 2026

ᅠ Вопрос: Это перестало работать из-за того, что произошло? Или то, что произошло, только показало, что это уже давно переставало работать?

21 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC≈4,160 viewsread 3 September 2026

ᅠ Отслеживаю сейчас в себе учащённые вспышки беспокойства. Я не раз фиксировала здесь то, как вижу возникновение тревоги: это не ужас перед неопределённостью, а само ощущение, будто мы обязаны с этим что-то сделать. ‘ imagine: вам нужно заполнить стакан водой, а перед вами глыба льда. Интенсивность переживания рождается тогда, когда мы не учитываем, что для некоторых наших действий нам нужен соавтор — время. Импуль

21 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC≈3,830 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ᅠ подкиньте тем, над которыми сейчас размышляете. Выберу несколько и порефлексируем вместе в подкасте!

19 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈4,490 viewsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

ᅠ podcast: Откуда возникает импульс что-то сделать. (сложная в объяснении идея, но, вы точно здесь найдёте то, что вас зовёт).

15 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈5,850 viewsread 3 September 2026

ᅠ Дело в том, что тот, кто носит в себе чувство вины, будет находить в мире обстоятельства/ситуации для её искупления. Вина масштабируется в стыд — от этого повышается уровень морали и сковываются действия. Диапазон «мне можно» существенно сокращается + мы всегда ждём от мира того же, чего требуем от себя, — отсюда и «несправедливость». Всё сводится не к «грязной реальности», а к запрету на право желать больше.

11 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈5,260 viewsread 3 September 2026

ᅠ Заметки: Любой вывод говорит не о том, о чём он был сделан, а о том, кто его сделал.

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @befided. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“сара” (@befided), 16,005 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/befided.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.