Channel
@behold_msk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001726605971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @behold_msk |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/behold_msk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 102 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 103 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 105 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 105 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5426861461064415727 | 27 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[ roberto cavalli fw 2004 ] один из самых любимых показов сейчас. мне нравятся цвета, фактуры и то, какую героиню они показали: богемную роскошную девушку, немного разочарованную окружающим, но наслаждающуюся собой и своей жизнью👄 🙂девочки, носим? мальчики, любуемся?
custom 54268614610644157272
[ воскресное созерцание ] делюсь красотой, которая вдохновила на неделе: ⟢ очень нравятся украшения для головы эпохи 1910-20-х, хочу носить✨ ⟢ в последнее время думаю о том, чтобы как-то изменить свое рабочее пространство под себя. съемная квартира ограничивает, но душа требует красоты… ⟢ потрясающие работы Ивана Соляева и Сержа Лютанса🖤
custom 54268614610644157275
последние несколько недель я леплю лебедя 🦢 сначала я думала, что просто сделаю его из папье-маше, и мне этого хватит, НО потом я решила создать ему фактуру из тонкой бумаги и латунной проволоки 🦢 долго и кропотливо, но получается классно, не могу перестать любоваться этими перышками 🧐
custom 54268614610644157278
я решила почистить подписчиков от всяких залетных и случайных людей не в нашем вайбе оставила только нишевых девушек и мальчиков 🌟 вы бы знали какая у меня тут выборка (посмотрела в глаза каждому 🙏🏻)
custom 542686146106441572710
👀ситуация: меня позвали гулять в архангельском, а это оказалась фотоловушка 📸✨ sona
custom 54268614610644157272
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @behold_msk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Созерцаем” (@behold_msk), 102 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/behold_msk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.