Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 蓓蓓家喝茶❤️小知識❤️

Channel

蓓蓓家喝茶❤️小知識❤️

@bei13151

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003529272544
TypeChannel
Username@bei13151
Created9 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/bei13151

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

658072.58 August 2026 — 65 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65 subscribers17 August 2026 — 69 subscribers31 August 2026 — 71 subscribers10 September 2026 — 75 subscribers17 September 2026 — 76 subscribers2 October 2026 — 80 subscribers8 August 20262 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 56 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 20:3880+4
17 Sept 2026, 00:5876+1
10 Sept 2026, 01:5575+4
31 Aug 2026, 20:2671+2
17 Aug 2026, 09:2869+4
10 Aug 2026, 02:4565no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:1665first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC5 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @bei2564Photo

❤️蓓蓓家八月福利優惠 快來找蓓蓓約妹妹吧❤️ ———————-——-——-——-——- - 👩‍❤️‍👨外約地點:旅館 飯店 部分地區可住家 見面滿意 現金消費❤️ 🚗喝茶小知識 🚗口碑外送售後樂園 🔞深夜福利社 🔞外流福利 😊蓓蓓的日常 😍大G選妃頻道 🔵🟡約會歡迎來密蓓蓓🟠🔵 ❤️一鍵加入蓓蓓小世界 ✅Telegram:@bbtw8 ✅LINE:686syk ✅ Gleezy:b8820

13 May 2026, 14:38 UTC426 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#約會中的一些細小問題 ✅1️⃣:#旅館是誰開?是一起進去嗎? 答:旅館的男生開哦,開好旅館給介紹人房號,妹妹出發到旅館,提前和櫃檯說有訪客,妹妹才能順利到房間 ✅2️⃣:#如果只買了一節想加節怎麽辦? 答:只要在妹妹沒有離開旅館前都可以加節注意:需要和介紹人講,把你想要加節的錢給妹妹就行 ✅3️⃣:#可以加妹妹的聯絡方式嗎? 答:不可以哦,因為妹妹都是兼職的,在我們這般約她我們能保證在第一時間保護雙方的安全。如果加聯絡方式自己約,出現任何經濟糾紛與我們無關(有真實案例),請重視!!! ✅4️⃣:#如果來的妹妹不喜歡怎麽辦? 答:如果不喜歡可以和介紹人講,是可以換人的,在和妹妹說抱歉請她離開,介紹人可以幫你重新換一位女生。 一個人一天最多只能換三次 如果三次都換完就不會有第四次了 也不能讓之前哪個哪個女生回來。請慎重!!! 溫馨提示:不要想着下一個會更好,因為在好的,你有這個心理都會挑出一些不喜歡然後打槍妹妹。且行…

❤1

20 Apr 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,610 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

蓓蓓台灣本土外約兼職小姐區域: ✅台北 (妹妹報班時間:中午12:00-凌晨03:00) 北投區、士林區、中山區、內湖區、大同區、松山區、中正區、信義區、萬華區、大安區、南港區、文山區 ✅新北 (妹妹報班時間:中午12:00-凌晨03:00) 新店區、土城區、中和區、永和區、板橋區、新莊區、泰山區、三重區、蘆洲區、五股區、汐止區、 {八里區、淡水區、林口區、龜山區、樹林區+200車資) ✅新竹 (妹妹報班時間:中午12:00-凌晨03:00) 北區 東區 香山區 竹北區 ✅台中 (妹妹報班時間:中午12:00-凌晨03:00) 西區、中區、東區、南區 、北區、北屯區 、 西屯區 、 南屯區、烏日區 、太平區、大里區、大雅 (神崗區 、 豐原區、沙鹿區 +200車資) ✅高雄 (妹妹報班時間:中午12:00-凌晨03:00) (楠梓區+400車資 ) (小港區、鳳山區+300…

❤1

28 Mar 2026, 02:39 UTC320 viewsread 10 August 2026

❤️#普及小知識外送茶跟定點茶差別,新手喝茶前需知重點 ! 很多剛接觸茶的新朋友們,一定會被許多的神祕的專業名詞搞得眼花撩,你知道什麼是外送茶嘛?什麼又是定點茶?這兩者的差別又在哪? 本次喝茶攻略包準你三分鐘內快速了解! ❤️茶與魚,怎麼分? 當然沒有一定哪個好,也可兩種都上。如果你時間多、喜歡釣魚的感覺,就可以吃魚。沒時間釣魚,不想承擔風險(詐騙或爛魚) 想要同價位品質固定,那就喝茶,(前提是找到好的GTO)。另外以服務來看,同價位的茶服務通常會比魚還好,魚的規定都滿多的,這不行那也不行,喝茶可以享受到很多好魚通常不願意做的服務。 PS:當然最後的選擇權都是在消費著的手上 這個是平常一些客人咨詢的 有在常問我的問題 上面是蓓蓓的回復 請注意看完及理解清楚 再有不懂得可以私密我喔~

22 Mar 2026, 05:50 UTC342 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

❤️什麼是~加節~好處在哪裏~為什麼GTO要你加節 (一)什麼是加節? 統一回覆: 這個是見仁見智,看個人。有的人是辛苦了一段時間,想好好犒勞自己這段時間的辛苦,所以會選擇6+3(包夜場);那有的客人是想說一節時間太短,他想培養情調,所以會2節,3節的去買這個妹妹。那也有的人想說一節就好,只為發洩一下。[ IF:一個妹妹6000 ,那加節也是同等價位去加,相當于再買一個6000 再做一次。]如果妹妹到了再決定加節的這種,哦,如果有加節 意想,提前講好,一次性決定可給你凹一下優惠。(因為有遇到過這樣的情況,妹到了做完一節之後,客人要加節,然後打給我凹優惠,那這種情況我也沒辦法哦一樣原價加節) ❤️(二)加節要怎麼玩?時間那麼長,射也射不了那麼多次吧? 統一回覆:也不是所有客人都只是把小姐當發洩物一樣,只圖射爽~我想大多數會是 想要一個感覺跟陪伴~工作已經那麼辛苦惹,工作上的煩心事壓在心裏,當身心都面 臨疲憊不堪的時候,你整…

❤2

17 Mar 2026, 11:12 UTC260 viewsread 10 August 2026

關於「妹子照片」的真誠對話 ⚠️許多哥哥擔心照片是否真实,蓓蓓完全明白這種不安,所以來聊聊這個話題! ❤️ 為什麼不公開妹子正臉? 因為妹妹們大多是學生或上班族,兼職身份需要低調保護。蓓蓓承諾,所有照片均經本人同意分享,且經過模糊處理,既保證真實性,也守護她們的隐私。 🍀蓓蓓的相冊裡,每張照片都附有當下環境或小道具,證明非網上下載。若你仍有疑慮,可視訊驗證(遮面),絕不躲閃! ❤️ 為何不能傳多張角度? 過度曝光可能讓妹妹們的生活受擾。蓓蓓選擇用「品質取代數量」,寧願少一點照片,也要確保她們的安全。真正美的相遇,值得耐心等待~ 🍀蓓蓓保證,見到本人的那刻,你會發現照片沒有一絲誇大。若不滿意可當場取消,訂金全額退還,這份自信來自對妹妹們的信心! ❤️ 曾被騙過的哥哥,請别害怕 蓓蓓知道業界魚龍混雜,但我的經營哲學是:「長久勝於短暫」。騙一次,失去的可能是百位客人;誠實一次,贏得的是一生的信赖。 🍀蓓蓓說「真实即正義」,…

13 Mar 2026, 12:04 UTC466 viewsread 10 August 2026

❤️為什麼要留電話❤️ ⚠️很多的客人想要約妹妹但是又害怕被騷擾 存在一系列的問題 那蓓蓓就在這邊說一下哦 ❤️ 為什麼要 電話 和 賴ID 因為妹妹都是兼職的 妹妹也都是在蓓蓓家兼職 也需要做好保護好妹妹的安全 我會保護好妹妹的個資也保護好哥哥們的個資 要電話只是為了方便當下的聯絡 賴id是為了約OK之後註冊vip醬紫 🍀哥哥們在蓓蓓家消費 蓓蓓也會負責到哥哥們結束為止 有任何的問題都是可以電話隨時聯絡 而不是為了賺你的錢 出現問題都不管你 ❤️那要電話只是為了方便當下的聯絡 是因為有時候蓓蓓不在電腦的面前 你和妹妹在做的時候出現任何的問題都是可以通過電話聯絡到蓓蓓 🍀要電話也只是為了方便當下的聯絡 是因為你相信蓓蓓 那你在沒有結束的時候我都會保護好你和妹妹的安全 直到和妹妹結束這樣 因為蓓蓓也需要做好我自己的角色呀 還有就是害怕被騷擾的 : ❤️ 蓓蓓知道有很多人曾經被欺…

9 Mar 2026, 15:07 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

❤️外送茶流程大公開:從下單到結束,一步到位! 1.選管道:鎖定信譽佳的GTO(像某論壇推薦的) 別亂加LINE以免被騙 2.報需求:跟他說你的預算 喜好(長相 身材 服務內容) 還有地點 3.等到貨:妹子通常20-40分鐘內到(提前預約 妹妹會到附近等) 記得準備現金(多數不收轉帳) 4.驗貨再付:見到人後 確認是否符合描述 不滿意可以拒接 5.享受吧:全程尊重妹子 別亂來 否則會被拉黑 小秘訣: ❤️第一次約建議選「1小時」試水溫,避免損失。 若想長期約 可以跟GTO要「會員價」或「包夜優惠」 👉常見問題大解密👈 Q:外送茶會不會被警察抓? A:理論上有風險 但實際概率超低 重點是別在公開場合交易 選摩鐵最安全 Q:如何避免爛魚? A: ① 只找有實績的GTO(像某論壇認證的) ② 要求「近期實拍照」或視訊驗證 ③ 看評價!很多老司機都會分享經驗 Q:同價位 …

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @bei13151. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“蓓蓓家喝茶❤️小知識❤️” (@bei13151), 80 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bei13151.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.