Channel
@bellflowers_s
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002465296434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bellflowers_s |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bellflowers_s |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:07 | 107 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 106 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 104 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 104 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
148 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 20.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 14.9% | |
| 💘 | 19 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5377692177243581560 | 16 | 10.8% | |
| 🍓 | 16 | 10.8% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 8.78% | |
| custom 5381833912991366650 | 10 | 6.76% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 6.76% | |
| custom 5472173464821439380 | 9 | 6.08% | |
| custom 5206607781414579059 | 3 | 2.03% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Этот тгк будет моим ларп стили в котором будет только сп1,со1,сх1,сп2,со2,сх2,сп3,со3,сх3,сп4,со4,сх4,сп5,со5,сх5,сп6,со6,сх6,сп7,со7,сх7,сп8,со8,сх8,сп9,со9,сх9,истж,исфж,инфж,интж,истп,исфп,инфп,интп,естп,есфп,енфп,ентп,естж,есфж,енфж,ентж и че там ещё есть
❤6🥰2
👻👻👻
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пр я не поступил в уник, а это означает что я целый год буду страдать хуйней = буду больше рисовать если не сделаю самокик А теперь вопрос дня, вы шарите за эннеаграмму и стоит ли мне по ним чето рисовать
Вот они слева направо
💘6🥰4🍓2❤1
Мои друзья ананасы
🍓8❤🔥5🥰4
Рисовал изначально в чб и то неправильно, лол... Не распределил тона
💘8🕊2🍓1
Posted without readable text
❤9💘4🕊3
Спидпейнт Честно, сильно отвык и за этот год у меня отсутствует прогресс, но надеюсь что смогу снова заняться своими соц сетями и хобби
❤🔥10🍓4🕊3
Anchik🐶 pinned a photo
Милашкк Куу 🩷
custom 537769217724358156010❤🔥7🕊2💘1custom 52066077814145790591
Ну и похвастаюсь тем что набрал 100/100 на творческих экзаменах 🌟🌟 перед семьёй не удалось похвастаться, похвастаюсь тут
❤14
Вообще хотел в артфайте поучаствовать, но к сожалению не в тайминг у меня всё
custom 538183391299136665010
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bellflowers_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👻👻👻
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anchik🐶” (@bellflowers_s), 107 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bellflowers_s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.