𝖡𝖾𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖻🆕🆕🆕 pinned a video

Channel
ׄ ᯓ𝖡𝖾᥆𝗆 𝖼𝗅ᥙ𝖻᭡
@beomclub01
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,116subscribers
+360 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002450885881 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beomclub01 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beomclub01 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 1,116 | +22 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 1,094 | +26 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 1,068 | +126 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:13 | 942 | +17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 925 | +49 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 876 | +53 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 823 | +37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 786 | +30 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 756 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5257992344942168322 | 18 | 46.2% | |
| custom 5845889933729865989 | 9 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5846167560415878756 | 9 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5298612556489847317 | 3 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beomclub01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
𝖡𝖾𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖻🆕🆕🆕 pinned a video
خب اینم از پست جدید کلی ریکت بدید بهش😳 بعد چندین وقت ادیت زدم شنوای نظرات قشنگتون هستم🍥 برای پروموت فقط ادیت فور شه. تا فردا شب پستی فور نمیشه.
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎀𝖸𝗈𝗎’𝗋𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗎𝗅,𝖸𝗈𝗎’𝗋𝖾 𝗐𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗎𝗅✨
custom 525799234494216832218custom 58458899337298659899custom 58461675604158787569
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
خسته نباشیییی
وای چقدر گوگولوسمسمسمسممس هیونلیکسسسس😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
ㅤ🍥ㅤ 𝖠 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗋 #Felix ㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 #Starykids 's 𝖮𝖼𝖾𝖺𝗇
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ🍙ㅤ 𝖠 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗋 #Hyunjin ㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 #Starykids 's 𝖮𝖼𝖾𝖺𝗇
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @beomclub01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@amorexr · 2523 posts 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋
@niszxxmu · 3173 posts𝗦𝗲𝗼𝘂𝗹é
@Seoule3 · 6562 posts 🆕🆕:𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝖿𝗅𝗎𝖿𝖿 ꒱ 𐙚
@bunnypackk · 1302 posts ℳ𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘮𝘪𝘯 𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘣 پک جدید؟؟؟ (🆕)
@deq4vu · 622 postsلـازانیا
@eausxv · 3,0872 postsㅤ⊹ 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 Ᏼlᥙᧉ ୨𓏲 ( لنگوئج و تم سونو )
@kpopsttar · 7,2302 postsㅤlil nerdieㅤ
@lilahyeoni · 2432 posts mama's boy 🆕
@mamasboay · 1292 posts 𝐃𝖺𝗅𝗆𝗈ꪱ𝗋𝖾 🆕
@Dalmoire · 3341 postㅤ 𝐋𝗂𝗍𝗍ᥣ𝖾 𝐒𝗍α𝗋 ⋆
@FromYeonjunToHisStar · 6111 postیـونـانِ بـاسـتـانی
@Historgreec · 1,1101 postMaison Étherelle
@MaisonEtherelle · 9851 post͛𝘔𝘪𝘥 𝘑𝘶𝘭𝘺 ͙ ᩘ
@MidJuly_Hyonho · 3101 postྀ⃝ ๋ྀ 𝙎𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 چک/پاکسازی
@Selnfhile · 2721 postㅤКим﹙𝖥𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖾𝗋 + 𝖯𝖺𝖼𝗄﹚
@TAEHYUNGPC · 16,1061 post 𝐁𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾 é𝗉𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾 🆕
@chaennie_pack · 2,5781 post𝖧𝖺𝗋𝗆︎𝗈𝗇︎𝗒
@diaryoflove11 · 1051 posthockey boy پڪ
@hockeyxx5 · 7481 post 𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖾 | سرگرمی
@iveleeh · 1,8131 post𝓑𝗅𝖾𝗐
@rockstartalgi · 1101 post 𝗌𝗁︎𝗂𝗍b𝗒𝗌𝗁︎𝗂𝗍
@shitiit · 4481 postA Temple for Sinners
@whatuwhantafifi · 1501 postwony ’s diary وونیونگ
@wony8di · 751 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ׄ ᯓ𝖡𝖾᥆𝗆 𝖼𝗅ᥙ𝖻᭡” (@beomclub01), 1,116 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beomclub01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.