Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Береги природу!

Channel

Береги природу!

@beregi_prirodu_bp

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,538subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001939330083
TypeChannel
Username@beregi_prirodu_bp
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/beregi_prirodu_bp

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@beregi_prirodu_bp was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@bp_tvoumatb
held 6 August 20266 August 2026

Growth

2509,6064,9286 August 2026 — 9,524 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,528 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,536 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,550 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,571 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,579 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,590 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,599 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,604 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,603 subscribers2 September 2026 — 250 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,606 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,580 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,538 subscribers9,5386 August 202615 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 39 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 03:159,538-42
11 Sept 2026, 07:219,580-26
6 Sept 2026, 12:169,606+9,356
2 Sept 2026, 01:53250-9,353
1 Sept 2026, 23:459,603-1
1 Sept 2026, 17:159,604+5
29 Aug 2026, 23:449,599+9
27 Aug 2026, 07:559,590+11
24 Aug 2026, 03:179,579+8
20 Aug 2026, 05:569,571+21
16 Aug 2026, 21:239,550+14
13 Aug 2026, 15:359,536+8
10 Aug 2026, 05:319,528+4
6 Aug 2026, 23:009,524no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:489,524first reading

Engagement

133 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.35%
avg views ÷ 9,538 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 133 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held133 (4 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total5,163
Reactions total273
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,173 reactions across 131 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍31626.9%
🔥21518.3%
20317.3%
🤔12510.7%
🤯675.71%
🤬524.43%
👏484.09%
😁342.90%
😱322.73%
👎272.30%
💯262.22%
😢151.28%
🥰60.512%
50.426%
🤝20.171%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 133 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @beregi_prirodu_bp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 133 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC27 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

❗️ Под Петербургом горит несанкционированная свалка. Огонь охватил 400 квадратных метров Свалка находится на территории промзоны «Колтуши» во Всеволожском районе Ленобласти. По предварительным данным регионального ГУ МЧС, причиной пожара стал газовый баллон, оказавшийся в толще мусора. Взрыв слышали жители Новосергиевки, Колтушей и Янино незадолго до половины одиннадцатого утра, звук напугал даже школьников на лине

🤯3😱1

1 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC41 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026

🍄 За любимые грибы в Подмосковье штрафовать не будут С 1 сентября в регионе вводится ответственность за незаконный сбор, продажу и уничтожение грибов из Красной книги Московской области. Штраф для граждан составит до 3 тыс. рублей, для должностных лиц до 30 тыс. рублей и до 100 тыс. для юрлиц. Как поясняют в Минэкологии Московской области, в Красную книгу внесены 27 видов грибов. Среди них нет белых, подосиновиков,

43👍2

1 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC47 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🌡 Июль 2026 года стал самым жарким в России с 1891 года Об этом сообщил директор Гидрометцентра Юрий Симонов. Средняя температура месяца превзошла прежний рекорд, державшийся с 2010 года. Для Северного полушария июль тоже оказался самым теплым в метеорологической летописи, а в Арктике замкнул пятерку самых тёплых. Июнь стал вторым самым жарким в России, он уступил июню 2012 года всего одну десятую градуса. В август

👍1🤝1

1 Sept 2026, 10:32 UTC53 viewsread 1 September 2026

📖 Развитые страны сократили выбросы на 31% с 1990 года. За последний отчётный год — на 0,5% Секретариат РКИК ООН опубликовал доклад по национальным кадастрам стран Приложения I, включая Россию. США в сводку не вошли: их кадастр к контрольной дате не поступил. Если не учитывать землепользование и лесное хозяйство, выбросы упали с 12,82 млрд тонн CO₂-эквивалента в 1990 году до 8,85 млрд в 2024-м. С учётом этого секто

1 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC219 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Пакет изменений в экологическом законодательстве С 1 сентября 2026 года вступает в силу большой пакет изменений в экологическом законодательстве. Меняются требования к учету отходов, НВОС, водопользованию, РОП, климатическим проектам и лесному регулированию. Собрали в одном месте основные изменения и сроки, которые важно не пропустить. Подробнее – по ссылке. «Береги природу!»

5👍3🔥31

1 Sept 2026, 06:24 UTC63 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026

🏭 Германия сокращает выбросы, но впервые может выйти за лимит Прогноз дал аналитический центр Agora Energiewende по предварительным данным за первое полугодие. С января по июнь страна выбросила около 327 млн тонн CO₂-эквивалента — на 2% меньше, чем годом ранее. Если такой темп сохранится, за год наберётся 635 млн тонн при разрешённых 625 млн. Выбросы падают, но в лимит страна всё равно не укладывается. Аналитики св

👏3👍2

31 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC72 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026

💧 Уфаводоканал» вложил 2,175 млрд рублей в очистные, но зачесть их в счёт экологических платежей не смог Арбитражный суд Уральского округа оставил в силе решения нижестоящих судов: предприятие должно заплатить Росприроднадзору 75,12 млн рублей за негативное воздействие на окружающую среду за 2016 год. В 2008–2012 годах водоканал за свой счёт построил блоки биологической очистки и станцию УФ-обеззараживания. Нагрузка

🤔5🤝1

31 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC66 viewsread 1 September 2026
File

📋Институт исследований и экспертизы ВЭБ подвел промежуточные итоги сахалинского эксперимента. В актив ему приписали снижение индекса загрязнения воздуха в Южно-Сахалинске более чем вдвое, третье место региона в рейтинге инвестклимата, водородный кластер. Список солидный. Вопрос в том, при чем тут квоты на парниковые газы. На 2024 год предприятиям разрешили выбросить 8 485 тыс. тонн CO₂-эквивалента — выбросили 7 990

31 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC69 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026

🏭 Британия назвала 16 углеродных систем, которые зачтет при импорте HMRC опубликовало перечень зарубежных схем углеродного ценообразования, признанных подходящими для зачёта при уплате британского CBAM. В списке: EU ETS, Китай, Япония, Корея, Казахстан, Индия, Австралия, Канада, Новая Зеландия, Швейцария, Чили, Сербия, Сингапур, ЮАР, Тайвань, Черногория. Смысл зачета — избежать двойного налогообложения. За выбросы

👏2🤔1😢1

31 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC70 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026

💧В Тюменской области подвели предварительные итоги летнего паводка: погибло около 400 тонн рыбы В Туре и Тоболе рыбные запасы оцениваются как практически полностью утраченные. Частично пострадали Иртыш, Исеть и Тавда, кормовая база сократилась примерно на 95%. Причину массовой гибели специалисты связывают с острым дефицитом растворенного в воде кислорода. Признаков токсического загрязнения не выявлено. Основная вер

👍2😱21🤬1🤯1

31 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC66 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026

📖 Турция утвердила правила своего углеродного рынка Положение о системе TR ETS вступило в силу 27 августа. Его правовой базой стал первый турецкий закон о климате № 7552, принятый в июле 2025 года. Под действие системы подпадают энергоёмкие производства — от нефтепереработки и металлургии до стекла и бумаги. Предприятия разбиты на три категории по объёму выбросов: до 50 тыс. тонн CO₂-эквивалента в год, от 50 до 500

🤔2🤬1

30 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

📋 Спутниковые снимки помогли отследить 41 разрушительный шквал в России Исследование под руководством замдиректора Института физики атмосферы РАН Александра Чернокульского разобрало 41 такое явление на территории страны с 2001 по 2024 год — от европейской части до Дальнего Востока. Только за последние годы они убили в России как минимум 91 человека и ранили ещё 539. До сих пор было неизвестно, как часто такие шквал

🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @beregi_prirodu_bp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@beregi_prirodu_bp edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Эколог Соколова ®
@sokolovaeco · 38,608
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Береги природу!” (@beregi_prirodu_bp), 9,538 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beregi_prirodu_bp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.